Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-14 Thread Timon Reinhard
Hi! Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. [...] I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a

RE: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-14 Thread Jean-Paul van de Plasse
Hi All, Am so far overwhelmed by all the responses! Guess it would be interesting to separate things.. Normally I am not a great fan of a js interface like extjs, but they have made a very nice library. And it does help to get a fairly quick interface going, since all the basic components needed

Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2008-02-14 Thread Jake Vickers
David Campbell wrote: Hi guys, I know you are all getting to love me, but I have a funny issue and I would like to see what you think I have a cleint that recieves emails daily from their accoutn manager at their bank, which they cannot recieve the isntant we switched over the qmailtoaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] autorespond-2.0.4 bugs

2008-02-14 Thread Mike Hamrick
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:09 AM, Timon Reinhard wrote: Mike Hamrick wrote: I've cleaned up some of the syslog logging in my version, and have also packaged up a source RPM for it if anyone is interested. http://www.muppetlabs.com/~mikeh/autorespond- toaster-2.0.4-1.3.5.src.rpm Hmm, it

Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-14 Thread PakOgah
yap that why I suggesting deepofix's control panel I think they provide source code also on sourceforge so JP can play around with it plus with extjs it would be excelent control panel and for qmailtoaster architecture (what software to use for IMAP, how to use RBLs, etc) , I gave them to you

[qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Dan Herbon
Hello, My company wants to establish Encrypted email for sensitive emails. I found a company in which several banks use that offer Email Encryption. I spoke with their tech guys and they said basically I relay all email that leaves the server through their servers via TLS Encryption. Has

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Ben Mills
TLS is SSL. By default your toaster should attempt attempt an encrypted connection every time it connects to a foreign host. To go further, you may wish to use SSL between your server and its clients. POP3 SSL (port 995) is ready to go with the default build of toaster. But you need to build a

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Ben Mills
I should have said essentially the same. I was trying to keep it simple, not to misinform. At the time TLS was being standardized, there were issues with RSA being under patent, DES which was never considered secure, and 512 key lengths which really shouldn't be used nowadays. OTOH the

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Eric Shubes
Ben Mills wrote: I don't know about the port thing. SSL on port 25 works fine. I wasn't aware of that. I wonder why there's a separate standard port for SSL on various services (https, nntps, ldaps, imaps, pop3s, telnets). -- -Eric 'shubes'

[qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread Jim Shupert, Jr.
Friends I have qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.10-1.3.12 running on a centOS 4.4 machine I have 2 users i wish to get rid of, I should mention that I do not restrict to a quota so one of them has 600 MB and the other 140 Mb associated with them. What is the best way to get rid of a user? Can I use

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Warren Melnick
It depends on whether the port wants ssl as it is contacted or if it takes a normal connection and a STARTTLS command that then flips it into secure mode. W On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Mills wrote: I don't know about the port thing. SSL on

RE: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread Helmut Fritz
I also do not use or want a catchall. Allows too much spam in... -Original Message- From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs Jim: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at

Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread Natalio Gatti
Jim: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so My q is is there a BEST way to delete ?- is one way better than the other? Both ways are equally effective. also - I do not have quotas on my users - are there any long term problems with that? The only

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Eric Shubes
That was my impression. So a port is either configured for SSL or not? (not considering TLS, which would go on a non-SSL port configured with TLS capability) Warren Melnick wrote: It depends on whether the port wants ssl as it is contacted or if it takes a normal connection and a STARTTLS

Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)

2008-02-14 Thread David Campbell
every single mail that comes from @anz.com gets rejected. I am alos having a TLS issue with this server sending to 1 other Exchange server that I know of.. the two issues could be related, its in another thread of this mailing list. On 14/02/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS Secure

2008-02-14 Thread Ben Mills
Check your qmail box by telnetting port 25. After the greeting, type starttls and hit enter. If it's TLS ready, it should respond with a '220 ready for tls'. Dan Herbon wrote: Hello, My company wants to establish Encrypted email for sensitive emails. I found a company in which several

Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread Jim Shupert, Jr.
Thanks for that Helmut.. so having a catch all leaves one suseptable to more spam... that is interesting. [ i wonder why ] thanks ALL and have a great day! j - Original Message - From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February

Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread David Campbell
It leaves you open to more spam because emails addressed to invalid addresses are not rejected as there are no longer any invalid addresses, it sends any spam, even incorrectly addresses spam, to your mailbox, this leaves you open to receiving emails directed at accounts that the spam server is

Re: [qmailtoaster] No one can send me messages

2008-02-14 Thread dan
i have alomost the samme problem, i can send/receive email in the domain, but if i try from yahoo, or another external mail service, i do not receive the messages or the delivery error u have a clue about this? regards dan On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Warren Melnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

2008-02-14 Thread Joseph Lundgren
I agree with Jim's assessment. IMO, we as email administrators should do all that we can to prevent the aggravation of our customers, and prevent the waste of our bandwidth. Done properly, rejecting (bouncing), rather than deleting invalid email can help achieve both goals. At my company,

[qmailtoaster] error update clamav

2008-02-14 Thread emiliano
Friends, why this happening this error, helps [ Space_p0:root ] freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb 14 23:08:24 2008 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.92 Recommended version: 0.92.1 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq main.inc

[qmailtoaster] UPDATED ClamAV Package

2008-02-14 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Grab it from www.qmailtoaster.org EE - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional