[qmailtoaster] Spamd and SquirrelMail

2006-11-13 Thread NoZy
Hi All

Need to know 2 things 1st one  I have all ways had

SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can take
up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message filters to be done
and if I have to go back to the in box bang 3 more mins.

Next 1 is spam filters, I have updated my qmail to the new ones out and
now am getting a very hi system load from spamd child on both servers as
you can see on Fig 1 and Fig 2 this is now getting that high that webmail
can get hard to use at times and she does miss over 70% of the spam and
now not sure what to do about this,

Fig 1
top - 22:13:37 up 90 days, 44 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.48, 0.70, 0.77
Tasks: 131 total,   3 running, 127 sleeping,   1 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 50.2% us,  0.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 49.8% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   1025424k total,  1010464k used,14960k free, 6016k buffers
Swap:  2104432k total,   926304k used,  1178128k free,42056k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
14195 vpopmail  25   0  506m 379m 2488 R  100 37.9  12:37.87 spamd child


Fig 2
top - 22:28:20 up  2:17,  2 users,  load average: 1.79, 1.87, 1.33
Tasks: 138 total,   2 running, 136 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 49.8% us,  1.5% sy,  0.0% ni,  0.0% id, 48.3% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.5% si
Mem:   1025424k total,  1010604k used,14820k free, 9628k buffers
Swap:  2104496k total,   830572k used,  1273924k free,   147788k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 3582 vpopmail  25   0  506m 388m 2196 R   99 38.8  32:10.79 spamd child

Thanks 


-- 
Nozy
www.mozysswamp.org
Urbandead User 538147
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=538147


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] using (dot) .qmail instead of simscan

2006-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers

Matt Decker wrote:
I'm migrating my qmail toaster from a site wide spamassassin setup to 
a per user (MySQL based) setup.  The problem I had with this was that 
simscan doesn't know the final main account delivery email address for 
forwards and domain aliases.  This is also a problem when email has 
multiple recipients because it doesn't know which address to use when 
calling for the userprefs AND bayes in MySQL.  The end result is that 
if you use bayes in this setup and someone has several alias accounts, 
those alias accounts will end up in bayes as well instead of 
everything just going into one main email address/account.  Also 
whitelisting via userprefs will only work when mail is sent to the 
main email address and not aliases.


This makes bayes and userprefs in a per user MySQL environment 
unusable with simscan.


So I found a solution that works.  But I'm not sure if there are 
negative implications in doing this (i.e. Performance issues, dropped 
emails, etc).


I changed the following to get a per user MySQL Spamassassin setup 
working correctly:
1. I disabled spam scanning via simcontrol file 
(/var/qmail/control/simcontrol - spam=no)
2. Created a .qmail file in my account folder 
(/home/vpopmail/domains/somedomain.com/someuser/) that contains the 
following:
|/usr/bin/spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/preline 
/usr/bin/maildrop -A 'Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster' 
/etc/mail/mailfilter


So it feeds the message through the spamc client and then into the 
mailfilter script which puts my spam in my spam folder.


It seems to work great.  I just wonder once I put it into production 
with over 100 domains how well it will work.  I know I'll have to 
write some scripts to update everyone's .qmail file, but that is fine 
as long as I know it will work under a load.


Any thoughts or advice?
The mailfilter script is now back into the main distribution. You just 
have to turn it on by compiling maildrop-toaster and qmailadmin-toaster 
(it will give each user the Spam detection check box in QMail-Admin 
they can turn on/off:
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 --define 'spambox 1' 
qmailadmin-toaster-*.src.rpm
Might make things a little easier for you, since the user can select the 
check box which will in turn edit the .qmail file file and create a box 
called Spam.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail mail queue get filled up

2006-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers

alvis bond wrote:

Dear. Guru
 
I have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing 
that qmail can do.
i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted 
that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue 
waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete these queue from 
webmin web base linux manager. is there any way i can reduce this 
queue overhead, where do i start to check where is wrong... Please 
advice as i am newbie to linux and qmail
 


You may also try lowering your queuelifetime to help clean the messages 
out of the queue in a timely manner. Default is 5 days, but I prefer to 
put it at something like 2-3 hours for production servers. That way if a 
user sends a message and it is to a wrong recipient or something they 
get a bounce message back the same business day, instead of the next week.



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamd and SquirrelMail

2006-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers

NoZy wrote:

Hi All

Need to know 2 things 1st one  I have all ways had

SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can take
up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message filters to be done
and if I have to go back to the in box bang 3 more mins.

Next 1 is spam filters, I have updated my qmail to the new ones out and
now am getting a very hi system load from spamd child on both servers as
you can see on Fig 1 and Fig 2 this is now getting that high that webmail
can get hard to use at times and she does miss over 70% of the spam and
now not sure what to do about this,

Fig 1
top - 22:13:37 up 90 days, 44 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.48, 0.70, 0.77
Tasks: 131 total,   3 running, 127 sleeping,   1 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 50.2% us,  0.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 49.8% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   1025424k total,  1010464k used,14960k free, 6016k buffers
Swap:  2104432k total,   926304k used,  1178128k free,42056k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
14195 vpopmail  25   0  506m 379m 2488 R  100 37.9  12:37.87 spamd child


Fig 2
top - 22:28:20 up  2:17,  2 users,  load average: 1.79, 1.87, 1.33
Tasks: 138 total,   2 running, 136 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 49.8% us,  1.5% sy,  0.0% ni,  0.0% id, 48.3% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.5% si
Mem:   1025424k total,  1010604k used,14820k free, 9628k buffers
Swap:  2104496k total,   830572k used,  1273924k free,   147788k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 3582 vpopmail  25   0  506m 388m 2196 R   99 38.8  32:10.79 spamd child

  

I can't help you with the Squirrelmail filters since I've never used them.
What do you mean by updated to the new ones out?  The newest 
spamassassin-toaster, or did you download the newest source code and 
compile it yourself? Do you mean you added additional rules form 
somewhere, and if so, which ones? Thanks.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam Box

2006-11-13 Thread Peter Peltonen

On 11/11/06, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The simscan setting is for when messages get deleted. You will not get
any messages put into a spam box unless you install and configure the
devel branch of qmail-toaster right now. Spamassassin *ONLY* scores
messages, nothing else. Simscan (controlled by simcontrol) determines
what things get blocked, and when emails get deleted (when they reach
the spam= score you define).


But this could be done with mailfilter, yes?

Where does one find documentation for Qmailtoaster how to make a
maildrop filter that catches messages with specific headers (for eg
Subjects marked as spam)? Searching the wiki
with phrase maildrop ended up with 0 results.

Regards,
Peter

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused

2006-11-13 Thread Gabriel Lai
It isn't a firewall issue but I have to open relay only it's being resolves...

Seems like it can't authenticate the external users...

When I try to send from 127.0.0.1 (mail server itself) it allows me to relay...

Please advice.
- Original Message From: David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.comSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 4:58:12 PMSubject: RE: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused


Looks like a firewall issue to me...






De: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 6:22Para: Qmail Toaster ListAsunto: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused


Hello all,

Please take a look on connection refused. Need help urgently..

@400045580031147b109c tcpserver: status: 1/100@400045580031147b2bf4 tcpserver: pid 3299 from 192.168.150.250@400045580031147b33c4 tcpserver: ok 3299 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1834@400045580031160a2c7c tcpserver: status: 2/100@40004558003116232ed4 tcpserver: pid 3300 from 192.168.150.250@40004558003116234644 tcpserver: ok 3300 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1835@40004558003b0b385e2c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt  : sender accepted@40004558003b37fd947c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient@40004558003c08160f8c connect(): Connection refused@40004558003c084d445c tcpserver: end 3299 status 0
Please..
BEGIN:VCARDVERSION:2.1N:Sánchez Martín;DavidFN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas TecnologíasTITLE:Administrador de SistemasTEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1aLABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1aURL;WORK:http://www.e2000.esEMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]REV:20060705T152542ZEND:VCARD
- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Hainarosie Razvan
Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
where to go.
I can not figure out what is wrong.

Please help me.
Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
 qmailtoaster package.
 The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:

 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
  by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12
 Nov
 2006 11:42:22 -
 Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not
 designate permitted sender hosts)
 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s
  scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186
 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100)
  by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: test
 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA==

 Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav:
 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line
 Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it.
 PLease help me,
 Thanks,
 Razvan

 What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain?

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 my simcontrol file is:

 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 and my tcp.smtp file look like this
 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread David Sánchez Martín
Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then send
us the output of qmailctl stat


This happens with all e-mail? 

Only with certain domains?

Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

-Mensaje original-
De: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 16:34
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
where to go.
I can not figure out what is wrong.

Please help me.
Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of 
 qmailtoaster package.
 The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:

 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
  by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 
 12 Nov
 2006 11:42:22 -
 Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not 
 designate permitted sender hosts)
 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s
  scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186
 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100)
  by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: test
 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA==

 Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav:
 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line
 Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it.
 PLease help me,
 Thanks,
 Razvan

 What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain?

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 my simcontrol file is:

 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 and my tcp.smtp file look like this

127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT
=15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCP
TLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

:allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONG
RCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread jeremy
How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.  I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.  Thanks.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Hainarosie Razvan
I did,
when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
very strange.
My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.

Thanks,
Razvan



 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
  |
 E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
   Mediadores de Seguros  |
  |
 Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
  |
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

 -Mensaje original-
 De: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 16:34
 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

 Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
 I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
 where to go.
 I can not figure out what is wrong.

 Please help me.
 Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
 qmailtoaster package.
 The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:

 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
  by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP;
 12 Nov
 2006 11:42:22 -
 Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not
 designate permitted sender hosts)
 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s
  scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186
 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100)
  by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: test
 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA==

 Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav:
 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line
 Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it.
 PLease help me,
 Thanks,
 Razvan

 What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain?

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 my simcontrol file is:

 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 and my tcp.smtp file look like this

 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT
 =15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCP
 TLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan

 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONG
 RCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org

Re: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused

2006-11-13 Thread Bill Kwok
Would you show us your tcp.smtp?

Best regards,
Bill
On 11/13/06, Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



It isn't a firewall issue but I have to open relay only it's being resolves...

Seems like it can't authenticate the external users...

When I try to send from 127.0.0.1 (mail server itself) it allows me to relay...


Please advice.

- Original Message From: David Sánchez Martín [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.comSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 4:58:12 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused
Looks like a firewall issue to me...






De: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 6:22Para: Qmail Toaster ListAsunto: [qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused


Hello all,

Please take a look on connection refused. Need help urgently..

@400045580031147b109c tcpserver: status: 1/100@400045580031147b2bf4 tcpserver: pid 3299 from 192.168.150.250
@400045580031147b33c4 tcpserver: ok 3299 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1834
@400045580031160a2c7c tcpserver: status: 2/100@40004558003116232ed4 tcpserver: pid 3300 from 192.168.150.250
@40004558003116234644 tcpserver: ok 3300 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1835
@40004558003b0b385e2c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt  : sender accepted@40004558003b37fd947c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient@40004558003c08160f8c connect(): Connection refused@40004558003c084d445c tcpserver: end 3299 status 0
Please..
BEGIN:VCARDVERSION:2.1N:Sánchez Martín;DavidFN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (
[EMAIL PROTECTED])ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas TecnologíasTITLE:Administrador de SistemasTEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1aURL;WORK:
http://www.e2000.esEMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]REV:20060705T152542ZEND:VCARD
- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
http://www.vr.org-To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Best regards,Bill 


Re: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I'm guessing somewhere near the tail end of the delivery process, like
qmail-local or maildrop. I don't know where/how maildrop hooks in, but
that's where I'd look. Maybe 'tee' off a copy to a backup directory under
the user's directory.

Bill Kwok wrote:
 Hi Eric,
  
 If it is not too much trouble, would you give me more hint about which
 part I can tap to the system and get a copy of all emails?
  
 Thanks in advance.
  
 Best regards,
 Bill
 
  
 On 11/13/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 Perhaps you could use the 'tee' command somewhere along the process to
 create a backup copy. I haven't thought this through, but I know
 that 'tee'
 can be handy for splitting off copies.
 
