Hi,
I wanted to know if there are any tools which can help check the qmail
server security, integrity and availability.
Security - To test the qmail server is not an open relay. And to test if any
of the mail accounts having any weak passwords or sending unnecessary high
volume of emails.
CJ,
All clients are redirected to their own domain's webmail. This way a client
doesn't have to remember a domain which they have no 'relation' to.
Like so:
example.com/webmail redirects to https://www.example.com/webmail/
example1.com/webmail redirects to https://www.example1.com/webmail/
Here's my first test virtual machine.
I used a host machine CentOS 5.3 i386 with 4GB or memory on an Intel Q9400
I installed the latest OpenVZ virtualization platform.
I used a Virtual Machine Centos 5.5 i386 template and gave it 1GB RAM
and 10gb space.
I installed qmailtoaster and I got the
All,
I am setting up a new QMT install on a testing box (laptop) to document
the process and to become more familiar with the process. I notice that
after loading QMTISO5 I am left at the root login prompt with seemingly
a lot that is not configured (like host name, tcp.smtp, etc).
My
On 06/06/2010 10:21 AM, Scott Hughes wrote:
All,
I am setting up a new QMT install on a testing box (laptop) to
document the process and to become more familiar with the process. I
notice that after loading QMTISO5 I am left at the root login prompt
with seemingly a lot that is not
On 6/6/10 9:52 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 06/06/2010 10:21 AM, Scott Hughes wrote:
All,
I am setting up a new QMT install on a testing box (laptop) to
document the process and to become more familiar with the process. I
notice that after loading QMTISO5 I am left at the root login prompt
Hey Jake, this looks like a bug in the qmail-toaster.spec file. I'd
suggest that Eli file a bug report, but Mantis isn't up yet. I can have
a look at the spec file myself, but I don't have a 64-bit test host (yet
- probably will soon).
How do you want to handle this? (How's mantis coming
OK, that makes sense they are all successfully using the same
IP/certificate.
According to what I've read and what I'm trying to do is have each
domain answer to it's root instead of sub directory and each have it's
own certificate. ie.
http://mail.example.com redirects to
CJ,
Can one use an IP certificate for a 'name' based virtual domain?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 2:41 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Webmail SSL
OK, that makes sense they
Right. This is what CJ's trying to overcome by using NSI, which is a
relatively recent enhancement to the TLS spec.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Scott Hughes wrote:
From the comments in httpd.conf:
# NOTE: NameVirtualHost cannot be used without a port specifier
# (e.g. :80) if mod_ssl is being used,
Eric S.,
Yes! I didn't think it was possible. Has anyone gotten NSI to work?
Eric B.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:07 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Webmail SSL
Right. This is what
Scott Hughes wrote:
Gottcha. Where can one look at this? I can't seem to find it via
Google. o.O
On 6/6/10 9:06 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Right. This is what CJ's trying to overcome by using NSI, which is a
relatively recent enhancement to the TLS spec.
Oops. That's SNI. CJ posted this
On 6/6/10 10:00 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Scott Hughes wrote:
Gottcha. Where can one look at this? I can't seem to find it via
Google. o.O
On 6/6/10 9:06 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Right. This is what CJ's trying to overcome by using NSI, which is a
relatively recent enhancement to the TLS
On 06/06/2010 01:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jake, this looks like a bug in the qmail-toaster.spec file. I'd
suggest that Eli file a bug report, but Mantis isn't up yet. I can
have a look at the spec file myself, but I don't have a 64-bit test
host (yet - probably will soon).
How do you
On 06/06/2010 11:47 PM, Kent Busbee wrote:
I would love to see that answer. Thanks for your help. Anyone else want
to chime in here?
See response below; Scott Hughes wrote:
I believe Jake answered a similar or same question for me, but I can't
seem to find it. I was getting the same
15 matches
Mail list logo
