Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

I use google for some search. I suppose you talk this about: http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver (tcpserver -h)?

RE: [qmailtoaster] Disabling DomainKeys not working?

Thanks, I'll try. Best regards, Peter Wu -Original Message- From: Andreas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:04 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Disabling DomainKeys not working? Hi Yi-Lei, just delete the directorys with

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

Lucian Cristian wrote: Lucian Cristian wrote: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default mail-address - is one of the a catch all account? Johannes Lucian Cristian schrieb: hi everyone, recently while I was monitoring some mail

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default mail-address - is one of the a catch all account? Johannes Lucian Cristian schrieb: hi everyone, recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing happening: using

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

So, all of these perl package need to be installed if we are going to use SA ver 3.2.x ? Kyle Quillen wrote: Thanks Guys, I installed everything on this list with out a hitch Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09,

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default mail-address - is one of the a catch all account? Johannes Lucian Cristian schrieb: hi everyone, recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing happening: using tai64nlocal for local time smtp/current:

[qmailtoaster] re-install qmail

since i've done the upgrade i've had systematic failures with multiple parts of qmail. is there a way to re-install through the script without having to remove each rpm and dumping the qmail folders? I was dumb enough not to backup all the config files, but then again this is a home test

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassasin scan Spam PDF attach

PakOgah wrote: PakOgah wrote: Extract from Securityfocus... Hi, The @Mail dev team have created a module for spamassassin which uses the sa engine to scan the content of PDF attachments and append the spam score to the score of the email message -- and it WORKS!

[qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

Hello people, Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for example: user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only and cannot send mails to all other domains. user2 can only send mails to domain4 and domain2 only and cannot send mails to all

Re: [qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

seekuel wrote: Hello people, Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for example: user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only and cannot send mails to all other domains. user2 can only send mails to domain4 and domain2 only and cannot

Re: [qmailtoaster] bulk mail and whitelist services

Todd W wrote: Hi, I need to provide a non minimal service level to verify the big webmail services accept mail as non-bulk. So far I've only suceeded with AOL. Hotmail, Yahoo, and Google mark the mail as bulk. Now, I'm only somewhat of a sysadmin but I'm good enough to earn money as one,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Limit specific users to domains

2007/8/10, seekuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello people, Is there a way to limit users sending emails to a specific domain? for example: user1 can send mails to domain1, domain2, domain3, and domain4 only and cannot send mails to all other domains. user2 can only send mails to domain4 and

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

Changing to -h is probably a good idea. Before SpamAssassin would do the reverse lookup if the MTA didn't. Now that SpamAssassin relies on the MTA, it's no biggy. E On 8/10/07, L. A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use google for some search. I suppose you talk this about:

[qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

hi everyone, recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this thing happening: using tai64nlocal for local time smtp/current: 2007-08-10 16:36:17.860683500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote 235-194-218-83.globnet.md:unknown:83.218.194.235 rcpt :

RE: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

Thanks Guys, I installed everything on this list with out a hitch Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:57 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

Re: [qmailtoaster] mail accepted to nonexistent user

Lucian Cristian wrote: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: Are you forwarding mails to non-existing users to a default mail-address - is one of the a catch all account? Johannes Lucian Cristian schrieb: hi everyone, recently while I was monitoring some mail deliveries I saw this