 Bill Kwok wrote:
  Actually, I've tried to use scripts to filter emails for a user after
  she's lost all her email in her computer.  As I've mentioned
 before, if
  the user is in the bcc list, we may not be able to find any info
 of this
  user from the email header.  My script has to go through the send
 log in
  order to find out which email the user should has received and
 who's the
  sender.  Then by comparing the time stamp and the sender of emails, I
  can locate the email.
 
  My worry is that the possibility of getting wrong email is still high.
  For example, if a sender sent multiple emails, with different
  sizes, within short period of time, will the send log record emails in
  way which is different from the time stamp of the email files?
 
  Would anyone show me a better way to filter out the emails?
 
 
  Best regards,
  Bill
 
  On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Dear all,
  
   I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming /
 outgoing
  emails
   of
   my.domain.com http://my.domain.com http://my.domain.com/:
  
   .*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   My questions are:
  
  1. Will it create an endless loop if, by any means,
 someone sends
  email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
 
  Don't know, test it!
 
  2. Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as the
  destination, such as ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):/backup/$1 ?
 
  I think you can't but you can allways make a an email account and
  modify
  it's .qmail for putting all the mail on a specific maildir or
 whatever
 
  3. If I need to restore emails (both incoming and
 outgoing) for a
  user, what's the best way to filter it out from the
  backup?  Problem
   here is
  that emails were forwarded to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].  The
  information of recipient will be lost if he/she was only
 in the
  cc or
   bcc
  list.
 
 
  Tap is not thought exactly for backups and restores.
 
  Is for archiving (say, monitoring, legal obligations, limited
 backup of
  certain email etc)
 
  I'm certainly sure that you can allways make scripts for finding
  specific
  e-mails, anyway.
 
 
 
  4. If I can't use taps to backup / rstore my users' email in
  that way,
  is there any utility that I can use?
 
  A plain old backup utility should work, tar for example.
 
  I use amanda (http://www.amanda.org/) for network backups of
 whole racks
  and works like a charm, but you can allways use a priopietary
 one like
  Veritas BackupExec or something like that.
 
 
   Thanks in advance.
   Best regards,
   Bill
  
 
 
 --
 -Eric 'shubes'


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
(/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I did,
 when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
 even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
 install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
 very strange.
 My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Razvan
 
 
 
 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
  |
 E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
   Mediadores de Seguros  |
  |
 Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
  |
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

 -Mensaje original-
 De: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 16:34
 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

 Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
 I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
 where to go.
 I can not figure out what is wrong.

 Please help me.
 Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
 qmailtoaster package.
 The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:

 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
  by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP;
 12 Nov
 2006 11:42:22 -
 Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not
 designate permitted sender hosts)
 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s
  scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186
 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100)
  by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: test
 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA==

 Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav:
 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line
 Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it.
 PLease help me,
 Thanks,
 Razvan

 What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain?

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 my simcontrol file is:

 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 and my tcp.smtp file look like this

 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT
 =15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCP
 TLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONG
 RCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan


 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Preventing Fake Headers

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Alex wrote:
 How can I prevent emails with fake headers where the to: address is
 different from where the email is actually delivered?
 
 Spammers are getting trickier and its somehow going around my simscan.
 Can I use some kind of regex matching with badmailto where it checks if
 to: and deliver-to: address are the same?
 
 

This is not possible due to bcc: functionality. If you were to do this, bcc:
would not work.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps

2006-11-13 Thread jason p
From what I can tell, taps is executed before the .qmail and/or
.qmail-default files are executed and after clam  spamassassin.

Also, if you use a line such as:

.*:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To tap an entire domain, it will create an endless loop, even if the
messages are not sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  What I've done is set up a
faux domain to handle the taps, with a line such as:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

While logs.my.domain.com doesn't exist, my.domain.com does.  You would need
to set one of these up for each individual domain, however they could all
forward to the same account.  Just make sure not to tap the logging domain,
or you will get into another endless loop...

Hope this makes sense.  If anyone sees anything incorrect, please correct
me. :)

-Jason



-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:02 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps

I'm guessing somewhere near the tail end of the delivery process, like
qmail-local or maildrop. I don't know where/how maildrop hooks in, but
that's where I'd look. Maybe 'tee' off a copy to a backup directory under
the user's directory.

Bill Kwok wrote:
 Hi Eric,
  
 If it is not too much trouble, would you give me more hint about which
 part I can tap to the system and get a copy of all emails?
  
 Thanks in advance.
  
 Best regards,
 Bill
 
  
 On 11/13/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 Perhaps you could use the 'tee' command somewhere along the process to
 create a backup copy. I haven't thought this through, but I know
 that 'tee'
 can be handy for splitting off copies.
 
 Bill Kwok wrote:
  Actually, I've tried to use scripts to filter emails for a user
after
  she's lost all her email in her computer.  As I've mentioned
 before, if
  the user is in the bcc list, we may not be able to find any info
 of this
  user from the email header.  My script has to go through the send
 log in
  order to find out which email the user should has received and
 who's the
  sender.  Then by comparing the time stamp and the sender of emails,
I
  can locate the email.
 
  My worry is that the possibility of getting wrong email is still
high.
  For example, if a sender sent multiple emails, with different
  sizes, within short period of time, will the send log record emails
in
  way which is different from the time stamp of the email files?
 
  Would anyone show me a better way to filter out the emails?
 
 
  Best regards,
  Bill
 
  On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Dear all,
  
   I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming /
 outgoing
  emails
   of
   my.domain.com http://my.domain.com http://my.domain.com/:
  
   .*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   My questions are:
  
  1. Will it create an endless loop if, by any means,
 someone sends
  email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
 
  Don't know, test it!
 
  2. Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as the
  destination, such as ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):/backup/$1 ?
 
  I think you can't but you can allways make a an email account
and
  modify
  it's .qmail for putting all the mail on a specific maildir or
 whatever
 
  3. If I need to restore emails (both incoming and
 outgoing) for a
  user, what's the best way to filter it out from the
  backup?  Problem
   here is
  that emails were forwarded to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].  The
  information of recipient will be lost if he/she was only
 in the
  cc or
   bcc
  list.
 
 
  Tap is not thought exactly for backups and restores.
 
  Is for archiving (say, monitoring, legal obligations, limited
 backup of
  certain email etc)
 
  I'm certainly sure that you can allways make scripts for finding
  specific
  e-mails, anyway.
 
 
 
  4. If I can't use taps to backup / rstore my users' email
in
  that way,
  is there any utility that I can use?
 
  A plain old backup utility should work, tar for example.
 
  I use amanda 

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Bill Kwok
I've tried to upgrade by upgrade.sh, it's very straight forward. The only concern is that you may have to take down your qmail for a while and wait for all packages to be rebuilt.

Take a look about qmail-toaster plus: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QmailToaster-Plusand 
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrading. It provides you a sandbox to play with before you really apply the changes to the production system.

Best regards,
Bill
On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.I wouldto upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.Thanks.
-QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
 Erik Espinoza wrote:
 Greetings,

 I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
 (http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
 should be installed.

 The installation procedure is as follows:

 Step 1: Rebuild Source Package
 # rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
 Step 2: Stop qmail
 # service qmail stop
 Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package
 # rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
 Step 4: Install new package
 # rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm
 Step 5: Rebuild cdb's
 # service qmail cdb
 Step 6: Start qmail
 # service qmail start

 Thanks,
 Erik

 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hello
 I just upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm  but noticed a
 very big difference in the scan delay
 and a lot of warning on the bays lock file
 
 2006-11-12 23:31:41.749324500 [26901] info: prefork: child states: BIBI
 2006-11-12 23:31:47.828847500 [27855] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes
 databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
 exists
 2006-11-12 23:31:48.052835500 [26914] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes
 databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
 exists
 2006-11-12 23:31:48.535812500 [26914] info: spamd: identified spam
 (3.9/3.2) for clamav:89 in 19.5 seconds, 1024 bytes.
 
 I have a very busy smail server but I had to revert back to
 clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm
 and all went back to normal
 something like that 2006-11-12 23:37:44.078152500 [28288] info: spamd:
 clean message (2.5/3.2) for clamav:89 in 0.8 seconds, 1836 bytes.
 
 This smtp is used for scanning, with clam and spam enabled
 for about 3000 domains
 
 I installed my own 0.88.6 using the .88.5 spec file /I modified of course)
 but didnt notice that big difference
 of course I didnt test with the 3000 domains enaled on this server (will
 do maybe tomorrow)
 
 Just passing the info ...
 Cheers
 -P

I've seen this problem with SA too. I believe that the upgrade is
coincidental, but I could be wrong on this.

TTBOMK, the SA problem has to do with auto-expire kicking in. This process,
in addition to syncing the journal, can run quite some time, causing the
smtp session to time out.

In order to remedy the situation, I have done
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint
to see what the situation is, and and
# sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire
to force a sync and expiry run

You might want to add the sa-learn to a cron job and turn auto-expire off as
a permanent solution.
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Hainarosie Razvan
This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
 Log looks like:

@40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@40004557719a0696552c [2895] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@40004557719a069887ac [2895] info: spamd: server pid: 2895
@40004557719a06e5a1f4 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3128
@40004557719a073a8084 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3129
@40004557719a0756de3c [2895] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455775ca24be6904 [2895] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@4000455775cf36c752b4 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@4000455775cf36c76a24 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@4000455775cf36c779c4 [4770] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@4000455775cf36c78964 [4770] info: spamd: server pid: 4770
@4000455775cf36c7951c [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 4835
@4000455775cf36c7a4bc [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 4836
@4000455775cf36c7eef4 [4770] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455775dc0a8fe92c [4770] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@4000455775e20b9d5da4 [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@4000455775e20ba095dc [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@4000455775e20fa151e4 [4926] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@4000455775e20fa3901c [4926] info: spamd: server pid: 4926
@4000455775e20feca70c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 5012
@4000455775e2103c651c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 5013
@4000455775e21059d444 [4926] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455782f82a7b2134 [4926] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@400045589c531cca913c [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@400045589c531e2ad8d4 [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@400045589c532cbe4304 [2899] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@400045589c532cc0890c [2899] info: spamd: server pid: 2899
@400045589c532d0959ac [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3135
@400045589c532d5a198c [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3136
@400045589c532d789a24 [2899] info: prefork: child states: II

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:05 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
(/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I did,
 when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
 even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
 install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
 very strange.
 My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Razvan
 
 
 
 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
  |
 E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
   Mediadores de Seguros  |
  |
 Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
  |
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

 -Mensaje original-
 De: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 16:34
 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

 Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
 I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
 where to go.
 I can not figure out what is wrong.

 Please help me.
 Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 

RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Hainarosie Razvan
I have this result when I am doing

 spamassassin -D bayes --lint
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[4142] dbg: bayes: not scoring message, returning undef
[4142] dbg: bayes: opportunistic call attempt failed, DB not readable
[4142] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'RAZOR2_CHECK'
[4142] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'

What shall I do?
Thanks,
Razvan


-Original Message-
From: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:28 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
 Log looks like:

@40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@40004557719a0696552c [2895] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@40004557719a069887ac [2895] info: spamd: server pid: 2895
@40004557719a06e5a1f4 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3128
@40004557719a073a8084 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3129
@40004557719a0756de3c [2895] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455775ca24be6904 [2895] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@4000455775cf36c752b4 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@4000455775cf36c76a24 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@4000455775cf36c779c4 [4770] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@4000455775cf36c78964 [4770] info: spamd: server pid: 4770
@4000455775cf36c7951c [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 4835
@4000455775cf36c7a4bc [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 4836
@4000455775cf36c7eef4 [4770] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455775dc0a8fe92c [4770] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@4000455775e20b9d5da4 [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@4000455775e20ba095dc [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@4000455775e20fa151e4 [4926] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@4000455775e20fa3901c [4926] info: spamd: server pid: 4926
@4000455775e20feca70c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 5012
@4000455775e2103c651c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 5013
@4000455775e21059d444 [4926] info: prefork: child states: II
@4000455782f82a7b2134 [4926] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
@400045589c531cca913c [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@400045589c531e2ad8d4 [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
@400045589c532cbe4304 [2899] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 3.1.7)
@400045589c532cc0890c [2899] info: spamd: server pid: 2899
@400045589c532d0959ac [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3135
@400045589c532d5a198c [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
child process, pid 3136
@400045589c532d789a24 [2899] info: prefork: child states: II

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:05 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
(/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I did,
 when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
 even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
 install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
 very strange.
 My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.
 
