[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Shubert
Dang. They're identical, which they should be. That's good. So how does rpm manage to install the packages in the sandbox, but chokes on them (sometimes) when installing them in the base system? I don't think I've run this stuff on COS 5.8 yet. Has anyone updated these packages with

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread G V
Here you go. rpm -qa | grep rpm | sort redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-32.el5.centos rpm-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 rpm-build-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el5.rf rpm-libs-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 rpm-python-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 Eric, thanks for your patience and continued help. This

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Shubert
These are essentially the same versions I have on my host. This error is intermittent too. For some packages, the problem never occurs. The first error you posted is from the sandbox. This last run, everything installed ok in the sandbox, and the error didn't occur until the upgrade to the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread G V
Yes using RAID1. And it looks like you are correct. Hard drive error. Error 1 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 27 hours (1 days + 3 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER ST SC SN CL CH

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Shubert
HW or SW raid? On 10/24/2012 02:33 PM, G V wrote: Yes using RAID1. And it looks like you are correct. Hard drive error. Error 1 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 27 hours (1 days + 3 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle. After command

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread G V
Software Raid. Both drives have the same 1 error. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: HW or SW raid? On 10/24/2012 02:33 PM, G V wrote: Yes using RAID1. And it looks like you are correct. Hard drive error. Error 1 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 27

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Shubert
Hmmm. Sounds peculiar. I'll let you take it from here. Please let us know how you make out. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 10/24/2012 03:45 PM, G V wrote: Software Raid. Both drives have the same 1 error. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread G V
Actually I was mistaken. This system does not use SW raid but rather LVM to join two drives together. Yes I will need to look into this problem. Thanks for all your help. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Hmmm. Sounds peculiar. I'll let you take it from here.

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Shubert
On 10/24/2012 03:45 PM, G V wrote: Software Raid. Both drives have the same 1 error. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote: HW or SW raid? On 10/24/2012 02:33 PM, G V wrote: Yes using RAID1. And it looks like you are

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Shubert
Did you enter yspace or something? It needs to match y or Y specifically (or nothing, as this is the default action). If you simply rerun qtp-newmodel, it should get you to that point again fairly quickly, recognizing that everything is already built and ready to go. On 10/22/2012 08:06 PM, G

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
Yes i did just y. This has happened before too. Then I have rerun it and it may do the same thing or it may work. I have tried mutliple times. I will try again. Thanks, George On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Did you enter yspace or something? It needs to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
It ran perfectly this time and restarted qmail. In the end it failed to unmount the sandbox. It still seems to not have updated. I have found one line in output and have it bold below. qtp-ami-up2date New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available: available: vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0 (installed:

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Shubert
This is very peculiar. What do you have for: # rpm -qa | grep fuse | sort What is the size and md5sum of your /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10.i686.rpm ? -- -Eric 'shubes' On 10/23/2012 09:52 AM, G V wrote: It ran perfectly this time and restarted qmail. In

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: This is very peculiar. What do you have for: # rpm -qa | grep fuse | sort rpm -qa | grep fuse | sort dkms-fuse-2.7.4-1.nodist.rf fuse-2.8.0-1.qtp fuse-unionfs-0.23-2.qtp What is the size and md5sum of your

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Shubert
For some reason, it appears that the part which copies the binary rpms out of the sandbox into the main filesystem is hosing the rpms somehow. Probably something to do with the unionfs. I seem to remember seeing your kernel version, but can't find it now. Please post: # qtp-whatami Thanks.

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Shubert
I've looked at the code a bit (it's been a while since I wrote this). It appears that there should be a /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS/ directory which is used for updating the actual RPMS. Do you have this directory? If so, please wipe it out, remove rpms from the build tree, and try again with a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
Here you go. qtp-whatami qtp-whatami v0.3.8 Tue Oct 23 11:03:44 PDT 2012 REAL_DIST=CentOS DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=5.8 QTARCH=i686 QTKERN=2.6.18-308.16.1.el5PAE BUILD_DIST=cnt50 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported and has been tested Thanks On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Eric

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
Eric, Thanks for all your help. Cleaned out those directories and tried again. Same issue. Starting the install/upgrade ... qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1 Here goes 'rpm -Uvh' for the packages we're processing ... /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10.i686.rpm: not an rpm package

