George Toft wrote:
Looking at the type of mail that I receive, 2.2-2.8 provides a good
balance of minimizing spam, and getting [virtually] no false positives.
Perhaps I'm trying to tune SA with the wrong tool (adjusting the score)?
When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a
I love the PBL - it immediately cut my spam by 60% (judging from the logs).
George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
623-203-1760
Eric Shubes wrote:
George Toft wrote:
Looking at the type of mail that I receive, 2.2-2.8 provides a good
balance of minimizing spam, and getting [virtually] no false
Putting yahoogroups in local.cf seems to have increased the spam score
by 0.9:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
server.northvalleycomputing.com
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
George Toft wrote:
Putting yahoogroups in local.cf seems to have increased the spam score
by 0.9:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on
server.northvalleycomputing.com
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
Hi Jake,
Here are the headers . . .
From - Wed Apr 11 00:56:31 2007
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 1176274162.6630.server.northvalleycomputing.com,S=18178
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Return-Path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6628
George Toft wrote:
Hi Jake,
Here are the headers . . .
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.3 required=2.2 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
That score is rather low in my opinion. The default required is 5.
Almost all of the scores in SA are geared to get it above the 5 score,
so almost all of them will
Looking at the type of mail that I receive, 2.2-2.8 provides a good
balance of minimizing spam, and getting [virtually] no false positives.
Perhaps I'm trying to tune SA with the wrong tool (adjusting the score)?
When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Maybe
I need a
George Toft wrote:
Closely related . . .
How do I whitelist based on a header field? I belong to a couple of
mailing lists and some messages are getting flagged as ***SPAM***.
Can I whitelist messages based on any of these headers:
X-eGroups-Approved-By: azipaegroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
Thanks, Jake.
Do you sleep? Answering e-mail at 3:54am? Yikes!
George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
623-203-1760
Jake Vickers wrote:
George Toft wrote:
Closely related . . .
How do I whitelist based on a header field? I belong to a couple of
mailing lists and some messages are getting flagged
Closely related . . .
How do I whitelist based on a header field? I belong to a couple of
mailing lists and some messages are getting flagged as ***SPAM***. Can
I whitelist messages based on any of these headers:
X-eGroups-Approved-By: azipaegroups [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web; 02 Apr
2007
Friends,
we have a phone system that will get a fax and then send it as an email.
the email is mostly an attachment ( tif )
my challenge is that these are being marked as ***spam***
I think ... i need to whitelist or somehow always let mail that is from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to come through. note
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
Friends,
we have a phone system that will get a fax and then send it as an email.
the email is mostly an attachment ( tif )
my challenge is that these are being marked as ***spam***
I think ... i need to whitelist or somehow always let mail that is from
[EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