 Thanks,
 Razvan
 
 
 
 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
   

Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
It's indeed not processing any mail. It's much more meaningful though to
pipe the logs through tai64nlocal so that the date/time stamps are meaningful:
# cat current | tai64nlocal
It appears that spamd is staying up though.

So, why isn't it receiving messages from simscan? I haven't a clue.

What do you get from:
# ps -ef | grep spamd

You should get something very similar to:
root 13355 13343  0 Nov08 pts/400:00:00 supervise spamd
qmaill   13370 13369  0 Nov08 pts/400:00:03 /usr/bin/multilog t s100
n100 /var/log/qmail/spamd
root 13394 13355  0 Nov08 pts/400:04:05 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail -s stderr
vpopmail 30613 13394  0 Nov12 pts/400:00:48 spamd child
vpopmail 18472 13394  2 05:11 pts/400:07:27 spamd child
root 25266 13241  0 09:42 pts/400:00:00 grep spamd

Is there anything different here besides the PIDs and date/times?
I'm grasping at straws here.

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
  Log looks like:
 
 @40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @40004557719a0696552c [2895] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @40004557719a069887ac [2895] info: spamd: server pid: 2895
 @40004557719a06e5a1f4 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3128
 @40004557719a073a8084 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3129
 @40004557719a0756de3c [2895] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775ca24be6904 [2895] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775cf36c752b4 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c76a24 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c779c4 [4770] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775cf36c78964 [4770] info: spamd: server pid: 4770
 @4000455775cf36c7951c [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4835
 @4000455775cf36c7a4bc [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4836
 @4000455775cf36c7eef4 [4770] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775dc0a8fe92c [4770] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775e20b9d5da4 [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20ba095dc [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20fa151e4 [4926] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775e20fa3901c [4926] info: spamd: server pid: 4926
 @4000455775e20feca70c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5012
 @4000455775e2103c651c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5013
 @4000455775e21059d444 [4926] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455782f82a7b2134 [4926] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @400045589c531cca913c [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @400045589c531e2ad8d4 [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @400045589c532cbe4304 [2899] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @400045589c532cc0890c [2899] info: spamd: server pid: 2899
 @400045589c532d0959ac [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3135
 @400045589c532d5a198c [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3136
 @400045589c532d789a24 [2899] info: prefork: child states: II
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:05 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!
 
 Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
 (/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?
 
 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I did,
 when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
 even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
 install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
 very strange.
 My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.

 Thanks,
 Razvan



 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify something in /etc/mail/spamassassin/* ?





 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL 

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Ryan Gibbons




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.  I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.  Thanks.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

I just did it last night no problems.

Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any
upgrade can be. It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so
that your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it
just copies over the files and restarts the services.





RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Hainarosie Razvan
 ps -ef | grep spamd
root  4515  4503  0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 supervise spamd
root  4536  4515  0 18:47 pts/000:00:01 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail -s stderr
qmaill4561  4516  0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 /usr/bin/multilog t s100
n100 /var/log/qmail/spamd
vpopmail  4600  4536  0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 spamd child
vpopmail  4601  4536  0 18:47 pts/000:00:00 spamd child
root  4709  4690  0 18:51 ?00:00:00 sh -c su root -c ps\ \-ef\
\|\ grep\ spamd 21
root  4710  4709  0 18:51 ?00:00:00 su root -c ps -ef | grep
spamd
root  4711  4710  0 18:51 ?00:00:00 bash -c ps -ef | grep spamd
root  4713  4711  0 18:51 ?00:00:00 grep spamd

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:47 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

It's indeed not processing any mail. It's much more meaningful though to
pipe the logs through tai64nlocal so that the date/time stamps are
meaningful:
# cat current | tai64nlocal
It appears that spamd is staying up though.

So, why isn't it receiving messages from simscan? I haven't a clue.

What do you get from:
# ps -ef | grep spamd

You should get something very similar to:
root 13355 13343  0 Nov08 pts/400:00:00 supervise spamd
qmaill   13370 13369  0 Nov08 pts/400:00:03 /usr/bin/multilog t s100
n100 /var/log/qmail/spamd
root 13394 13355  0 Nov08 pts/400:04:05 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail -s stderr
vpopmail 30613 13394  0 Nov12 pts/400:00:48 spamd child
vpopmail 18472 13394  2 05:11 pts/400:07:27 spamd child
root 25266 13241  0 09:42 pts/400:00:00 grep spamd

Is there anything different here besides the PIDs and date/times?
I'm grasping at straws here.

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
  Log looks like:
 
 @40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @40004557719a0696552c [2895] info: spamd: server started on port
783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @40004557719a069887ac [2895] info: spamd: server pid: 2895
 @40004557719a06e5a1f4 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3128
 @40004557719a073a8084 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3129
 @40004557719a0756de3c [2895] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775ca24be6904 [2895] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775cf36c752b4 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c76a24 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c779c4 [4770] info: spamd: server started on port
783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775cf36c78964 [4770] info: spamd: server pid: 4770
 @4000455775cf36c7951c [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4835
 @4000455775cf36c7a4bc [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4836
 @4000455775cf36c7eef4 [4770] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775dc0a8fe92c [4770] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775e20b9d5da4 [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20ba095dc [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20fa151e4 [4926] info: spamd: server started on port
783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775e20fa3901c [4926] info: spamd: server pid: 4926
 @4000455775e20feca70c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5012
 @4000455775e2103c651c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5013
 @4000455775e21059d444 [4926] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455782f82a7b2134 [4926] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @400045589c531cca913c [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @400045589c531e2ad8d4 [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @400045589c532cbe4304 [2899] info: spamd: server started on port
783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @400045589c532cc0890c [2899] info: spamd: server pid: 2899
 @400045589c532d0959ac [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3135
 @400045589c532d5a198c [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3136
 @400045589c532d789a24 [2899] info: prefork: child states: II
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:05 PM
 To: 

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Francisco Paco Peralta
I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a charm.Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.  I wouldto upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.  Thanks.- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I just did it last night no problems.  Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any upgrade can be. It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so that your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it just copies over the files and restarts the services.  Francisco "Paco" Peralta

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamd and SquirrelMail

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jake Vickers wrote:
 NoZy wrote:
 Hi All

 Need to know 2 things 1st one  I have all ways had

 SquirrelMail and filtering does someone know of a better way to message
 filter then using SquirrelMail message filtering. Why ? will it can
 take
 up to 3 mins for me to log on after all the 20 message filters to be done
 and if I have to go back to the in box bang 3 more mins.

 Next 1 is spam filters, I have updated my qmail to the new ones out and
 now am getting a very hi system load from spamd child on both
 servers as
 you can see on Fig 1 and Fig 2 this is now getting that high that webmail
 can get hard to use at times and she does miss over 70% of the spam and
 now not sure what to do about this,

 Fig 1
 top - 22:13:37 up 90 days, 44 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.48, 0.70,
 0.77
 Tasks: 131 total,   3 running, 127 sleeping,   1 stopped,   0 zombie
 Cpu(s): 50.2% us,  0.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 49.8% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi, 
 0.0% si
 Mem:   1025424k total,  1010464k used,14960k free, 6016k buffers
 Swap:  2104432k total,   926304k used,  1178128k free,42056k cached

   PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 14195 vpopmail  25   0  506m 379m 2488 R  100 37.9  12:37.87 spamd child


 Fig 2
 top - 22:28:20 up  2:17,  2 users,  load average: 1.79, 1.87, 1.33
 Tasks: 138 total,   2 running, 136 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
 Cpu(s): 49.8% us,  1.5% sy,  0.0% ni,  0.0% id, 48.3% wa,  0.0% hi, 
 0.5% si
 Mem:   1025424k total,  1010604k used,14820k free, 9628k buffers
 Swap:  2104496k total,   830572k used,  1273924k free,   147788k cached

   PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
  3582 vpopmail  25   0  506m 388m 2196 R   99 38.8  32:10.79 spamd child

   
 I can't help you with the Squirrelmail filters since I've never used them.

Me too.

 What do you mean by updated to the new ones out?  The newest
 spamassassin-toaster, or did you download the newest source code and
 compile it yourself? Do you mean you added additional rules form
 somewhere, and if so, which ones? Thanks.
 

Also, is your SA log showing any errors?

Has your SA bayes db journal ever sync'd?
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint

Has auto-expire ever completed?
# sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread David Sánchez Martín
 
Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.
 
I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a trivial
problem stopped the corporative mail system.
 
I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's
nightly, and wait for the sysadmin to tell to install in an apropriate
moment (if everything runs ok, it will take less than 2 minutes, anyway).

Just my opinion

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
http://www.e2000.es/ 
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*


 



De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script


I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server
and it worked like a charm.

Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production
server.  I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.
Thanks.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
http://www.vr.org 

- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just did it last night no problems.

Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any
upgrade can be.  It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so that
your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it just copies
over the files and restarts the services.





Francisco Paco Peralta
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread David Sánchez Martín
 
Certainy, out alert system, I thinks

BTW i'm not in drugs, just typed uncarefully :-D

-Mensaje original-
De: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 18:11
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

 
Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.
 
I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a trivial
problem stopped the corporative mail system.
 
I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's
nightly, and wait for the sysadmin to tell to install in an apropriate
moment (if everything runs ok, it will take less than 2 minutes, anyway).

Just my opinion

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
http://www.e2000.es/ 
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*


 



De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes,
13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script


I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server
and it worked like a charm.

Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production
server.  I would
to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.
Thanks.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
http://www.vr.org 

- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just did it last night no problems.

Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any
upgrade can be.  It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so that
your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it just copies
over the files and restarts the services.





Francisco Paco Peralta


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I totally agree, David. That's why I wrote the qtp-newmodel scripts to do
just that!

They do everything except the update ahead of time in the sandbox, so the
production server is not affected. Then at the appropriate moment, the
sysadmin can re-run the script, automatically skipping over everything
that's already been done, and apply the update (which is done with a single
rpm -Uvh command btw).

You might want to give it a try! ;)

David Sánchez Martín wrote:
  
 Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.
  
 I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a trivial
 problem stopped the corporative mail system.
  
 I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's
 nightly, and wait for the sysadmin to tell to install in an apropriate
 moment (if everything runs ok, it will take less than 2 minutes, anyway).
 
 Just my opinion
 
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 http://www.e2000.es/ 
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
  |
 E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
   Mediadores de Seguros  |
  |
 Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
  |
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 
 
  
 
 
 
 De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58
 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script
 
 
 I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server
 and it worked like a charm.
 
 Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production
 server.  I would
   to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.
 Thanks.
   
   
   
 -
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 http://www.vr.org 
   
 - To
 unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
 additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   I just did it last night no problems.
   
   Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any
 upgrade can be.  It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so that
 your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it just copies
 over the files and restarts the services.
   
 
 
 
 
 Francisco Paco Peralta
 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread David Sánchez Martín
 
Great!, i was totally misunderstood :-)

I'll give it a try (or two :-P ), I promise.

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

-Mensaje original-
De: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 18:22
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

I totally agree, David. That's why I wrote the qtp-newmodel scripts to do
just that!

They do everything except the update ahead of time in the sandbox, so the
production server is not affected. Then at the appropriate moment, the
sysadmin can re-run the script, automatically skipping over everything
that's already been done, and apply the update (which is done with a single
rpm -Uvh command btw).

You might want to give it a try! ;)

David Sánchez Martín wrote:
  
 Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.
  
 I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a 
 trivial problem stopped the corporative mail system.
  
 I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's 
 nightly, and wait for the sysadmin to tell to install in an apropriate 
 moment (if everything runs ok, it will take less than 2 minutes, anyway).
 
 Just my opinion
 
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  |
 David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
 http://www.e2000.es/ 
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
  |
 E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
   Mediadores de Seguros  |
  |
 Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
  |
 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 
 
  
 
 
 
 De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: 
 lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58
 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script
 
 
 I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production 
 server and it worked like a charm.
 
 Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production
server.  I 
 would
   to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.
 Thanks.
   
   
   
 -
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org 
 http://www.vr.org
   
 - 
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
 additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   I just did it last night no problems.
   
   Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any 
 upgrade can be.  It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so 
 that your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it 
 just copies over the files and restarts the services.
   
 
 
 
 
 Francisco Paco Peralta
 


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL 

Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
You should not run any SA programs as root, they should be run as user
vpopmail. Try:

# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D --lint

What does that say?
(I'm still grasping at straws here, but at least we can eliminate a few things)

Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I have this result when I am doing
 
 spamassassin -D bayes --lint
 [4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
 /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
 [4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
 /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
 [4142] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
 /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
 [4142] dbg: bayes: not scoring message, returning undef
 [4142] dbg: bayes: opportunistic call attempt failed, DB not readable
 [4142] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 [4142] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
 'DCC_CHECK'
 
 What shall I do?
 Thanks,
 Razvan
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Hainarosie Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:28 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!
 
 This is how my /var/log/qmail/spamd/current
  Log looks like:
 
 @40004557719934d7bb9c [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @40004557719934db49c4 [2895] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @40004557719a0696552c [2895] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @40004557719a069887ac [2895] info: spamd: server pid: 2895
 @40004557719a06e5a1f4 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3128
 @40004557719a073a8084 [2895] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3129
 @40004557719a0756de3c [2895] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775ca24be6904 [2895] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775cf36c752b4 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c76a24 [4770] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775cf36c779c4 [4770] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775cf36c78964 [4770] info: spamd: server pid: 4770
 @4000455775cf36c7951c [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4835
 @4000455775cf36c7a4bc [4770] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 4836
 @4000455775cf36c7eef4 [4770] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455775dc0a8fe92c [4770] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @4000455775e20b9d5da4 [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20ba095dc [4926] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @4000455775e20fa151e4 [4926] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @4000455775e20fa3901c [4926] info: spamd: server pid: 4926
 @4000455775e20feca70c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5012
 @4000455775e2103c651c [4926] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 5013
 @4000455775e21059d444 [4926] info: prefork: child states: II
 @4000455782f82a7b2134 [4926] info: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
 shutting down
 @400045589c531cca913c [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
 @400045589c531e2ad8d4 [2899] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has
 undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
 @400045589c532cbe4304 [2899] info: spamd: server started on port 783/tcp
 (running version 3.1.7)
 @400045589c532cc0890c [2899] info: spamd: server pid: 2899
 @400045589c532d0959ac [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3135
 @400045589c532d5a198c [2899] info: spamd: server successfully spawned
 child process, pid 3136
 @400045589c532d789a24 [2899] info: prefork: child states: II
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:05 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!
 
 Are you seeing any messages at all in the spamd
 (/var/log/qmail/spamd/current) log?
 
 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I did,
 when I make qmailctl cdb, qmail stop, qmail start, qmailctl stat all is up
 even spam is up (alw, I did not modify  /etc/mail/spamassasin. Is a fresh
 install I have only one domain on it and 2 email accounts for test. Is
 very strange.
 My question maybe stupid but I can not figure out what is wrong.

 Thanks,
 Razvan



 Do a qmailctl cdb (for making sure you have a good simscan.cdb) then
 send
 us the output of qmailctl stat


 This happens with all e-mail?

 Only with certain domains?

 Did you modify 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Courier Authlib problems

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Indeed, I second that sentiment. :)

Paco, don't forget to revert to the standard qtp-remove-pkgs script before
doing the next upgrade.

Erik Espinoza wrote:
 All I can say is thanks for the patience :)
 
 On 11/12/06, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Victory at last!

 I did as instructed and it worked like a charm!

 Thank you again.

 Eric \Shubes\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Indeed, courier-authlib-toaster should have been removed along with
 control-panel.

 Oops. I see the problem now. The script adds -toaster to the package
 name,
 so where I told you to add a line for courier-authlib-toaster \, it
 should
 simply be courier-authlib \. My bad.

 Please make that change and rerun qtp-newmodel, and select the option to
 build a new sandbox.

 Erik Espinoza wrote:
  Looks like the script may not have this part, but as I mentioned
  before courier-authlib-toaster needs to be removed (nodeps) before
  libtool-ltdl-devel and libtool-ltdl are installed.
 
  Erik
 
  On 11/11/06, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
  Well,
 
  Tried it again this weekend and followed the instructions. This is
  part of
  my resulting output.
 
 
 
 
  If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal
 and:
  # tail -f
 
 /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log
 
  qtp-build-rpms v0.2
  qtp-remove-pkgs v0.2
  REMOVED send-emails-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
  REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
  Setting up Install Process
  Setting up repositories
  dries 100% |=| 951 B
  00:00
  freshrpms 100% |=| 951 B
  00:00
  enlartenment 100% |=| 951 B
  00:00
  extras 100% |=| 1.1 kB
  00:00
 
 http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/pub/distributions/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:

 
  [Errno 4] IOError:
  Trying other mirror.
  updates-released 100% |=| 951 B
  00:00
  base 100% |=| 1.1 kB
  00:00
  enlartenment-sources 100% |=| 951 B
  00:00
  Reading repository metadata in from local files
  primary.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB
  00:01
  extras :
  ##
  3977/3977
  Added 2 new packages, deleted 2 old in 7.67 seconds
  Parsing package install arguments
  Resolving Dependencies
  -- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
  --- Package libtool-ltdl-devel.i386 0:1.5.16.multilib2-3 set to be
  updated
  --- Package libtool-ltdl.i386 0:1.5.16.multilib2-3 set to be updated
  -- Running transaction check
  -- Processing Conflict: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts
 libtool-ltdl
  -- Finished Dependency Resolution
  Error: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts with libtool-ltdl
  Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 ...
  Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 in the sandbox ...
  Building ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 ...
  Installing ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 in the sandbox ...
  Building vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 ...
  Installing vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 in the sandbox ...
  Building libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 ...
  Installing libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 in the
 sandbox
  ...
  Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7 ...
  Installing qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7 in the sandbox ...
  Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3 ...
  Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3 in the
  sandbox ...
  qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh failed for
  courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3
  qtp-build-rpms - see
 
 /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log
  Build failed, Exiting.
 
  Eric \Shubes\ wrote:
  Dang, I keep forgetting that! Good catch, EE.
 
  If you use
 
  yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel
 
  it'll pick them both up (libtool-ltdl is a dependency). Or, you
 could use
 
  yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel libtool-ltdl
 
  Your choice!
 
  Erik Espinoza wrote:
   Need to install libtool-ltdl-devel as well
  
   On 11/9/06, Eric Shubes wrote:
   Ok. Now that qmailtoaster-plus v0.2 is out, I think this'll be
 easy.
  
   What's happened (to refresh my memory as much as anything) is
 that the
   .so
   file that's part of libtool-ltdl was included in
   courier-authlib-toaster-0.88-1.3.1, so libtool-ltdl
  needed to be
   removed to
   install it, and now it's no longer part of
   courier-authlib-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 (and 1.3.3) and we
  need to install the
   standard libtool-ltdl.
  
   After getting qmailtoaster-plus v0.2 installed, modify
   /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-remove-pkgs as
 follows:
   .) after control-panel \ on line 72, add a new line containing
   courier-authlib-toaster \ (without the quotes), so it ends up
   looking like:
  
   control-panel \
   courier-authlib-toaster \
   spamassassin \
  
   Then after a7_remove_packages at line 114 (near the end) add a
  new line
   containing yum 

[qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Manoj Katwal



Hi All,

I have just installed qmailtoaster from rpm source and am 
interested to know that whether vpopmail can authenticate the local 
(/etc/passwd) users instead of the domain users. I am asking this because 
I don't have virtual domains to manage. I only have primary domain. 


Do I need to uninstall vpopmail and configure (may need to 
install other authentication package) qmail to authenticate the local 
users?

Please help me. 
Thanks.

M Katwal


Re: [qmailtoaster] Courier Authlib problems

2006-11-13 Thread Francisco Paco Peralta
Done"Eric \"Shubes\"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed, I second that sentiment. :)Paco, don't forget to revert to the standard qtp-remove-pkgs script beforedoing the next upgrade.Erik Espinoza wrote: All I can say is thanks for the patience :)  On 11/12/06, Francisco Paco Peralta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Victory at last! I did as instructed and it worked like a charm! Thank you again. "Eric \"Shubes\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Indeed, courier-authlib-toaster should have been removed along with control-panel. Oops. I see the problem now. The script adds "-toaster" to the package name, so where I told you to add a line for
 "courier-authlib-toaster \", it should simply be "courier-authlib \". My bad. Please make that change and rerun qtp-newmodel, and select the option to build a new sandbox. Erik Espinoza wrote:  Looks like the script may not have this part, but as I mentioned  before courier-authlib-toaster needs to be removed (nodeps) before  libtool-ltdl-devel and libtool-ltdl are installed.   Erik   On 11/11/06, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:  Well,   Tried it again this weekend and followed the instructions. This is  part of  my resulting output.   
   If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:  # tail -f  /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log   qtp-build-rpms v0.2  qtp-remove-pkgs v0.2  REMOVED send-emails-toaster from sandbox (not for real)  REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)  Setting up Install Process  Setting up repositories  dries 100% |=| 951 B  00:00  freshrpms 100% |=| 951 B  00:00  enlartenment 100% |=| 951 B  00:00  extras 100% |=| 1.1 kB  00:00
  http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/pub/distributions/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:   [Errno 4] IOError:  Trying other mirror.  updates-released 100% |=| 951 B  00:00  base 100% |=| 1.1 kB  00:00  enlartenment-sources 100% |=| 951 B  00:00  Reading repository metadata in from local files  primary.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB  00:01  extras :  ##  3977/3977  Added 2 new packages, deleted 2 old in 7.67 seconds  Parsing package install arguments
  Resolving Dependencies  -- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.  --- Package libtool-ltdl-devel.i386 0:1.5.16.multilib2-3 set to be  updated  --- Package libtool-ltdl.i386 0:1.5.16.multilib2-3 set to be updated  -- Running transaction check  -- Processing Conflict: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts libtool-ltdl  -- Finished Dependency Resolution  Error: courier-authlib-toaster conflicts with libtool-ltdl  Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 ...  Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 in the sandbox ...  Building ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 ...  Installing ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 in the sandbox ...  Building
 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 ...  Installing vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 in the sandbox ...  Building libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 ...  Installing libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 in the sandbox  ...  Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7 ...  Installing qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7 in the sandbox ...  Building courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3 ...  Installing courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3 in the  sandbox ...  qtp-build-rpms - rpm -Uvh failed for  courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.3  qtp-build-rpms - see  /opt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log  Build failed, Exiting.   "Eric \"Shubes\"" wrote:
  Dang, I keep forgetting that! Good catch, EE.   If you use   yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel   it'll pick them both up (libtool-ltdl is a dependency). Or, you could use   yum -y install libtool-ltdl-devel libtool-ltdl   Your choice!   Erik Espinoza wrote:   Need to install libtool-ltdl-devel as well On 11/9/06, Eric Shubes wrote:   Ok. Now that qmailtoaster-plus v0.2 is out, I think this'll be easy. What's happened (to refresh my memory as much as anything) is that the   .so 
  file that's part of libtool-ltdl was included in   courier-authlib-toaster-0.88-1.3.1, so libtool-ltdl  needed to be   removed to   install it, and now it's no longer part of   courier-authlib-toaster-0.88-1.3.2 (and 1.3.3) and we  need to install the   standard libtool-ltdl. After getting qmailtoaster-plus v0.2 installed, modify   /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-remove-pkgs as follows:   .) after "control-panel \" on line 72, add a new line containing   "courier-authlib-toaster \" (without the quotes), so it ends up   looking like: control-panel
 \   courier-authlib-toaster \   spamassassin \ Then after "a7_remove_packages" at line 114 (near the end) add a  new line   containing "yum -y install libtool-ltdl" so it ends up looking like: a7_remove_packages   yum 

Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

I have just installed qmailtoaster from rpm source and am interested to know
that whether vpopmail can authenticate the local (/etc/passwd) users instead
of the domain users.  I am asking this because I don't have virtual domains
to manage.  I only have primary domain.


