Kisakye Alex wrote:
Hi All,
I’ve had a slow SMTP spell this afternoon, after running a few test (dig
tool) is discovered my server was not reaching ‘lists.dsbl.org’ I
disabled it and now SMTP is back to normal superfast..
I have a DNS on my mail machine so I run
[r...@mail ~]# dig
I agree with Eric. I got away from dnsbl.org a couple years ago. They
were just flat wrong and slow way too often. I now only use
zen.spamhaus.org and it seems to be very up to date and I don't recall
ever having a slowness problem.
Keep in mind, the more RBL's you have the slower the process
Kisakye Alex wrote:
Hi All,
I've had a slow SMTP spell this afternoon, after running a few test
(dig tool) is discovered my server was not reaching 'lists.dsbl.org' I
disabled it and now SMTP is back to normal superfast..
I have a DNS on my mail machine so I run
[r...@mail ~]#
I agree with Phil. ;) When it comes to RBLs, more isn't necessarily
better. Fewer 'choice' ones is best.
That being said, you might be interested to know that with spamdyke, all
of the RBLs are checked concurrently, not serially. This improves
performance when using multiple RBLs. Even so,
Hi Alex
Check your rbl lists
Like I said yesterday if you use opm.blitzed.org you will have such issues
-P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
My toaster has been running ok until yesterday, the mail client outlook
has failed to send emails out through my toaster. it keep returning an
Thanks Philip
Opm.blitzed.org was the problem
Alex
--
Hi Alex
Check your rbl lists
Like I said yesterday if you use opm.blitzed.org you will have such issues
-P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
My toaster has been running ok until yesterday, the mail client outlook
has failed to
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION - RESOLVED
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your localhost dns server.
Erik
On 2/14/07, 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear friends
the issue of slow smtp session is resolved. outgoing emails are really
Internet, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:36 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION - RESOLVED
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:36 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION - RESOLVED
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your localhost dns server
: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:36 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION - RESOLVED
It's probable you didn't setup forwarders in your localhost dns server.
Erik
On 2/14/07, 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear friends
the issue of slow
Hi all
based on what we have discussed, here are the checks to be made incase of a
slow smtp session faced by emails users located on server sending out emails
using outlook express or similar email client
in a real life practical example
assuming that your server has a ping response of less
-
From: 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION
hi
both m/c are dell dual xeon 2.8 with 2 gb ram
ips below are allocated for dns server by our isps.
the slow machine
: 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION
hi
both m/c are dell dual xeon 2.8 with 2 gb ram
ips below are allocated for dns server by our isps.
the slow machine is slow at the third
the problems here
with it...see your DNS... like other guys says...
regards
thiago
- Original Message -
From: 24x7server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION
hi
both m/c
hi
both machines use normal port 25
however i noted one more point
on the second machine when we send email to some domain within the same machine
then it is fast.
mails to email ids on remote domains is slow in the sending message stage
also i have one more question -- is it possible to
24x7server wrote:
hi
we have two different type of installations of qmail toaster on two different
machines
m/c 1
redhat enterprise 3
qmailtoaster without using db for vpopmail
m/c 2
fedora 4
qmailtoaster using mysql mysql 5 db for vpopmail
both m/c are enabled in the same way with smtp
24x7server wrote:
hi
both machines use normal port 25
/var/qmail/control/blacklists could be the difference then. Are these files
the same on both machines?
however i noted one more point
on the second machine when we send email to some domain within the same
machine then it is fast.
hi
both m/c are dell dual xeon 2.8 with 2 gb ram
ips below are allocated for dns server by our isps.
the slow machine is slow at the third stage ie sending message. it is fast
during the stages -- connecting, authorizing
slow machine -- bocacom, florida
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver
24x7server wrote:
hi
we have two different type of installations of qmail toaster on two different
machines
m/c 1
redhat enterprise 3
qmailtoaster without using db for vpopmail
m/c 2
fedora 4
qmailtoaster using mysql mysql 5 db for vpopmail
both m/c are enabled in the same way
seekuel wrote:
Sir, why cant I find /usr/sbin/sendmail softlink and
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-sendmail?
Thanks
You should have a softlink linking /var/qmail/bin/sendmail to
/usr/sbin/sendmail
If you do not have the /var/qmail/bin/sendmail file then something did
not get installed
seekuel wrote:
I will now download the updated version of the toaster then I'll try
to have a fresh install this weekend. Sir, during the installation of
the toaster everything went smoothly. Is there any changes between the
.tar and .rpm installation when it regards to the names under
21 matches
Mail list logo
