On 03/05/2008 12:34 PM, Richard Starkie wrote:
I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by
my SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a
little light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be
looking, and if the messages
On 03/05/2008 01:01 PM, Ayesha wrote:
Hi Qmailtoaster-list,
Does anybody uses TMDA that could help me in configurations matters?
With qmail, sure :-)
--
Best regards,
Ayesha mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I have setup and used TMDA with QMT quite
On 2/20/2008 4:29 PM, lordfuknowsyou wrote:
Hello list.
I am sorry that this topic has been covered before, I know, but I am
stuck.. Please bear with me.
Incoming mail works fine. I have a proper MX record.
# dig mx miekungfu.com | grep MX
;miekungfu.com. IN MX
On 02/13/2008 11:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't so much related to qmailtoaster as it is qmail itself and if
this is better suited for a different list please let me know and I'll be
happy to ask else where.
The company I work at has a regular qmail install (not a toaster) with
I have gotten ucspi-ssl working on port 465 for SSL enabled SMTP
authentication, and auth is required on that port. What I want to do
now is block authentication completely on port 25, so that users are
forced to use SSL to auth. I can't find the correct variables for the
SMTP run file to do
On 11/21/2007 6:23 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
Is it so, that the default SMTP auth is not SLL enabled?
If so, could you document for rest of us, how you got SSL enabled?
Cheers,
Peter
The default SMTP run file provides TLS on port 25. I wanted TLS+SSL to
run on port 465 to provide a
On 11/21/2007 6:36 AM, Igor Smitran wrote:
Isn't port 25 needed for incoming mails? If you block port 25 how will
some other sender out of your domain be able to send you an email?
For example, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] wants to send you an email then he
will come to your port 25 and deliver the
On 11/21/2007 07:40 AM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi Adam,
This seems to work :
Change the /bin/true to /bin/false in your /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
JP
What I am trying to do is block unencrypted authentication requests from
users trying to send outbound mail. I want to force them
On 11/21/2007 09:31 AM, Davide Bozzelli wrote:
Adam Cantwell ha scritto:
Setting AUTH=0 on my qmailrocks machine causes smtpd to no longer
advertise auth at all, and MUA's detect this and drop the connection
with an error before any credentials are sent. This is the setup I am
trying
On 11/21/2007 09:22 AM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi Adam,
You are right about the advertising...
Did see that also.. but it does make login in go wrong so to say :)
Anyways there is no option now to stop this advertising from happening,
I did not think this would be needed when I
Todd W wrote:
From: Todd W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using 'v=spf1 mx -all' for my spf record. Is this a good, generic
setting that we can suggest on the wiki? (i.e. accept mail from all
domains listed in the given domain's MX section)
So does the list agree that this is a sane generic DNS
On 11/16/2007 02:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts folks?
---
I think this happened while trying some things in another thread about trying
to get DK working.
Here's the problem now;
authlib: up (pid 2323) 4230 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2321) 4230 seconds
imap4: up (pid 796) 0
Warren Melnick wrote:
Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain?
W
On Nov 12, 2007 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whom ever helps you will ultimately help me as well. Not only do I
Kyle Quillen wrote:
So am I Right in saying that my dns record should look like this for the
spf2.0
IN TXT spf2.0/pra
Thanks
Q
Yes, that syntax is correct. Like I said, that alone solved all of my
issues with Hotmail/MSN.
As for Yahoo, they don't check SPF. They are the
Kyle Quillen wrote:
If I remember correctly Domain Keys was broken in the Toaster and thus was
disabled.
How did you work around that or is it now working correctly?
Thanks
Q
I wasn't aware DK was broken in the toaster? I admin several QMT boxes,
but none of them actually use DK to
On Tue, September 18, 2007 8:45 am, Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Is there something with qmailadmin, or anything else anyone can think
of or point me to, that determines an absolute maximum for allowable
quota for a user's account?
When I attempt to raise a quota on my system above 2gb (2048mb),
L. A. wrote:
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on
devel site under heavy load?