This can be configured, aftermarket. I don't know what it'd take to do
that. I think Quinn or someone has instructions to do this.


Do I need to uninstall vpopmail and configure (may need to install other
authentication package) qmail to authenticate the local users?


Removing the vpopmail package will break the QmailToaster.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
I have noted that the restore processing in the script could use some
enhancing. Presently, it simply allows you to restore the configuration
files or bypass restoration.

Bryan, if you selected to do the restore, then this is a bug. If you chose
not to restore, then this is as it should be. Did you select to do the
restore? If you did, I need to fix the script.

Bryan Daley wrote:
 Just done my server and all is ok apart from a default tcp.smtp being
 installed which was no big issue as it backed up the original.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.  I would
 to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous.  Thanks.




-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm

2006-11-13 Thread Philip Nix Guru

Eric Shubes wrote:

Philip Nix Guru wrote:
  

Erik Espinoza wrote:


Greetings,

I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
should be installed.

The installation procedure is as follows:

Step 1: Rebuild Source Package
# rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
Step 2: Stop qmail
# service qmail stop
Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package
# rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
Step 4: Install new package
# rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm
Step 5: Rebuild cdb's
# service qmail cdb
Step 6: Start qmail
# service qmail start

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

Hello
I just upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm  but noticed a
very big difference in the scan delay
and a lot of warning on the bays lock file

2006-11-12 23:31:41.749324500 [26901] info: prefork: child states: BIBI
2006-11-12 23:31:47.828847500 [27855] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes
databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
exists
2006-11-12 23:31:48.052835500 [26914] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes
databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
exists
2006-11-12 23:31:48.535812500 [26914] info: spamd: identified spam
(3.9/3.2) for clamav:89 in 19.5 seconds, 1024 bytes.

I have a very busy smail server but I had to revert back to
clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm
and all went back to normal
something like that 2006-11-12 23:37:44.078152500 [28288] info: spamd:
clean message (2.5/3.2) for clamav:89 in 0.8 seconds, 1836 bytes.

This smtp is used for scanning, with clam and spam enabled
for about 3000 domains

I installed my own 0.88.6 using the .88.5 spec file /I modified of course)
but didnt notice that big difference
of course I didnt test with the 3000 domains enaled on this server (will
do maybe tomorrow)

Just passing the info ...
Cheers
-P



I've seen this problem with SA too. I believe that the upgrade is
coincidental, but I could be wrong on this.

TTBOMK, the SA problem has to do with auto-expire kicking in. This process,
in addition to syncing the journal, can run quite some time, causing the
smtp session to time out.

In order to remedy the situation, I have done
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint
to see what the situation is, and and
# sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire
to force a sync and expiry run

You might want to add the sa-learn to a cron job and turn auto-expire off as
a permanent solution.
  

Hello
Yes I tried again this afternoon, same bad delays
but I totally forgot about the --force-expire option to force a database 
sync and expiry run

So retried that a few minutes ago
and all seems normal with .88.6 now
Thx Eric for the reminder tip :)



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Manoj Katwal

Hi Erik and all,

Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak vpopmail so 
that I can use existing local users without having to create new users?  OR 
is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without having 
to change their password and still be able to manage all of my users that 
would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?


any help or suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks.

M Katwal




- Original Message - 
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster


I have just installed qmailtoaster from rpm source and am interested to 
know
that whether vpopmail can authenticate the local (/etc/passwd) users 
instead
of the domain users.  I am asking this because I don't have virtual 
domains

to manage.  I only have primary domain.


This can be configured, aftermarket. I don't know what it'd take to do
that. I think Quinn or someone has instructions to do this.


Do I need to uninstall vpopmail and configure (may need to install other
authentication package) qmail to authenticate the local users?


Removing the vpopmail package will break the QmailToaster.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] [Fwd: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2]

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
EE,

What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?

While I'm inclined to believe that greylisting is best implemented at the
firewall, what are the drawbacks to having it in the toaster?

 Original Message 
Subject: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:10:55 +0100
From: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi

I've updates the greylisting patch to simscan 1.2
It now uses log_message log initial blocking, and
the first successfull attempt by a sender.

greetings, Florian Pflug


!DSPAM:4558c2c627411592547952!


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'
diff -Naur simscan-1.2/configure.in simscan-1.2.greylist/configure.in
--- simscan-1.2/configure.in	2005-09-30 23:15:47.0 +0200
+++ simscan-1.2.greylist/configure.in	2006-11-12 13:12:45.0 +0100
@@ -282,6 +282,25 @@
 
 #--
 
+AC_ARG_ENABLE(greylist, [  --enable-greylist=y|n   Turn on greylisting. default no.],
+ENABLE_GREYLIST=$enableval,
+[
+  ENABLE_GREYLIST=no
+] )
+case $ENABLE_GREYLIST in
+1*|y*|Y*)
+ENABLE_GREYLIST=1
+AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([ENABLE_GREYLIST], $ENABLE_GREYLIST, [enable greylisting])
+;;
+*)
+ENABLE_GREYLIST=0
+;;
+esac
+
+AC_SUBST(ENABLE_GREYLIST)
+
+#--
+
 AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether we can locate the qmail directory)
 qmaildir=
 for f in /var/qmail
@@ -796,4 +815,14 @@
 ;;
 esac
 
+case $ENABLE_GREYLIST in
+  1*|y*|Y*)
+echo  greylisting   = ON
+;;
+
+  *)
+echo  greylisting   = OFF
+;;
+esac
+
 echo 
diff -Naur simscan-1.2/Makefile.am simscan-1.2.greylist/Makefile.am
--- simscan-1.2/Makefile.am	2004-11-04 16:27:45.0 +0100
+++ simscan-1.2.greylist/Makefile.am	2006-11-12 13:12:45.0 +0100
@@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
 	$(INSTALL) simscan @qmaildir@/bin/simscan
 	$(INSTALL) simscanmk @qmaildir@/bin/simscanmk
 	$(INSTALL) -m 750 -d @workdir@
+	test @ENABLE_GREYLIST@ = 1  $(INSTALL) -m 2750 -d @workdir@/scanner
+	test @ENABLE_GREYLIST@ = 1  $(INSTALL) -m 2750 -d @workdir@/greylist
 	strip @qmaildir@/bin/simscan
 	strip @qmaildir@/bin/simscanmk
-	chown @ENABLE_USER@ @workdir@ @qmaildir@/bin/simscan
+	chown -R @ENABLE_USER@ @workdir@ @qmaildir@/bin/simscan
 	chmod 4711 @qmaildir@/bin/simscan
 
 AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign no-dependencies 
diff -Naur simscan-1.2/simscan.c simscan-1.2.greylist/simscan.c
--- simscan-1.2/simscan.c	2005-10-05 23:12:42.0 +0200
+++ simscan-1.2.greylist/simscan.c	2006-11-12 13:26:32.0 +0100
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
 #include stdio.h
 #include stdlib.h
 #include string.h
+#include time.h
+#include utime.h
 #include sys/types.h
 #include sys/wait.h
 #include sys/stat.h
@@ -68,7 +70,6 @@
91   Envelope format error.
 */
 
-
 #ifdef QUARANTINEDIR 
 void quarantine_msg(char *message_name);
 #endif
@@ -85,6 +86,11 @@
 char message_name[BUFFER_SIZE];
 char workdir[BUFFER_SIZE];
 char unique_ext[BUFFER_SIZE];
+#ifdef ENABLE_GREYLIST
+char greylist_initial[BUFFER_SIZE];
+char greylist_allowed[BUFFER_SIZE];
+char greylist_dir[BUFFER_SIZE];
+#endif
 
 void format_dir(char *workdir);
 void exit_clean(int error_code);
@@ -123,8 +129,9 @@
 int  PerDomainSpam;
 int  PerDomainTrophie;
 int  PerDomainSpamPassthru;
-int  MaxDomains;
-char Domains[MAXDOMAINS][MAXDOMLEN];
+#ifdef ENABLE_GREYLIST
+int  PerDomainGreylist;
+#endif
 
 void set_per_domain();
 void init_per_domain();
@@ -187,7 +194,7 @@
 #endif
 
 struct timeval start,stop;
-double utime;
+double delta;
 #define SECS(tv) (tv.tv_sec + tv.tv_usec / 100.0)
 
 /* write a received line */
@@ -208,6 +215,27 @@
 
 void log_message( char *state, char *subject, int spam );
 
+#ifdef ENABLE_GREYLIST
+/*
+ * Timing for greylisting.
+ * 
+ * Algorithm: When a sender with a source ip for which no record yet exists
+ *connects, his delivery will fail with a temporary error.
+ *All following delivery attempts by that sender will fail with
+ *a temporary error too, until GREYLIST_MIN_DELAY seconds after
+ *his _first_ attempt.
+ *Delivery attempts started between GREYLIST_MIN_DELAY and 
+ *GREYLIST_MAX_DELAY seconds after the first delivery attempt 
+ *will succeed, and cause all future mails from that sender to
+ *be accepted immediatly. 
+ */
+#define GREYLIST_MIN_DELAY 60
+#define GREYLIST_MAX_DELAY 36*3600
+
+void format_greylist(char* greylist_dir, char* greylist_initial, char* greylist_allowed);
+int check_greylist();
+#endif
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 #ifdef HAS_ULIMIT_NPROC
@@ -255,9 +283,23 @@
 
   /* format the new directory name */
   format_dir(workdir);
+  
+  /* format greylist names */
+#ifdef ENABLE_GREYLIST
+  format_greylist(greylist_dir, greylist_initial, greylist_allowed);
+#endif
 
   if ( 

Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

Hello Manoj


Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak vpopmail so
that I can use existing local users without having to create new users?  OR
is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without having
to change their password and still be able to manage all of my users that
would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?


Tweaking vpopmail to use local users is fairly simple, if you are
comfortable with modifying rpm spec files. I think Quinn sent the
options that need to be changed. I'll dig it up when I get a chance,
or perhaps you can check out the archive. It was literally in the last
two days or so.

I know that Jake has a few scripts to convert local users to vpopmail
users, so maybe he'll chime in on that one.


any help or suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks.


No Problem.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] STARTTLS - Connection is closed

2006-11-13 Thread Warren (mailing lists)

$ telnet mail.domain.com 25
Trying 2.2.2.2...
Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
EHLO warren.icruise.com
250-mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
250-STARTTLS
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 20971520
250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
STARTTLS
Connection closed by foreign host.



This particular one was done by hand so that it would not be the client 
that was in question.  It happens no matter where I connect from.  What 
would cause a toaster to drop like this?


TIA,
Warren

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS - Connection is closed

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

Might want to check the smtp log and provide more details.

On 11/13/06, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

$ telnet mail.domain.com 25
Trying 2.2.2.2...
Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
EHLO warren.icruise.com
250-mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
250-STARTTLS
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 20971520
250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
STARTTLS
Connection closed by foreign host.



This particular one was done by hand so that it would not be the client
that was in question.  It happens no matter where I connect from.  What
would cause a toaster to drop like this?

TIA,
Warren

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2]

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

When I get a chance, I'll take a look.

Is this based on the simscan-1.2 we use or the simscan-1.2.3.dspam
which they claim is simscan 1.4 on the web site?

On 11/13/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

EE,

What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?

While I'm inclined to believe that greylisting is best implemented at the
firewall, what are the drawbacks to having it in the toaster?

 Original Message 
Subject: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:10:55 +0100
From: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi

I've updates the greylisting patch to simscan 1.2
It now uses log_message log initial blocking, and
the first successfull attempt by a sender.

greetings, Florian Pflug


!DSPAM:4558c2c627411592547952!


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS - Connection is closed

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
 $ telnet mail.domain.com 25
 Trying 2.2.2.2...
 Connected to mail.domain.com (2.2.2.2).
 Escape character is '^]'.
 220 mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
 EHLO warren.icruise.com
 250-mail - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server
 250-STARTTLS
 250-PIPELINING
 250-8BITMIME
 250-SIZE 20971520
 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
 STARTTLS
 Connection closed by foreign host.
 
