Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You don't know about qmailtoaster-plus? > http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/ No I didn't or I might have seen it go by in the threads not being sure what it was. When things look like programming talk, I don't generally follow it. I am looking at it now, thanks. Mike -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: Or even take that $250 paid to Plesk and go to rent-a-coder and got the vqadmin package fixed and released it back to the community. Which is pretty much what I did a while ago with TMDA (which works nicely right now with QMT, and would be

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Harry Zink
Lucian, Please, do not reply at the bottom of an interminably quoted chunk of mail - place your replies at the top of mail. Harry On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: > Anyone know if there are any scripts out there that would help > keep this system up to date? If not, is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyhow, you lost me here, I'm not sure what we're talking about now? qtp-newmodel? Yet another thing I lost track of then? It's part of qmailtoaster-plus -- ctually doing exactly what you wanted, i.e. being able to check on updates, and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can easily move a few domains over to test something. I'll take a look at that, thank you. It will work with QMT? It claims to be able to work with qmail, but I have not tested that - it wasn't relevant for what I was using it for, at

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please provide feedback for the vqadmin interface to Inter7. No need to > speak of it here. Nobody here that I'm aware of write any portion of it. Told you already, they didn't write anything. I hired a programmer to add the interface to it. That was what I was offering, I made that clear. If yo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harping? It's called feedback. I could have just walked and not given anyone any input. You should put it into proper perspective. Please provide feedback for the vqadmin interface to Inter7. No need to speak of it here. Nobody here that I'm aware of write any p

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> directly to work on your machines (remember, I had Yahoo working fine by > using one of my test domains pointed at your machine so I could control > DNS?). You offered to take a look by trying some tests. I didn't ask you to work on my machines, I asked you if you'd be interested in a little co-

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be honest, that's really confusing. You keep pointing that out and I don't know why. I've made it clear why I'm wanting to use this package, I've even explained my reasons for not being able to afford help on EVERYTHING we have going on right now. As part of my tak

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize for saying this publicly, it was not intended. Mike On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:17:32 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> make MY job easier. To be honest, I don't care about your job. It's (your >> >> job) not making MY job any easier, nor is it paying me anything, so I have >> > PS: I of

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> make MY job easier. To be honest, I don't care about your job. It's (your > job) not making MY job any easier, nor is it paying me anything, so I have PS: I offered you those resources for a reason. I thought you might see the opportunity but you didn't. What can I say. Mike --

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And FYI: plesk uses Postfix if I remember right from the last time I looked > at it - so all you're paying for is the pretty interface. I could care less what it uses, it works and it's easy to use. Like I said, many cannot become experts at everything they touch, you've gotta concentrate of a f

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qtp-newmodel is a script in QT-Plus that downloads the newest QMT packages I thought that was in the qtp-plus menu if I recall. I don't have it in front of me but will post it once I take another look. Something or some things in there didn't work. Updating never

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> qtp-newmodel is a script in QT-Plus that downloads the newest QMT packages I thought that was in the qtp-plus menu if I recall. I don't have it in front of me but will post it once I take another look. Something or some things in there didn't work. Updating never worked, it never finds updates a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Jake Vickers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know if there are any scripts out there that would help keep this system up to date? If not, is there anyone who might consider haven't you tried qmailtoaster plus ? No, I knew about a command line tool which is broken in the ISO install but di

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Anyone know if there are any scripts out there that would help >> keep this system up to date? If not, is there anyone who might consider > haven't you tried qmailtoaster plus ? No, I knew about a command line tool which is broken in the ISO install but didn't get the chance to look into it wh

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Lucian Cristian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand, qtp-newmodel is not working for you ? i've fixed it sometime ago, right now is a version in development that is doing the sandbox in 4-5 seconds You might want to put your reply at the top of the long thread if you're not going to delete it. No

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't understand, qtp-newmodel is not working for you ? i've fixed it > sometime ago, right now is a version in development that is doing the > sandbox in 4-5 seconds You might want to put your reply at the top of the long thread if you're not going to delete it. Not sure how many folks will r