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Shubert
Ok, George. Let's keep digging. There's something weird going on here. # cd /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS # ls -l *.i686.rpm # md5sum *.i686.rpm Then, with sandbox still mounted: # cd /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686 # ls -l *.i686.rpm # md5sum *.i686.rpm The file sizes and md5sums should

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-23 Thread G V
On 10/23/2012 9:47 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Ok, George. Let's keep digging. There's something weird going on here. # cd /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS # ls -l *.i686.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 307536 Oct 23 22:17 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10.i686.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 853017 Oct 23

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-22 Thread Eric Shubert
That's interesting (to me at least), George. You should be aware that when upgrading vpopmail-toaster, there are dependencies which need to be rebuilt, and qtp-newmodel will select these packages automatically. Keep us posted. Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 10/21/2012 09:05 PM, G V wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-22 Thread G V
I tried updating vpopmail-toaster and yes noticed those dependencies. It looked like all went well but in the end the updates were not installed. No errors in the build log either. qtp-build-rpms v0.3.7 qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1 Building vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0 ... Installing

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-21 Thread Eric Shubert
On 10/20/2012 10:26 PM, G V wrote: Thanks Eric. Had problem with first step. On 10/20/2012 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: There must be something a bit peculiar about this host then, or perhaps the combination of packages being updated. Let's try upgrading something simple first, by itself.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-21 Thread G V
Here you go. rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.6 clamav-toaster-0.97.3-1.3.44 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.10 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.6 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.6 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.7

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-21 Thread Eric Shubert
So let's try installing control-panel-toaster using qtp-newmodel. I haven't a clue as to why control-panel-toaster is not installed, but it doesn't really matter. If that's successful, then try upgrading qmailmrtg-toaster. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 10/21/2012 04:45 PM, G V wrote: Here you go.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-21 Thread G V
Eric, I installed control-panel-toaster without issue. I then went ahead and installed qmailmrtg-toaster followed by autorespond-toaster as per your previous instructions. Then also installed spamassassin-toaster, clamav-toaster and simscan-toaster together again as you instructed. At first i

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-20 Thread Eric Shubert
On 10/19/2012 09:29 PM, G V wrote: Just tried again. Removed rpms from both those directories and also /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/ Confirmed sandbox was not mounted before starting then mounted it while running qtp-newmodel. You should let qtp-newmodel create a *new* sandbox, not simply mount one

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-20 Thread G V
On 10/20/2012 8:39 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 10/19/2012 09:29 PM, G V wrote: Just tried again. Removed rpms from both those directories and also /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/ Confirmed sandbox was not mounted before starting then mounted it while running qtp-newmodel. You should let qtp-newmodel

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-20 Thread Eric Shubert
There must be something a bit peculiar about this host then, or perhaps the combination of packages being updated. Let's try upgrading something simple first, by itself. Please try upgrading only qmailmrtg-toaster, by itself. If that's successful, try autorespond-toaster by itself. If

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-20 Thread G V
Thanks Eric. Had problem with first step. On 10/20/2012 8:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: There must be something a bit peculiar about this host then, or perhaps the combination of packages being updated. Let's try upgrading something simple first, by itself. Please try upgrading only

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-19 Thread Eric Shubert
Did you have qtp-newmodel create a new sandbox after doing so? I think you'll need to do so. On 10/19/2012 10:29 AM, G V wrote: Thanks for the response. I have already tried that. On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Aleksander Podsiadły a...@mniow.pl wrote: Dnia 2012-10-19, pią o godzinie 06:02

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-19 Thread G V
Yes I have tried unmounting sandbox and recreating. I have also tried deleting rpms and also srpms. Still no go. On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Did you have qtp-newmodel create a new sandbox after doing so? I think you'll need to do so. On 10/19/2012

[qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-19 Thread Eric Shubert
Are you sure you deleted the rpm from /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686/? This is separate from the ones in /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/old-rpms/. Does qtp-newmodel rebuild the binary rpm in the sandbox, or say that it already exists? On 10/19/2012 02:08 PM, G V wrote: Yes I have tried unmounting sandbox

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: newmodel update issues

2012-10-19 Thread G V
Just tried again. Removed rpms from both those directories and also /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/ Confirmed sandbox was not mounted before starting then mounted it while running qtp-newmodel. I did notice that apart from updating packages it was also installing control-panel-toaster which I did not have