 
 
 This particular one was done by hand so that it would not be the client
 that was in question.  It happens no matter where I connect from.  What
 would cause a toaster to drop like this?
 
 TIA,
 Warren
 

Certificate not configured correctly? Running this with a trace might help
point to the problem.

There was a similar problem on the list a while back. Check the archives.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
Hi Manoj 

Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in 
/etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, vpopmail will 
then be able to find where to deliver mail by getting the user's home path from 
/etc/passwd and delivering mail to ~/Maildir instead of into the virtual users 
directories under /home/vpopmail/domains. I'm not 100% certain on this.

Also, if users don't have mail stored under ~/Maildir (in Maildir++ format) you 
will need to migrate mail to these user maildirs. 

What kind of mail system are you migrating from? I recently did a complex 
migration from a 6-year-old sendmail server to qmail toaster so I know all the 
tricks. ;)

Quinn

-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:05:52 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09071.html
 
 Install the vpopmail rpm and edit the spec file. Under configure
 change --disable-passwd to --enable-passwd and rebuild the rpm.
 Continue as per usual install.
 
 Since this will modify the vpopmail libs, please ensure that you
 recompile the courier packages as well. Or better yet, start from
 scratch.
 
 Erik
 
 On 11/13/06, Manoj Katwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Erik,
 
 Thanks again for the super prompt reply.  I am comfortable with 
 modifyingthe
 rpm spec files.  I will follow your directions and try to find out the
 archive that explains the trick.
 
 
 Best regards,
 M Katwal
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:21 AM
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster
 
 
 Hello Manoj

 Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak 
 vpopmail so
 that I can use existing local users without having to create new users?
 OR
 is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without
 having
 to change their password and still be able to manage all of my 
 users that
 would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?

 Tweaking vpopmail to use local users is fairly simple, if you are
 comfortable with modifying rpm spec files. I think Quinn sent the
 options that need to be changed. I'll dig it up when I get a chance,
 or perhaps you can check out the archive. It was literally in the last
 two days or so.

 I know that Jake has a few scripts to convert local users to vpopmail
 users, so maybe he'll chime in on that one.

 any help or suggestion is appreciated.
 Thanks.

 No Problem.

 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
 
 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

Quinn,

I may have to hit you up for your expertise.

Thanks,
Erik

On 11/13/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Manoj

Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in 
/etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, vpopmail will 
then be able to find where to deliver mail by getting the user's home path from 
/etc/passwd and delivering mail to ~/Maildir instead of into the virtual users 
directories under /home/vpopmail/domains. I'm not 100% certain on this.

Also, if users don't have mail stored under ~/Maildir (in Maildir++ format) you 
will need to migrate mail to these user maildirs.

What kind of mail system are you migrating from? I recently did a complex 
migration from a 6-year-old sendmail server to qmail toaster so I know all the 
tricks. ;)

Quinn

-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:05:52 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09071.html

 Install the vpopmail rpm and edit the spec file. Under configure
 change --disable-passwd to --enable-passwd and rebuild the rpm.
 Continue as per usual install.

 Since this will modify the vpopmail libs, please ensure that you
 recompile the courier packages as well. Or better yet, start from
 scratch.

 Erik

 On 11/13/06, Manoj Katwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Erik,

 Thanks again for the super prompt reply.  I am comfortable with
 modifyingthe
 rpm spec files.  I will follow your directions and try to find out the
 archive that explains the trick.


 Best regards,
 M Katwal


 - Original Message -
 From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:21 AM
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster


 Hello Manoj

 Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak
 vpopmail so
 that I can use existing local users without having to create new users?
 OR
 is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without
 having
 to change their password and still be able to manage all of my
 users that
 would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?

 Tweaking vpopmail to use local users is fairly simple, if you are
 comfortable with modifying rpm spec files. I think Quinn sent the
 options that need to be changed. I'll dig it up when I get a chance,
 or perhaps you can check out the archive. It was literally in the last
 two days or so.

 I know that Jake has a few scripts to convert local users to vpopmail
 users, so maybe he'll chime in on that one.

 any help or suggestion is appreciated.
 Thanks.

 No Problem.

 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2]

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
+1

Yay! Greylisting!

Quinn




On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:20:20 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
 EE,
 
 What are the chances of including this patch in the basic simscan-toaster?
 
 While I'm inclined to believe that greylisting is best implemented at the
 firewall, what are the drawbacks to having it in the toaster?
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2
 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:10:55 +0100
 From: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi
 
 I've updates the greylisting patch to simscan 1.2
 It now uses log_message log initial blocking, and
 the first successfull attempt by a sender.
 
 greetings, Florian Pflug
 
 
 !DSPAM:4558c2c627411592547952!
 
 
 -- 
 -Eric 'shubes'
 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Manoj Katwal

Hi Quinn,

Thank you for your answer.  I am using qmail (6 year old) in ~/Maildir 
format.  I am replacing my current server with fressh Fedora 5 installation. 
I like qmailtoaster package since it has integrated all supported packages 
that I want except I donot have plan to host multiple domains-- and this is 
where I need to use the local users.  I am going to recompile 
vpopmail-toaster with system passwords = ON (enabled) and give it a try and 
see what happens.  Prior to your email, Erick pointed out to your earlier 
archive and I have read it.  I will let you and all know how it goes.


Once again, thank you for helping me out.

Best regards,
M. Katwal



- Original Message - 
From: Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster



Hi Manoj

Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users 
in /etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, 
vpopmail will then be able to find where to deliver mail by getting the 
user's home path from /etc/passwd and delivering mail to ~/Maildir instead 
of into the virtual users directories under /home/vpopmail/domains. I'm 
not 100% certain on this.


Also, if users don't have mail stored under ~/Maildir (in Maildir++ 
format) you will need to migrate mail to these user maildirs.


What kind of mail system are you migrating from? I recently did a complex 
migration from a 6-year-old sendmail server to qmail toaster so I know all 
the tricks. ;)


Quinn

-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:05:52 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09071.html

Install the vpopmail rpm and edit the spec file. Under configure
change --disable-passwd to --enable-passwd and rebuild the rpm.
Continue as per usual install.

Since this will modify the vpopmail libs, please ensure that you
recompile the courier packages as well. Or better yet, start from
scratch.

Erik

On 11/13/06, Manoj Katwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Erik,

Thanks again for the super prompt reply.  I am comfortable with
modifyingthe
rpm spec files.  I will follow your directions and try to find out the
archive that explains the trick.


Best regards,
M Katwal


- Original Message -
From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster



Hello Manoj


Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak

vpopmail so
that I can use existing local users without having to create new 
users?

OR
is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without
having
to change their password and still be able to manage all of my

users that

would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?


Tweaking vpopmail to use local users is fairly simple, if you are
comfortable with modifying rpm spec files. I think Quinn sent the
options that need to be changed. I'll dig it up when I get a chance,
or perhaps you can check out the archive. It was literally in the last
two days or so.

I know that Jake has a few scripts to convert local users to vpopmail
users, so maybe he'll chime in on that one.


any help or suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks.


No Problem.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Quinn,

There is a placeholder on the wiki for upgrading from sendmail. Would you
care to get the content started?

Quinn Comendant wrote:
 Hi Manoj 
 
 Changing these options will enable vpopmail to authenticate against users in 
 /etc/passwd. I haven't done this myself, but as I understand it, vpopmail 
 will then be able to find where to deliver mail by getting the user's home 
 path from /etc/passwd and delivering mail to ~/Maildir instead of into the 
 virtual users directories under /home/vpopmail/domains. I'm not 100% certain 
 on this.
 
 Also, if users don't have mail stored under ~/Maildir (in Maildir++ format) 
 you will need to migrate mail to these user maildirs. 
 
 What kind of mail system are you migrating from? I recently did a complex 
 migration from a 6-year-old sendmail server to qmail toaster so I know all 
 the tricks. ;)
 
 Quinn
 
 -
 Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
 http://www.strangecode.com/
 +1 530 624 4410
 
 
 
 On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:05:52 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09071.html

 Install the vpopmail rpm and edit the spec file. Under configure
 change --disable-passwd to --enable-passwd and rebuild the rpm.
 Continue as per usual install.

 Since this will modify the vpopmail libs, please ensure that you
 recompile the courier packages as well. Or better yet, start from
 scratch.

 Erik

 On 11/13/06, Manoj Katwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Erik,

 Thanks again for the super prompt reply.  I am comfortable with 
 modifyingthe
 rpm spec files.  I will follow your directions and try to find out the
 archive that explains the trick.


 Best regards,
 M Katwal


 - Original Message -
 From: Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:21 AM
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster


 Hello Manoj

 Thank you for your prompt reply.  Is there a way we can tweak 
 vpopmail so
 that I can use existing local users without having to create new users?
 OR
 is it possible to migrate all of my users to vpopmail users without
 having
 to change their password and still be able to manage all of my 
 users that
 would point the primary domain (by creating new thru vpopmail)?
 Tweaking vpopmail to use local users is fairly simple, if you are
 comfortable with modifying rpm spec files. I think Quinn sent the
 options that need to be changed. I'll dig it up when I get a chance,
 or perhaps you can check out the archive. It was literally in the last
 two days or so.

 I know that Jake has a few scripts to convert local users to vpopmail
 users, so maybe he'll chime in on that one.

 any help or suggestion is appreciated.
 Thanks.
 No Problem.



-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] [Fwd: Re: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2]

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
EE,

Please have a look at this patch too when you get a chance (not a high
priority methinks). I like this one better, as it is implemented nearer the
front of the process in qmail-smtp instead of in simscan. I still think a
firewall implementation would be best though.

Thanks for looking into these.


 Original Message 
Subject:Re: [simscan] [PATCH] Updated greylisting patch for simscan 1.2
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:55:26 +
From:   Gerard Earley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:   Whitecurve
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Eric Shubes wrote:
 Richard Archer wrote:
   
 At 8:10 PM +0100 13/11/06, Florian G. Pflug wrote:

 
 + * Algorithm: When a sender with a source ip for which no record yet exists
 + *connects, his delivery will fail with a temporary error.
 + *All following delivery attempts by that sender will fail with
 + *a temporary error too, until GREYLIST_MIN_DELAY seconds after
 + *his _first_ attempt.
   
 The problem with checking only the IP address is that spambots
 work through a list of addresses to spam. So if they try one
 address on your server they get a 451. 5 minutes later they
 try a different address on your server and they get added to
 the whitelist.

 The way I set greylisting up is that it checks the IP/From/To
 tuple for retries and once it detects a retry it whitelists
 that IP address.

 I still think greylisting should be patched into qmail-smtpd
 so the 451 can be sent after the RCPT command.
 

 I agree. Greylisting should be as far in front of the process as possible,
 ideally in the (external) firewall. I sure wish that greylisting was
 integrated into IPCop.

   
  ...Richard.





 

   
There is a qmail patch that implements the full ip/to/from triple in
qmail during the SMTP phase.
Its fairly simple to patch into qmail-smtpd though it does use mysql for
storage so some people object to it for that reason.


I implement it on every qmail box i admin and it reduces spam by a vast
amount.
About 99% of spam gets caught by it and I'm not exaggerating.

http://www.digitaleveryware.com/projects/greylisting/


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'
!DSPAM:4558fe2927418441612098!

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] question regarding vpopmail-toaster

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
Most certainly. I will do it when I have a free afternoon -- although those are 
getting rare these days.

I also have a collection of shell and perl scripts (some quite large) I used to 
automate my sendmail-qmail transfer, although any who uses them will most 
certainly need to read and fully understand them before trusting them with 
their data. I'm happy to contribute, but would like to clean them up slightly 
and provide a disclaimer. ;P

Quinn



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:13:32 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
 There is a placeholder on the wiki for upgrading from sendmail. Would you
 care to get the content started?

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
I'm not sure about your specific environment, but in my experience the things 
that helped me the most in blocking spam are:

- enable network tests
- enable the URIDNSBL plugin (init.pre)
- using sa-update with the spamassassin and SARE rule sets.

The SARE rules helped the most with stock quote spams.

