Some similar error i have this summer with one of client mailservers that my qt
communicate with.
Kerio mailserver on another my machine works fine with it via ssl.
As one of solution - disable tls in qt i suppose, afaik, by removing
certificates afaik. :)
29.11.07, 08:23, PakOgah ([EMAIL
Hi Jake,
I have the stock tcp.smtp file:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1
I read the wiki. It also contradicts what was happening to me. It says An
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is considered local if domain is listed in locals.
But
if I put a domain in there, Qmail bounces the message and says the user
doesn't exist but the log file says it does.
-P
-Original
Greetings,
I'm seeing clamav sitting at the top of the process table on my RHEL 4
based toaster:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
25685 clamav16 0 155m 53m 920 S 198 1.3 68:03.72 clamd
Can anyone comment on what might be provoking this?
This is
Hello Again,
On the same RHEL 4 box where I've been seeing clamd swell up and push the
load on the box to 10, I'm seeing instances where qmailctl stop is
leaving qmail-send, qmail-smtpd and other qmail service running after the
stop command is issued.
kill -9 does kill the procs, but if I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Again,
On the same RHEL 4 box where I've been seeing clamd swell up and push the
load on the box to 10, I'm seeing instances where qmailctl stop is
leaving qmail-send, qmail-smtpd and other qmail service running after the
stop command is issued.
it may
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Jake Vickers wrote:
Hi Jake,
198% CPU? Wow. Never seen that one before.
clamav will check it's database every hour (default, changeable in the
config) which I've noticed will eat the CPU for 3-12 minutes depending
on the CPU every hour. Is it an hourly thing, or an all
Also, when clamd is running the way it is, qmailctl isn't killing it
properly.
Here're the results of my latest qmailctl stop:
# qmailctl stat
authlib: supervise not running
clamd: up (pid 32085) 4539 seconds, want down
imap4: supervise not running
imap4-ssl: supervise not running
pop3:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Jake Vickers wrote:
Hi Jake,
198% CPU? Wow. Never seen that one before.
clamav will check it's database every hour (default, changeable in the
config) which I've noticed will eat the CPU for 3-12 minutes depending
on the CPU every hour. Is it
It's an all the time thing (at least at the moment). I've killed it a
restarted it a couple of times this morning. But once it runs for a
a while it gets right back up there.
For example, here's a snapshot of current resource usage:
PID USER PR NI %CPUTIME+ %MEM VIRT RES SHR
On Nov 29, 2007 2:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Natalio Gatti wrote:
Which clamav version are you using? I have similar problems with
clamav-0.90.1.
They dissappear when I installed 0.91.2 (look in devel.qmailtoaster.com)
Looks like it's:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Natalio Gatti wrote:
Looks like it's:
clamav-toaster-0.88.3-1.3.2
--Duncan
So, you should update your clamav. Remember to recompile reinstall
simscan after you install the new clamav.
OK. I've never touched any part of this install since new; full upgrade
A while back, I was working with Eric Shubes on a project to add a
unioned filesystem method into the sandboxing for the qmailtoaster-plus
system.
It has been sitting for a while, but I finally had a chance to look at
it again and integrated it into the most current version of the qtp
scripts.
Also, it should go without saying, that if this breaks your server,
forgets to feed your cat, breaks your collection of vinyl records that
you still keep around for kicks and/or implodes the universe... you're
using the script with the knowledge that could happen and I can't really
be held liable
Ariel wrote:
This number is well in databyte to limit attach a 20 MG?
20971520
The databytes value is how large of a message your system will handle -
message AND MIME type (attachment).
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Mike you and I both.
I think that I have something messed up in my tcp.smtp file but am not for
sure.
I posted it a couple of emails back
Thanks
Q
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:17 PM
To:
16 matches
Mail list logo
