hi guys,
may be this is not QMT issue but i need to handle my bounce emails. Can
somebody suggest me any bounce email handler.
--
Erol KAHRAMAN
System Network Administrator
Harry Zink wrote:
In one or two sentences, what are the major benefits of Centos 5?
Based on my experience of the last upgrade, which went seamlessly via
yum, I'm kinda looking forward to what new things Centos will offer.
For what you're using it for (email server, maybe some webpages), there
Erol KAHRAMAN wrote:
hi guys,
may be this is not QMT issue but i need to handle my bounce emails.
Can somebody suggest me any bounce email handler.
If you're trying to read them, then use either the webmail client or I'd
set up another email program (like Thunderbird) just for that.
Not
i am trying to send an info mail to my client. But there are a lot of bounce
email. I need to analyze and report the reasons for bounce emails.
Therefore, email clients is not what i am aimed.
On 4/11/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erol KAHRAMAN wrote:
hi guys,
may be this is not
Sounds like you should build a mailing list with ezmlm and let it
handle the bounces. Either that, or set in your email client 'Bounce-
To' as an address where you can collect the bounce messages for
analysis and reporting.
On Apr 11, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Erol KAHRAMAN wrote:
i am trying to
if i make a change to my
var/qmail/control/blacklists
basically adding -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
so that it reads
-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
do i need to do a
# qmailctl stop
# qmailctl start
or a
svc -d
Wow, I just launched my new ISP and my first customer tries to send an
email to all his friends and many of the messages are returned.
I can certainly search for each error number on Google and what-not, but
can anyone give me a brief explanation of what the heck is going on
here? I realize
How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max
recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You
can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy
spamming.
Justice London
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:44 -0500, Michael H wrote:
Wow, I just
Michael H wrote:
Wow, I just launched my new ISP and my first customer tries to send an
email to all his friends and many of the messages are returned.
I can certainly search for each error number on Google and what-not,
but can anyone give me a brief explanation of what the heck is going
on
Justice London wrote:
How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max
recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You
can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy
spamming.
yeah, my server is built for anti-spam, not so much for
Yep.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote:
Justice London wrote:
How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max
recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You
can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy
Jake Vickers wrote:
He put way too many users in the To: or CC: fields. You control this in
your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file. You'll see a field that says
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=25 and that will define how many people can be in
the To or CC fields.
Okay... easy enough. I'll change those to
Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really had any great
issue.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:02 -0700, Justice London wrote:
Yep.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote:
Justice London wrote:
How many people did he try to send to? By default
Justice London wrote:
Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really had any great
issue.
you mean the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT? Sorry, I could be misled.
I changed my tcp.smtp file and service qmail stop and service qmail start.
That okay?
You actually don't need to restart qmail to affect changes to cdb files.
You can simply run 'qmailctl cdb' and it will update the necessary cdb
files.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:08 -0500, Michael H wrote:
Justice London wrote:
Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really
Putting yahoogroups in local.cf seems to have increased the spam score
by 0.9:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
server.northvalleycomputing.com
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
George Toft wrote:
Putting yahoogroups in local.cf seems to have increased the spam score
by 0.9:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
server.northvalleycomputing.com
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
Adding more noise and not enough info . . .
I noticed this also one day when I was using squirrelmail - a bunch of
spam showed up (10-15 messages), I read one, clicked on the inbox link,
and they we all gone. I did not delete even one - they just went away.
What process would possibly
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
if i make a change to my
var/qmail/control/blacklists
basically adding -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
so that it reads
-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
do i need to do a
# qmailctl stop
#
Hi Jake,
Here are the headers . . .
From - Wed Apr 11 00:56:31 2007
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 1176274162.6630.server.northvalleycomputing.com,S=18178
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Return-Path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6628
George Toft wrote:
Hi Jake,
Here are the headers . . .
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
That score is rather low in my opinion. The default required is 5.
Almost all of the scores in SA are geared to get it above the 5 score,
so almost all of them will
Nothing should delete mail after delivery other than a client.
Sounds like you may have something else running on your machine that
is causing problems.
Erik
On 4/11/07, George Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding more noise and not enough info . . .
I noticed this also one day when I was
Looking at the type of mail that I receive, 2.2-2.8 provides a good
balance of minimizing spam, and getting [virtually] no false positives.
Perhaps I'm trying to tune SA with the wrong tool (adjusting the score)?
When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Maybe
I need a
George Toft wrote:
Adding more noise and not enough info . . .
I noticed this also one day when I was using squirrelmail - a bunch of
spam showed up (10-15 messages), I read one, clicked on the inbox
link, and they we all gone. I did not delete even one - they just
went away.
What process
CentOS 4.4 install with QMT. Nothing else. No users, except me. A few
cron jobs, but nothing that makes changes (just monitoring stuff).
Weird.
The squirrelmail isn't compiled with some kind of smap filter is it?
George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
623-203-1760
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Nothing
Hey everyone,
Sometime yesterday my mail server suddenly stopped accepting e-mail. It
was erroring everything out with messages similar to the following:
(from smtp/current)
@4000461dacfb03d7352c CHKUSER accepted sender: from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote
26 matches
Mail list logo