I have most of the other plugins running, as well as having installed Pyzor and 
FuzzyOCR. I'm pretty happy so far! The one thing I would want is better spam 
processing performance. If a huge wash of spam hits the server, the server load 
goes up to 2 or 3 (shouldn't happen on a dual-core 3.2GHz receiving as little 
mail as we do).

Here is the output from the sa-stats program 
(http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt) from my server for 
the past 24 hours:


Email: 5034  Autolearn:   417  AvgScore:  12.18  AvgScanTime:  6.02 sec
Spam:  3518  Autolearn:   341  AvgScore:  18.24  AvgScanTime:  6.11 sec
Ham:   1516  Autolearn:76  AvgScore:  -1.89  AvgScanTime:  5.79 sec

Time Spent Running SA: 8.41 hours
Time Spent Processing Spam:5.97 hours
Time Spent Processing Ham: 2.44 hours

TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME   COUNT  %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM
--
   1HTML_MESSAGE 279669.47   79.48   46.24
   2URIBL_BLACK  157732.20   44.832.90
   3RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL153030.91   43.491.72
   4URIBL_JP_SURBL   138927.59   39.480.00
   5RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL138728.01   39.431.52
   6MY_CID_AND_STYLE 136227.10   38.720.13
   7SARE_GIF_ATTACH  133527.55   37.953.43
   8EXTRA_MPART_TYPE 122924.89   34.931.58
   9TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1   120123.86   34.140.00
  10PART_CID_STOCK   119723.78   34.030.00
  11MY_CID_ARIAL_STYLE   114122.67   32.430.00
  12MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2114122.69   32.430.07
  13URIBL_OB_SURBL   102720.44   29.190.13
  14MIME_HTML_ONLY   100422.77   28.549.37
  15SARE_GIF_STOX 96319.19   27.370.20
  16URIBL_SC_SURBL93718.63   26.630.07
  17HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_2882716.71   23.510.92
  18URIBL_WS_SURBL80616.29   22.910.92
  19URIBL_SBL 79315.85   22.540.33
  20PART_CID_STOCK_LESS   68113.53   19.360.00
--

TOP HAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME   COUNT  %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM
--
   1HTML_MESSAGE  70169.47   79.48   46.24
   2NO_REAL_NAME  66514.882.39   43.87
   3MIME_HTML_ONLY14222.77   28.549.37
   4BAYES_00  130 2.740.238.58
   5AWL   128 3.060.748.44
   6HTML_FONT_BIG 128 9.249.588.44
   7SPF_HELO_PASS  59 4.594.893.89
   8HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_0253 2.822.533.50
   9SARE_UNI   52 1.230.283.43
  10SARE_GIF_ATTACH5227.55   37.953.43
  11INFO_TLD   50 3.082.983.30
  12HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY   45 1.150.372.97
  13URIBL_BLACK4432.20   44.832.90
  14MISSING_HB_SEP 41 1.611.142.70
  15USER_IN_WHITELIST  35 0.700.002.31
  16UNPARSEABLE_RELAY  35 3.323.752.31
  17EMPTY_MESSAGE  32 1.130.712.11
  18FORGED_RCVD_HELO   27 3.954.891.78
  19RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL  2630.91   43.491.72
  20BAYES_50   26 0.870.511.72
--

Quinn




On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:24:55 -0600, Ryan Gibbons wrote:
 My server (not just my domain) is getting hit hard with spam related to
 stock quotes.  It is plan text, no links no html, and of course the
 envlope changes each time.  I have go through with sa-learn and try to
 mark them individually but they are still getting through, some are even
 being learned as ham b/c they are 

[qmailtoaster] qmail-smtp on Fdr6064

2006-11-13 Thread Wojciech Gabor
I try install qmail-toaster on Fedora Core 6 but it's any problem with 
qmail-smtp.

Local messages send by command mail are OK. 
Problem is with remote:
code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
/code

The same effect with connect to inet address.

In smtp log file:
code
@4000455904a80edc4494 tcpserver: status: 1/100
@4000455904a80edc5434 tcpserver: pid 11027 from 127.0.0.1
@4000455904a80edc5c04 tcpserver: ok 11027 
listowy.lo.pl:127.0.0.1:25 :127.0.0.1::48863
@4000455904a81abc7d74 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: error while loading 
shared libraries: libkrb5.so.3: failed to map segment from shared object: 
Cannot allocate memory
@4000455904a81abf05e4 tcpserver: end 11027 status 32512
@4000455904a81abf119c tcpserver: status: 0/100
/code

I ask Google but no any info about problem libkrb5.so.3 in FC6.
How solve it?
  
-- 
Wojciech Gabor
System uptime: 41 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours 45 minuts

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers




Ryan Gibbons wrote:

  
  My server (not just my domain) is getting hit hard
with
spam related to stock quotes. It is plan text, no links no html, and
of course the envlope changes each time. I have go through with
sa-learn and try to mark them individually but they are still getting
through, some are even being learned as ham b/c they are generated a
score of over -3, (*note to self, I might want to bump that up) and
very few are being marked anything lower then 3. On overage, it is
coming across as zero.
  
Thunderbird sees it has spam, so it is possible to catch these, I just
don't know enough about spamassassin to create a rule set to catch it.
I use rules de jour and moderate RBL block list.
  
Anybody have any hits, If you want to see the message, let me know and
I can put it up here.
  

Look on the rulesemporium website for the stock list, which plugs into
Rules du Jour. That should catch them for you.




RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
Maybe doing in drugs is worth trying, maybe it imporove the carefullness. ;P

Q


On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:15:16 +0100, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
 Certainy, out alert system, I thinks
 
 BTW i'm not in drugs, just typed uncarefully :-D

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtp on Fdr6064

2006-11-13 Thread Erik Espinoza

Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install all
of the dependencies from fdr6064-deps.sh?

On 11/13/06, Wojciech Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I try install qmail-toaster on Fedora Core 6 but it's any problem with
qmail-smtp.

Local messages send by command mail are OK.
Problem is with remote:
code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet 127.0.0.1 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
/code

The same effect with connect to inet address.

In smtp log file:
code
@4000455904a80edc4494 tcpserver: status: 1/100
@4000455904a80edc5434 tcpserver: pid 11027 from 127.0.0.1
@4000455904a80edc5c04 tcpserver: ok 11027
listowy.lo.pl:127.0.0.1:25 :127.0.0.1::48863
@4000455904a81abc7d74 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: error while loading
shared libraries: libkrb5.so.3: failed to map segment from shared object:
Cannot allocate memory
@4000455904a81abf05e4 tcpserver: end 11027 status 32512
@4000455904a81abf119c tcpserver: status: 0/100
/code

I ask Google but no any info about problem libkrb5.so.3 in FC6.
How solve it?

--
Wojciech Gabor
System uptime: 41 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours 45 minuts

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers

Quinn Comendant wrote:


Email: 5034  Autolearn:   417  AvgScore:  12.18  AvgScanTime:  6.02 sec
Spam:  3518  Autolearn:   341  AvgScore:  18.24  AvgScanTime:  6.11 sec
Ham:   1516  Autolearn:76  AvgScore:  -1.89  AvgScanTime:  5.79 sec

Time Spent Running SA: 8.41 hours
Time Spent Processing Spam:5.97 hours
Time Spent Processing Ham: 2.44 hours

TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME   COUNT  %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM
--

   1HTML_MESSAGE 279669.47   79.48   46.24
   2URIBL_BLACK  157732.20   44.832.90
   3RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL153030.91   43.491.72
   4URIBL_JP_SURBL   138927.59   39.480.00
   5RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL138728.01   39.431.52
   6MY_CID_AND_STYLE 136227.10   38.720.13
   7SARE_GIF_ATTACH  133527.55   37.953.43
   8EXTRA_MPART_TYPE 122924.89   34.931.58
   9TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1   120123.86   34.140.00
  10PART_CID_STOCK   119723.78   34.030.00
  
Not to be off-topic Quinn, but did you install SA from source? I thought 
the sa-stats.pl script couldn't be used since Qmail doesn't use syslog 
time.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtp on Fdr6064

2006-11-13 Thread Wojciech Gabor
Dnia wtorek, 14 listopada 2006 01:10, Erik Espinoza napisał:
 Did you compile the qmail-toaster on this machine? Did you install all
 of the dependencies from fdr6064-deps.sh?

Yes, all build process on this machine by fdr6064-install-script. Only 
vpopmail build without --disable-many-domains.

-- 
Wojciech Gabor
System uptime: 41 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours 15 minuts

Zwiększ przestrzeń swojego dysku twardego - usuń Windows!

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Philip Nix Guru

Jake Vickers wrote:

Quinn Comendant wrote:


Email: 5034  Autolearn:   417  AvgScore:  12.18  AvgScanTime:  
6.02 sec
Spam:  3518  Autolearn:   341  AvgScore:  18.24  AvgScanTime:  
6.11 sec
Ham:   1516  Autolearn:76  AvgScore:  -1.89  AvgScanTime:  
5.79 sec


Time Spent Running SA: 8.41 hours
Time Spent Processing Spam:5.97 hours
Time Spent Processing Ham: 2.44 hours

TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
--
RANKRULE NAME   COUNT  %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  
%OFHAM
--

   1HTML_MESSAGE 279669.47   79.48   46.24
   2URIBL_BLACK  157732.20   44.832.90
   3RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL153030.91   43.491.72
   4URIBL_JP_SURBL   138927.59   39.480.00
   5RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL138728.01   39.431.52
   6MY_CID_AND_STYLE 136227.10   38.720.13
   7SARE_GIF_ATTACH  133527.55   37.953.43
   8EXTRA_MPART_TYPE 122924.89   34.931.58
   9TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1   120123.86   34.140.00
  10PART_CID_STOCK   119723.78   34.030.00
  
Not to be off-topic Quinn, but did you install SA from source? I 
thought the sa-stats.pl script couldn't be used since Qmail doesn't 
use syslog time.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I wouldnt use pyzor .. well if you dont have a busy server you could but 
if you suddenly have a spam mass maling that could explain a bit of your 
load


I am getting this on model name  : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz
Email:   117563  Autolearn: 27505  AvgScore:   8.43  AvgScanTime:  1.90 sec
Spam: 70393  Autolearn: 15034  AvgScore:  14.18  AvgScanTime:  1.84 sec
Ham:  47170  Autolearn: 12471  AvgScore:  -0.16  AvgScanTime:  1.99 sec

Time Spent Running SA:62.05 hours
Time Spent Processing Spam:   36.04 hours
Time Spent Processing Ham:26.01 hours

.. you can run stats this way jake
perl sa-stats-1.0.pl -l /var/log/qmail/spamd/ -f @400* or -f current 
 whatever you prefer


Cheers
-P


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
No, it is spamassassin-toaster. I just modified these two lines in sa-stats:

if (!defined $LOG_DIR) { $LOG_DIR=/var/log/qmail/spamd }
if (!defined $FILE) { $FILE='^current$' }  # regex

It seems to work though.

Quinn


On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:12:02 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
 Not to be off-topic Quinn, but did you install SA from source? I 
 thought the sa-stats.pl script couldn't be used since Qmail doesn't 
 use syslog time.

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Quinn Comendant
Good to know. I haven't explored to much, but I'll start by setting use_pyzor 0 
and seeing if the scan time speeds up. My AvgScanTime is roughly 3x as much as 
yours. What is your SA configuration? Plugins? local.cf? Why so fast?

Q


On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:21:13 +0100, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
 Email:   117563  Autolearn: 27505  AvgScore:   8.43  AvgScanTime:  1.90 sec
 Spam: 70393  Autolearn: 15034  AvgScore:  14.18  AvgScanTime:  1.84 sec
 Ham:  47170  Autolearn: 12471  AvgScore:  -0.16  AvgScanTime:  1.99 sec

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Cool. I've added it with these changes to the next qmailtoaster-plus release.

If anyone's itching for it right away, I can cut a release. Otherwise, I'll
wait for a few more changes before cutting v0.2.1.

Quinn Comendant wrote:
 No, it is spamassassin-toaster. I just modified these two lines in sa-stats:
 
 if (!defined $LOG_DIR) { $LOG_DIR=/var/log/qmail/spamd }
 if (!defined $FILE) { $FILE='^current$' }  # regex
 
 It seems to work though.
 
