On Aug 11, 2007, at 5:05 AM, PakOgah wrote:
hope this weekend your tests running smoothly.
please tell us the results
can't wait till Monday
Just for general information - I downloaded and compiled the updated
clamav and spamassassing from Erik's developmnet site.
Then, install them with
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Hello
I have very busy smtp servers
using clamav 0.91.1
When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is
working fine
glad to hear that, because I was planning to upgrade clamav into ver 0.91.1
I am still using ver 0.90.1 and can't update virus definition.
After running the new spamassassin on the dev site
the bugs in the previous versions seem fixed
No extra delay in scanning, no rdns issues tagging all emails
So far so good
I tested on fc5, centos 4.5 and cents 5, both 32 64bts OS
using the stable latest packages + clamav 0.91.1
for the info
I use google for some search.
I suppose you talk this about:
http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html
Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver
(tcpserver -h)?
Changing to -h is probably a good idea.
Before SpamAssassin would do the reverse lookup if the MTA didn't. Now
that SpamAssassin relies on the MTA, it's no biggy.
E
On 8/10/07, L. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use google for some search.
I suppose you talk this about:
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on
devel site under heavy load?
I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav
0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all
viruses that freshclam
I have no issues. I process approx 30K messages a day on some of my boxes.
The new spamassassin requires many more perl modules to be complete.
Best bet is to either use rpmforge repo and install the perl modules
via rpm OR to cpan install them.
Without the packages, the load is higher with the
ok, looks like better choose spamd 3.1 branch for me.
If i think correctly on this new machine amount of messages can be hier upto
two times (~60-70K) (much more virtual domains).
Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with
src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or
Greetings,
Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with
src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabling experimental code)?
I am running ClamAV exactly as it is on the dev site.
And is there any plans for moving it on main site (and squirrel webmail too
:) )?
I
L. A. wrote:
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on
devel site under heavy load?
I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav
0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all
viruses that
10 matches
Mail list logo
