Hi All
Need to know 2 things 1st one I have all ways had
SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can take
up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message filters to be done
and if I have to go
Matt Decker wrote:
I'm migrating my qmail toaster from a site wide spamassassin setup to
a per user (MySQL based) setup. The problem I had with this was that
simscan doesn't know the final main account delivery email address for
forwards and domain aliases. This is also a problem when email
alvis bond wrote:
Dear. Guru
I have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing
that qmail can do.
i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted
that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue
waiting to send or receive, normally
NoZy wrote:
Hi All
Need to know 2 things 1st one I have all ways had
SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can take
up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message filters to be done
and
On 11/11/06, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simscan setting is for when messages get deleted. You will not get
any messages put into a spam box unless you install and configure the
devel branch of qmail-toaster right now. Spamassassin *ONLY* scores
messages, nothing else. Simscan
It isn't a firewall issue but I have to open relay only it's being resolves...
Seems like it can't authenticate the external users...
When I try to send from 127.0.0.1 (mail server itself) it allows me to relay...
Please advice.
- Original Message From: David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL
Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
where to go.
I can not figure out what is wrong.
Please help me.
Razvan
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable
Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then send
us the output of qmailctl stat
This happens with all e-mail?
Only with certain domains?
Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous. Thanks.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
I did,
when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
even spam is up (alw, I did not modify /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
very strange.
My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is
Would you show us your tcp.smtp?
Best regards,
Bill
On 11/13/06, Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't a firewall issue but I have to open relay only it's being resolves...
Seems like it can't authenticate the external users...
When I try to send from 127.0.0.1 (mail server
I'm guessing somewhere near the tail end of the delivery process, like
qmail-local or maildrop. I don't know where/how maildrop hooks in, but
that's where I'd look. Maybe 'tee' off a copy to a backup directory under
the user's directory.
Bill Kwok wrote:
Hi Eric,
If it is not too much
Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
(/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
I did,
when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
even spam is up (alw, I did not modify /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
install I have only one
Alex wrote:
How can I prevent emails with fake headers where the to: address is
different from where the email is actually delivered?
Spammers are getting trickier and its somehow going around my simscan.
Can I use some kind of regex matching with badmailto where it checks if
to: and
From what I can tell, taps is executed before the .qmail and/or
.qmail-default files are executed and after clam spamassassin.
Also, if you use a line such as:
.*:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To tap an entire domain, it will create an endless loop, even if the
messages are not sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried to upgrade by upgrade.sh, it's very straight forward. The only concern is that you may have to take down your qmail for a while and wait for all packages to be rebuilt.
Take a look about qmail-toaster plus: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QmailToaster-Plusand
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
should be installed.
The installation procedure is as follows:
Step 1: Rebuild Source Package
#
This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
Log looks like:
@40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
I have this result when I am doing
spamassassin -D bayes --lint
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
It's indeed not processing any mail. It's much more meaningful though to
pipe the logs through tai64nlocal so that the date/time stamps are meaningful:
# cat current | tai64nlocal
It appears that spamd is staying up though.
So, why isn't it receiving messages from simscan? I haven't a clue.
What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous. Thanks.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
ps -ef | grep spamd
root 4515 4503 0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 supervise spamd
root 4536 4515 0 18:47 pts/000:00:01 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail -s stderr
qmaill4561 4516 0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 /usr/bin/multilog t s100
n100 /var/log/qmail/spamd
I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a charm.Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I wouldto upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a
Jake Vickers wrote:
NoZy wrote:
Hi All
Need to know 2 things 1st one I have all ways had
SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can
take
up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message
Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.
I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a trivial
problem stopped the corporative mail system.
I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's
nightly, and wait for the sysadmin
Certainy, out alert system, I thinks
BTW i'm not in drugs, just typed uncarefully :-D
-Mensaje original-
De: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 18:11
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade
I totally agree, David. That's why I wrote the qtp-newmodel scripts to do
just that!
They do everything except the update ahead of time in the sandbox, so the
production server is not affected. Then at the appropriate moment, the
sysadmin can re-run the script, automatically skipping over
Great!, i was totally misunderstood :-)
I'll give it a try (or two :-P ), I promise.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
|
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas
You should not run any SA programs as root, they should be run as user
vpopmail. Try:
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D --lint
What does that say?
(I'm still grasping at straws here, but at least we can eliminate a few things)
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
I have this result when I am doing
Indeed, I second that sentiment. :)
Paco, don't forget to revert to the standard qtp-remove-pkgs script before
doing the next upgrade.
