Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-17 Thread Cecil Yother, Jr.
On 02/15/2012 08:15 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 02/15/2012 08:33 AM, Dan McAllister wrote: I know I'm almost always the odd man out on issues like this one - the squeaky wheel, so to speak - but I too would like to see us additionally support Debian (or Ubuntu), as they are gaining in

[qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-15 Thread Eric Shubert
On 02/14/2012 11:46 PM, Pak Ogah wrote: please take a look at iredmail.org it support 4 mainstream distro - rhel/centos/scientific - debian/ubuntu - opensuse - freebsd There are some things about iredmail that I like, and others that I dislike (I'll let you guess which are which). I hope that

[qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-15 Thread Eric Shubert
On 02/15/2012 08:33 AM, Dan McAllister wrote: I know I'm almost always the odd man out on issues like this one - the squeaky wheel, so to speak - but I too would like to see us additionally support Debian (or Ubuntu), as they are gaining in popularity... and I like the idea of being a

[qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Eric Shubert
On 02/13/2012 10:58 PM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: What about Ubuntu server, would the team consider getting qmailtoaster to work with it? If not why? At some point, perhaps either debian or ubuntu server. In either case we'd be applying the When in Rome principle, and use debian packages

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Khan Mohamed Ashraf
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 02/13/2012 10:58 PM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: What about Ubuntu server, would the team consider getting qmailtoaster to work with it? If not why? At some point, perhaps either debian or ubuntu server. In either case

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Natalio Gatti
+1 to RHEL/CentOS. I started some with RH9, and then migrato to Fedora Core 1. That was one of my biggest mistakes. In two years Fedora reach Core 5. That's when I decided to move to CentOS. Happy since that day. On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf kmash...@gmail.comwrote:

[qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Eric Shubert
On 02/14/2012 01:23 AM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote: Dear Eric, First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I want to thank you for taking over the project now. As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster spin-off at openSUSE's build service.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Am 14.02.12 16:00, schrieb Eric Shubert: On 02/14/2012 01:23 AM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote: Dear Eric, First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I want to thank you for taking over the project now. As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread South Computers
Sounds good to me as well. Thought I'd pop in here and throw my 2 cents in :-) goes back to his hole Scott - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread James Beam
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY Sounds good to me as well. Thought I'd pop in here and throw my 2 cents in :-) goes back to his hole Scott

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Future Distros - RHEL/CentOS ONLY

2012-02-14 Thread Pak Ogah
On 02/15/12 0:27, James Beam wrote: /me plays wackamole 'Back into that hole Back!!' 2 Distros should be plenty for folks to deal with - helps yall refine the product and keep support efforts predictable. I agree with binary distribution so that can simplify updating system and I am also