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Lucian Cristian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Dan, this got out of order in my thread :). Anyhow, ok, so my thought about using QMT as a filter does has merit. Basically, it would just take the incoming email on port 25 then route it to the main mail server. Can you think of any complications related to D

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry Dan, this got out of order in my thread :). Anyhow, ok, so my thought about using QMT as a filter does has merit. Basically, it would just take the incoming email on port 25 then route it to the main mail server. Can you think of any complications related to DNS or anything else if I just

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Dan, definitely worthwhile input. I don't use any MS products anymore but get the idea. I think (Dan) had touched on this also, about outgoing. No, I would only use this idea for cleaning incoming, outgoing would go out from the mail server it is being sent from, no need to clean it. It's m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You've already switched, but you may want to take a look at > Virtualmin. It's about as much as a turnkey solution as it gets (it's > more than just mail, though), and updates are handled as automatic as > you want. I had only moved about 8 domains over to QMT to see how things would go. Other t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 9, 2008, at 10:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And to be honest, I don't want to use sendmail as a solution but I do have to find a spam solution since plesk out of the box, with it's tools doesn't seem to do much now that I've had QMT in action. You've already switched, but you may

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FINALLY, if you take into consideration the original poster, (Mike?), who > had difficulty in getting a QMT setup and working, and so abandoned that as > an end-user MTA, the idea that using a sendmail/mimedefang approach would > work "better" seems to ignore his admitted limitations (no offense,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, one of the interesting things, I think, is that I didn't just walk away, with no one ever knowing why yet another person might have left a project. I'm here to answer any questions I can having used it and still wanting to. That should be of some value. I can't imagine how many people

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reasons I had to move on were few but important in my case. The other mail server gets it's updates automatically, I just click on the update and we're done. It works. There's a similar mechanism for QMT that exists able to do somet

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Since these are your issues, you could have figured these out. Heck, > if I can figure them out, and I'm a caveman when it comes to this > stuff, you should have been able to, as well. The testing seemed to prove that the system and DNS were fine. I was lucky enough to have some of the best folk

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread Harry Zink
On Feb 8, 2008, at 10:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was basically forced to move my mail to an existing server yesterday because we were having way too much mail never making it to various sites like hotmail and yahoo. We simply cannot exist without being able to send mail to these la

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread Dan McAllister
I have several problems with the James' post below. However, let me start by saying that I spent more than 20 years administering large sites using sendmail. In fact, I used to be one of only 3 accredited instructors in "sendmail Administration" for Learning Tree International (for whom I no lo

RE: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was basically forced to move my mail to an existing server yesterday because we were having way too much mail never making it to various sites like hotmail and yahoo. We simply cannot exist without being able to send mail to these large sites. I found it sad to have to move them and since only y

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread Eric "Shubes"
Aslı Ayaz wrote: > Hi > > We use qmail toaster in our company, how can I see the mailing lists from > the web. > The wiki (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Main_Page) contains a link to the list archive (http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/) -- -Eric 'shubes'

RE: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread Aslı Ayaz
(just my 2 cents!) :) Regards, jp -Original Message- From: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:48 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer I have implemented this, using QMT as a front-end

RE: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread James E. Pratt
my 2 cents!) :) Regards, jp -Original Message- From: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:48 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer I have implemented this, using QMT as a front-end fil

Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread Dan McAllister
I have implemented this, using QMT as a front-end filter for an Exchange Server... It's actually simple... a) Install QMT -- but do NOT add ANY domains (much less users) b) Add your domain to the /var/qmail/contol/rcpthosts file, eg: mymaildomain.com c) Add the address of your exchange server

[qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing is that spam went way way down while I was using QMT. Are there any documents out there on perhaps using QMT simply as a pre-processing host? All email coming into the network would go though that first, get cleaned, then continue on to the mail server. Mike --