Erik Espinoza wrote:
All I can say is thanks for the patience :)
On 11/12/06, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Victory at last!
I did as
Hi All,
I have just installed qmailtoaster from rpm source and am
interested to know that whether vpopmail can authenticate the local
(/etc/passwd) users instead of the domain users. I am asking this because
I don't have virtual domains to manage. I only have primary domain.
Do I need to
Done"Eric \"Shubes\"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed, I second that sentiment. :)Paco, don't forget to revert to the standard qtp-remove-pkgs script beforedoing the next upgrade.Erik Espinoza wrote: All I can say is thanks for the patience :) On 11/12/06, Francisco Paco Peralta <[EMAIL
I have just installed qmailtoaster from rpm source and am interested to know
that whether vpopmail can authenticate the local (/etc/passwd) users instead
of the domain users. I am asking this because I don't have virtual domains
to manage. I only have primary domain.
This can be configured,
I have noted that the restore processing in the script could use some
enhancing. Presently, it simply allows you to restore the configuration
files or bypass restoration.
Bryan, if you selected to do the restore, then this is a bug. If you chose
not to restore, then this is as it should be. Did
Eric Shubes wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
should be installed.
The installation procedure is as follows:
Step 1: Rebuild
Hi Erik and all,
Thank you for your prompt reply. Is there a way we can tweak vpopmail so
that I can use existing local users without having to create new users? OR
is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without having
to change their password and still be able to
EE,
What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?
While I'm inclined to believe that greylisting is best implemented at the
firewall, what are the drawbacks to having it in the toaster?
Original Message
Subject: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated
Hello Manoj
Thank you for your prompt reply. Is there a way we can tweak vpopmail so
that I can use existing local users without having to create new users? OR
is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without having
to change their password and still be able to manage all
$ telnet mail.domain.com 25
Trying 2.2.2.2...
Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
EHLO warren.icruise.com
250-mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
250-STARTTLS
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
Might want to check the smtp log and provide more details.
On 11/13/06, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ telnet mail.domain.com 25
Trying 2.2.2.2...
Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
When I get a chance, I'll take a look.
Is this based on the simscan-1.2 we use or the simscan-1.2.3.dspam
which they claim is simscan 1.4 on the web site?
On 11/13/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EE,
What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?
While
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
$ telnet mail.domain.com 25
Trying 2.2.2.2...
Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
EHLO warren.icruise.com
250-mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
Hi Manoj
Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in
/etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, vpopmail will
then be able to find where to deliver mail by getting the user's home path from
/etc/passwd and delivering mail to ~/Maildir
Quinn,
I may have to hit you up for your expertise.
Thanks,
Erik
On 11/13/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manoj
Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in
/etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, vpopmail will
then
+1
Yay! Greylisting!
Quinn
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:20:20 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
EE,
What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?
While I'm inclined to believe that greylisting is best implemented at the
firewall, what are the drawbacks to having it in
Hi Quinn,
Thank you for your answer. I am using qmail (6 year old) in ~/Maildir
format. I am replacing my current server with fressh Fedora 5 installation.
I like qmailtoaster package since it has integrated all supported packages
that I want except I donot have plan to host multiple
Quinn,
There is a placeholder on the wiki for upgrading from sendmail. Would you
care to get the content started?
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Hi Manoj
Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in
/etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it,
EE,
Please have a look at this patch too when you get a chance (not a high
priority methinks). I like this one better, as it is implemented nearer the
front of the process in qmail-smtp instead of in simscan. I still think a
firewall implementation would be best though.
Thanks for looking into
Most certainly. I will do it when I have a free afternoon -- although those are
getting rare these days.
I also have a collection of shell and perl scripts (some quite large) I used to
automate my sendmail-qmail transfer, although any who uses them will most
certainly need to read and fully
I'm not sure about your specific environment, but in my experience the things
that helped me the most in blocking spam are:
- enable network tests
- enable the URIDNSBL plugin (init.pre)
- using sa-update with the spamassassin and SARE rule sets.
The SARE rules helped the most with stock quote
I try install qmail-toaster on Fedora Core 6 but it's any problem with
qmail-smtp.
Local messages send by command mail are OK.
Problem is with remote:
code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by
Ryan Gibbons wrote:
My server (not just my domain) is getting hit hard
with
spam related to stock quotes. It is plan text, no links no html, and
of course the envlope changes each time. I have go through with
sa-learn and try to mark them individually but they are still getting
through,
Maybe doing in drugs is worth trying, maybe it imporove the carefullness. ;P
Q
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:15:16 +0100, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
Certainy, out alert system, I thinks
BTW i'm not in drugs, just typed uncarefully :-D
Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install all
of the dependencies from fdr6064-deps.sh?
On 11/13/06, Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try install qmail-toaster on Fedora Core 6 but it's any problem with
qmail-smtp.
Local messages send by command mail are OK.
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Email: 5034 Autolearn: 417 AvgScore: 12.18 AvgScanTime: 6.02 sec
Spam: 3518 Autolearn: 341 AvgScore: 18.24 AvgScanTime: 6.11 sec
Ham: 1516 Autolearn:76 AvgScore: -1.89 AvgScanTime: 5.79 sec
Time Spent Running SA: 8.41 hours
Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:10, Erik Espinoza napisał:
Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install all
of the dependencies from fdr6064-deps.sh?
Yes, all build process on this machine by fdr6064-install-script. Only
vpopmail build without --disable-many-domains.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Email: 5034 Autolearn: 417 AvgScore: 12.18 AvgScanTime:
6.02 sec
Spam: 3518 Autolearn: 341 AvgScore: 18.24 AvgScanTime:
6.11 sec
Ham: 1516 Autolearn:76 AvgScore: -1.89 AvgScanTime:
5.79 sec
Time Spent Running
No, it is spamassassin-toaster. I just modified these two lines in sa-stats:
if (!defined $LOG_DIR) { $LOG_DIR=/var/log/qmail/spamd }
if (!defined $FILE) { $FILE='^current$' } # regex
It seems to work though.
Quinn
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:12:02 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
Not to be off-topic
Good to know. I haven't explored to much, but I'll start by setting use_pyzor 0
and seeing if the scan time speeds up. My AvgScanTime is roughly 3x as much as
yours. What is your SA configuration? Plugins? local.cf? Why so fast?
Q
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:21:13 +0100, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Cool. I've added it with these changes to the next qmailtoaster-plus release.
If anyone's itching for it right away, I can cut a release. Otherwise, I'll
wait for a few more changes before cutting v0.2.1.
Quinn Comendant wrote:
No, it is spamassassin-toaster. I just modified these two lines in
Same plugins with the official init.pre and its 3 plugs enabled
v310.pre standard v312.pre standard
1 extra plugin imageinfo (http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm)
no pyzor , no dcc but razor2
a bunch of rules from rules emporium
TRUSTED_RULESETS=SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 TRIPWIRE SARE_RANDOM
Now that I have qmailtoaster running and doing so well, I'm trying to
get qmailadmin working. I have apache2 configured with suexec. All cgi
scripts have to be in /var/www and a virtual host has to be configured
to set SuexecUserGroup to run cgi scripts. How can I get qmailadmin
working in
That didn't work. I think you have to set SuexecUserGroup to which
user you want to have access but this is set in the VirtualHost
directive.
I found this link but I'm not sure if it applies.
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/trustix_notes.eml.html
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Do you know if it
I don't know if this helps or not, but in my case I was required to
rename qmailadmin to index.cgi, and change it's ownership to vpopmail
and vchkpw. This user and group was given a UID and GID 500.
Also, I had to recompile suexec using the directions from the link
below so that I could
It seems likely that something isn't installing completely with your
toaster. For spam and clam scanning to be enabled (and show in the headers)
they must be installed, functional, and detected by simscan at the point
it's updated. Run this from the command line and see if it shows in your
Hi Eric
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:10 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
I can't help you with the Squirrelmail filters since I've never used them.
Me too.
Thats Cool may go see the Squrrel Mail List
(it ment to fork but I don't think it does )
What do you mean by updated to the new ones out?
Im thinking of using the QmailToaster Plus to upgrade my old (read 18 months) Toaster install - Im not sure if its been covered, but this will continue to run the current qmail setup, build the new version in the background and then copy over and restart to run the new version of the toaster with
Hi - Ive been closely following the DSPAM thread with great interest.Recently I have come across another tool called ASSP. Has anyone used this before? What were the results? Also, Id be interested in hearing opinions on the quality of the different spam tools - spamassassin, DSPAM, ASSP, anything
Hello,
I got the same problem whateverthis spam is.
It has been sent as plain text message only.
Thanks for any ideas,
B/R Ole J
Copy of content:
---
Symbol: MXXR
Current price: Around $0.018
Short Term Target:$0.10
Long Term Target: $0.45
Results from MXXR's latest
69 matches
Mail list logo
