The SpamAssassin install installs version 3.2.5
These comments apply to Clam as well, Clam is more complex, but it makes
the version updating a lot easier.
If the Install was per Bill Schupp's notes:
http://billslinuxqmail.sourceforge.net/toaster/
Then SpamAssassin version would be 3.3.2
I've
On 04/29/2011 03:47 PM, David Bray wrote:
The SpamAssassin install installs version 3.2.5
These comments apply to Clam as well, Clam is more complex, but it makes
the version updating a lot easier.
If the Install was per Bill Schupp's notes:
http://billslinuxqmail.sourceforge.net/toaster/
I've just used the QMT Recipe - and the good thing is the RPM based
Install, quite modular etc ..
but the version of SpamAssassin winds up at 3.2.5, SpamAssassin at
SpamAssassin is 3.3.1, Yum on Fedora 13 installs 3.3.2
I'm just trying to understand the reasoning behind sticking with a 3.2
based
SpamAssassin 3.2.5 is current for CentOS 5.x.
When CentOS 6.x is available (probably in a month or so), I expect that
Jake will make a spamassassin-toaster 3.3.1 (which is current for
RHEL6.0) package available.
While there is probably not a major problem running SA3.3 with QMT
presently,
Thanks for the Feedback
Understand about the Fedora Lifetime etc. I use VM's and Fedora 13 is
the current Fedora. Tried Ubuntu, CentOS and keep coming back to Fedora
- mainly because the php is more up to date
The driving line is not so much SA - SpamAssassin as Clam, on my last
server - Fedora
Am 30.04.2011 um 05:40 schrieb David Bray:
Thanks for the Feedback
Understand about the Fedora Lifetime etc. I use VM's and Fedora 13 is the
current Fedora. Tried Ubuntu, CentOS and keep coming back to Fedora - mainly
because the php is more up to date
The driving line is not so much