 Quinn
 
 
 On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:12:02 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
 Not to be off-topic Quinn, but did you install SA from source? I 
 thought the sa-stats.pl script couldn't be used since Qmail doesn't 
 use syslog time.
 

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Philip Nix Guru

Same plugins with the official init.pre and its 3 plugs enabled
v310.pre standard v312.pre standard
1 extra plugin imageinfo (http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm)
no pyzor , no dcc but razor2
a bunch of rules from rules emporium
TRUSTED_RULESETS=SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 TRIPWIRE SARE_RANDOM ANTIDRUG 
SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_FRAUD 
SARE_ADULT SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_HEADER SARE_HTML SARE_STOCKS SARE_OEM


and a few extra custom rules (mainly to avoid special words to be 
considered as spam for some of our customers)

That's about it

The scan time is usually lower, that's biased coz I had a little issue 
for 30minutes with the bayes db

my average is  around
AvgScanTime:  1.59 sec
AvgScanTime:  1.59 sec
AvgScanTime:  1.58 sec

-P

Quinn Comendant wrote:

Good to know. I haven't explored to much, but I'll start by setting use_pyzor 0 
and seeing if the scan time speeds up. My AvgScanTime is roughly 3x as much as 
yours. What is your SA configuration? Plugins? local.cf? Why so fast?

Q


On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:21:13 +0100, Philip Nix Guru wrote:
  

Email:   117563  Autolearn: 27505  AvgScore:   8.43  AvgScanTime:  1.90 sec
Spam: 70393  Autolearn: 15034  AvgScore:  14.18  AvgScanTime:  1.84 sec
Ham:  47170  Autolearn: 12471  AvgScore:  -0.16  AvgScanTime:  1.99 sec



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Suexec apache2 qmailadmin

2006-11-13 Thread Jeremy Runner
Now that I have qmailtoaster running and doing so well, I'm trying to  
get qmailadmin working.  I have apache2 configured with suexec.  All cgi 
scripts have to be in /var/www and a virtual host has to be configured 
to set SuexecUserGroup to run cgi scripts.  How can I get qmailadmin 
working in this environment so that it will be available for all virtual 
domains I have and not just one.  Hope I'm not too confusing.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Suexec apache2 qmailadmin

2006-11-13 Thread Jeremy Runner




That didn't work. I think you have to set SuexecUserGroup to which
user you want to have access but this is set in the VirtualHost
directive.

I found this link but I'm not sure if it applies.
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/trustix_notes.eml.html




Quinn Comendant wrote:

  Do you know if it is possible to disable suexec for one specific site? In my opinion it is safe to run qmailadmin under user apache/www/nobody.

Otherwise, it should work to copy the /usr/share/qmailadmin directory to /var/www/qmailadmin and adjust the paths in /etc/httpd/conf/toaster.conf accordingly. I don't think suexec will let you run it through a symlink.

Quinn

-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:05:48 -0600, Jeremy Runner wrote:
  
  
Now that I have qmailtoaster running and doing so well, I'm trying 
to  get qmailadmin working.  I have apache2 configured with suexec.  
All cgi scripts have to be in /var/www and a virtual host has to be 
configured to set SuexecUserGroup to run cgi scripts.  How can I get 
qmailadmin working in this environment so that it will be available 
for all virtual domains I have and not just one.  Hope I'm not too 
confusing.

  
  
-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




  





Re: [qmailtoaster] Suexec apache2 qmailadmin

2006-11-13 Thread Nolan Garrett




I don't know if this helps or not, but in my case I was required to
rename qmailadmin to index.cgi, and change it's ownership to vpopmail
and vchkpw. This user and group was given a UID and GID  500.
Also, I had to recompile suexec using the directions from the link
below so that I could execute out of /usr/share/qmailadmin.

http://weblog.massivegeek.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=67

Nolan

Jeremy Runner wrote:

  
That didn't work. I think you have to set SuexecUserGroup to which
user you want to have access but this is set in the VirtualHost
directive.
  
I found this link but I'm not sure if it applies.
  http://www.shupp.org/toaster/trustix_notes.eml.html
  
  
  
  
Quinn Comendant wrote:
  
Do you know if it is possible to disable suexec for one specific site? In my opinion it is safe to run qmailadmin under user apache/www/nobody.

Otherwise, it should work to copy the /usr/share/qmailadmin directory to /var/www/qmailadmin and adjust the paths in /etc/httpd/conf/toaster.conf accordingly. I don't think suexec will let you run it through a symlink.

Quinn

-
Strangecode :: Internet Consultancy
http://www.strangecode.com/
+1 530 624 4410



On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:05:48 -0600, Jeremy Runner wrote:
  

  Now that I have qmailtoaster running and doing so well, I'm trying 
to  get qmailadmin working.  I have apache2 configured with suexec.  
All cgi scripts have to be in /var/www and a virtual host has to be 
configured to set SuexecUserGroup to run cgi scripts.  How can I get 
qmailadmin working in this environment so that it will be available 
for all virtual domains I have and not just one.  Hope I'm not too 
confusing.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




  
  




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!

2006-11-13 Thread George Sweetnam
It seems likely that something isn't installing completely with your 
toaster.  For spam and clam scanning to be enabled (and show in the headers) 
they must be installed, functional, and detected by simscan at the point 
it's updated.  Run this from the command line and see if it shows in your 
headers:

/var/qmail/bin/simscanmk
/var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g

If you don't see it in the headers (or a test script) then it's likely 
spamassassin isn't functioning correctly ( tail -10 
/var/log/qmail/spamd/current )

George S.


- Original Message - 
From: Hainarosie Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin - please help!!!


Hi can anyone give me some advise in the matter written below.
I did 3 or 4 fresh install of the qmailtoaster package and I do not kinow
where to go.
I can not figure out what is wrong.

Please help me.
Razvan




 Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
 I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
 qmailtoaster package.
 The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:

 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
  by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12
 Nov
 2006 11:42:22 -
 Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not
 designate permitted sender hosts)
 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s
  scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186
 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100)
  by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 -
 From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: test
 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660
 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA==

 Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav:
 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line
 Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it.
 PLease help me,
 Thanks,
 Razvan

 What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain?

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'

 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 my simcontrol file is:

 :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 and my tcp.smtp file look like this
 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan



 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamd and SquirrelMail

2006-11-13 Thread Nozy
Hi Eric

On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:10 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
  I can't help you with the Squirrelmail filters since I've never used them.
 
 Me too.
 

Thats Cool may go see the Squrrel Mail List 
(it ment to fork but I don't think it does )


  What do you mean by updated to the new ones out?  The newest
  spamassassin-toaster, or did you download the newest source code and
  compile it yourself? Do you mean you added additional rules form
  somewhere, and if so, which ones? Thanks.
  
 
 Also, is your SA log showing any errors?
 

SA log ?? sorry man not sure what log that is 



 Has your SA bayes db journal ever sync'd?
 # sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint
 
 Has auto-expire ever completed?
 # sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire

Be For 
00:00:02  runq-sz  plist-sz   ldavg-1   ldavg-5  ldavg-15
00:10:022   165  3.48  4.07  3.59
00:20:023   157  3.49  3.41  3.43
00:30:020   155  3.46  3.23  3.27
00:40:032   158  3.40  3.21  3.15

after 
11:50:011   167  0.37  0.74  0.71
12:00:012   159  0.31  0.44  0.58
12:10:013   163  0.53  0.41  0.49
12:20:012   159  0.27  0.38  0.43


This did help itbut still hitting hard on ram 1GB system with qmail and 
Bind 

output 
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint
[9064] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file
R/O /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_tok
s
[9064] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file
R/O /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_see
n
[9064] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[9064] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1163459710
[9064] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1163459710
[9064] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 1092, nham = 66492
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for *F = U*ignore
D*compiling.spamassassin.taint.org D*spamassassin.taint.org D*taint.org
D*org
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for *m =  1163460816 lint_rules 
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for X-Spam-Relays-External =  
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for X-Spam-Relays-Internal =  
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for *RT =  
[9064] dbg: bayes: header tokens for *RU =  
[9064] dbg: bayes: token 'body' = 4.86393635295181e-05
[9064] dbg: bayes: token 'somewhat' = 0.000756680731364276
[9064] dbg: bayes: token 'message' = 0.0129990606036694
[9064] dbg: bayes: score = 0.390799343575021
[9064] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1163459710
[9064] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
[9064] dbg: bayes: untie-ing db_toks
[9064] dbg: bayes: untie-ing db_seen
[9064] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'RAZOR2_CHECK'
[9064] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
# sa-learn -u vpopmail --force-expire





 
-- 
Nozy [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

2006-11-13 Thread Shelly
Im thinking of using the QmailToaster Plus to upgrade my old (read 18 months) Toaster install - Im not sure if its been covered, but this will continue to run the current qmail setup, build the new version in the background and then copy over and restart to run the new version of the toaster with all the settings from the previous version? Is there anything I need to manually back up? And also - will this copy all existing email in a users directory? Thanks"Eric \"Shubes\"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I totally agree, David. That's why I wrote the qtp-newmodel scripts to dojust that!They do everything except the update ahead of time in the sandbox, so theproduction server is not affected. Then at the appropriate moment, thesysadmin can re-run the script, automatically skipping over everythingthat's already
 been done, and apply the update (which is done with a singlerpm -Uvh command btw).You might want to give it a try! ;)David Sánchez Martín wrote:   Certainy it should work great, but i don't like unassisted updates.   I don't want being woke up at 3 o'clock because out alert system a trivial problem stopped the corporative mail system.   I thinks is good idea to retrieve source rpms, build the binary rpm's nightly, and wait for the sysadmin to tell to install in an apropriate moment (if everything runs ok, it will take less than 2 minutes, anyway).  Just my opinion  *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*  | David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es  
 E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |  | E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77   Mediadores de Seguros  |  | Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C| 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |  | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*    De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script   I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a charm.  Ryan Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server.  I would   to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous. Thanks. -QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted  - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   I just did it last night no problems.Actually with the new qtp-newmodel upgrade is about as safe as any upgrade can be.  It creates a sandbox and compiles everything in it so that your mail servers stay up until everything is compile, then it just
 copies over the files and restarts the services.   Francisco "Paco" Peralta -- -Eric 'shubes'- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

[qmailtoaster] Spam tools - ASSP

2006-11-13 Thread Shelly
Hi - Ive been closely following the DSPAM thread with great interest.Recently I have come across another tool called ASSP. Has anyone used this before? What were the results? Also, Id be interested in hearing opinions on the quality of the different spam tools - spamassassin, DSPAM, ASSP, anything else out there that may be great, that others should check out? Thanks Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with spam

2006-11-13 Thread Ole N.Johansen
Hello,

I got the same problem whateverthis spam is.
It has been sent as plain text message only.

Thanks for any ideas,

B/R Ole J

Copy of content:
---
Symbol: MXXR
Current price:   Around   $0.018
Short Term Target:$0.10
Long Term Target: $0.45


Results from MXXR's latest drilling will be announced very
soon.  Excitement is building, and the inside word is that
the results will exceed expectations!


In order to benefit from this lucrative opportunity you need
to get in now, before the big news release.  There's still
time, but not much.  The news could be out as early as
Tuesday, November 13th.

THIS is the one you've been waiting for!  Do yourself a
favor and make that big score!

-

On Tue, November 14, 2006 00:56, Jake Vickers wrote:
 Ryan Gibbons wrote:
 My server (not just my domain) is getting hit hard with spam related
 to stock quotes.  It is plan text, no links no html, and of course the
 envlope changes each time.  I have go through with sa-learn and try to
 mark them individually but they are still getting through, some are
 even being learned as ham b/c they are generated a score of over -3,
 (*note to self, I might want to bump that up) and very few are being
 marked anything lower then 3.  On overage, it is coming across as zero.

 Thunderbird sees it has spam, so it is possible to catch these, I just
 don't know enough about spamassassin to create a rule set to catch
 it.  I use rules de jour and moderate RBL block list.

 Anybody have any hits, If you want to see the message, let me know and
 I can put it up here.
 Look on the rulesemporium website for the stock list, which plugs into
 Rules du Jour. That should catch them for you.





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]