Just updated my CentOS 5 machine’s clamav-toaster install to 0.99.3-1.0.14 and
everything went exactly as planned. Minimal downtime and the dreaded “qq-soft
reject” error is nowhere in sight. Thanks again, Eric.
This will hold me until I migrate to the waiting CentOS 7 server, probably in
the
This would explain why I was still seeing the soft reject errors even after the
signature fix.
So, build this fix from SRPM as we would any new version of Clam? Or is there
a different procedure?
-Sean
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 9:20 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
>
> No. I'm going to have to patch it..
Hi Jeff,
To answer your first question, the tcp.smtp file and related files now reside
in /etc/tcprules.d. As far as your second question goes, I haven't used
spamdyke so I can't speak to anything regarding that. Perhaps Eric or someone
with some more experience can help you there.
When you
e wrote:
>
> FYI - looking at Devuan, Slackware as a replacement for CentOS5.
>
> best wishes
> Tony White
>
>
>> On 4/03/2017 16:47, Sean P. Murphy wrote:
>> Happy to help, Tony.
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Tony White wrote:
>>
est wishes
> Tony White
>
> On 4/03/2017 16:00, Sean P. Murphy wrote:
>> Tony,
>>
>> This is an issue with a signature in the daily clamav database update. It
>> affects servers running on CentOS 5 due to the fact that they have a version
>> of pcre that
Stay safe out there.
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Sean P. Murphy wrote:
>
> Tony,
>
> This is an issue with a signature in the daily clamav database update. It
> affects servers running on CentOS 5 due to the fact that they have a version
> of pcre that clamav can
Tony,
This is an issue with a signature in the daily clamav database update. It
affects servers running on CentOS 5 due to the fact that they have a version of
pcre that clamav can't link to properly to form the database. CentOS 6 and 7
aren't affected. Supposedly the clamav folks have built
Yes. Usually two per post. The last few haven't "duped", though.
-Sean
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Tony White wrote:
>
> Yes.
> Actually getting three on occasions.
>
> best wishes
> Tony White
>
> On 22/07/2016 09:24, Jaime Lerner wrote:
>> YES. :)
>>
>> From: Eric
>> Reply-To:
>>