I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav
0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all
viruses that
Running it on several machines here. Some upgraded, some fresh
installs. I have not had any problems.
Adam
Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote:
At one of my servers it is running for a month without any problems.
Johannes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
Just curious, has
Russ Goodwin wrote:
On our old qmail server we allowed users to modify their own white/black
lists and SpamAssassin settings... we cobbled together maildrop scripts
and a squirrelmail plugin to expose the functionality.
I've searched the wiki and list archives, but I can't seem to find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam and Johannes,
Thanks for replying. Were there any issues with installed Perl modules,
etc? I have tried twice to upgrade and had to go back to the earlier
version both times. I'm running CentOS 4.5 and the latest (non-dev) qmt
files.
thanks,
Chas.
Running it
Russ Goodwin wrote:
At 08:35 PM 7/11/2007, Adam Cantwell wrote:
Russ Goodwin wrote:
On our old qmail server we allowed users to modify their own
white/black lists and SpamAssassin settings... we cobbled together
maildrop scripts and a squirrelmail plugin to expose the functionality.
I've
Need some help getting tmomail.net MMS messages into my qmail
server. Gmail.com has
apparently overcome the invalid sender issues which are blocked by
chkuser. Mail to
earthlink.net also succeeds.
My qmail / vpopmail: vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 Uses chkuser: v.
2.0.8 for vpopmail 5.3.x
On 5/26/2007 9:52 AM, slamp slamp wrote:
anyone using this in production? any issues?
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To
I have used the script with open SuSE 10.1 several times with no problems.
Adam
On 12/27/2006 9:58 AM, Daniel Persson wrote:
Is the skript on the qmailtoaster hompeage realy made for opensuse,
what i can see its made for the non open Suse 10.1.
I have been dealing with what I finally determined were SPF violations
for the past couple days and it has brought up the issue of SPF logging
- or rather the lack there of.
I have spfbehavior set to the default of 3. A particular client was
attempting to send an email through a MX not
Jake Vickers wrote:
Adam Cantwell wrote:
I have been dealing with what I finally determined were SPF violations
for the past couple days and it has brought up the issue of SPF
logging - or rather the lack there of.
I have spfbehavior set to the default of 3. A particular client
Adam Cantwell wrote:
I have been dealing with what I finally determined were SPF violations
for the past couple days and it has brought up the issue of SPF
logging - or rather the lack there of.
I have spfbehavior set to the default of 3. A particular client was
attempting to send an email
Howdy,
Does anybody have a good reason for why qmailadmin is compiled to allow
postmaster accounts to change mailbox quotas, including changing them to
unlimited?
Seems to me that considering the way most people would use the toaster
(hosting many domains), you would not want the
|
|
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-Mensaje original-
De: Adam Cantwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 16 de noviembre de 2006 12:27
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin quota management
Howdy,
Does anybody have a good reason for why
Eric Shubes wrote:
I'd like to see the basic toaster move in this direction. What will it take
to make this happen?
Mark Samples wrote:
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I also was wondering about this.
With unix accounts + sendmail every user has their own SA config file
at ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
To view the timestamp in normal format, you would use tai64nlocal.
So, you would do something like this for your smtp log:
cat current | tai64nlocal | more
Adam
On 6/13/2006 12:19 AM, Ing-Long Eric Kuo (DraconPern) wrote:
It seems to have worked. At least I got the test mail I sent just now.
OK, I have looked through the list archives and not been able to find
anything about this. A few months ago, I noticed that SuSE 10 was added
to the list of supported OS's for QmailToaster. This was great
because we have (my employer) all of our production servers running SuSE
and then had all
Great! Just what I wanted to hear. Thanks for your prompt reply.
Adam
On 6/7/2006 10:43 PM, Nick Hemmesch wrote:
Hi Adam,
This is temporary. This weekend we will have our SuSE 10.1 i586 and x86_64
packages available for download. We are nearing the end of our testing
proceedure.
Regards,
33 matches
Mail list logo
