Hi.
Good comment about the Binary v Source - thats actually the strength of
this recipe as I a see it, it blends source packages and provides a neat
rpm install
The challenge is not so much the disk space as the memory requirement to
compile clam on the machine once the machine is deployed - man
Thanks - looks good, good price ...
Their distributions look up to the minute too - will give one of these a
shot.
David Bray
http://www.brayworth.com.au
da...@brayworth.com.au
On 1/05/2011 8:37 PM, Postmaster wrote:
Ref VMs try linode.com
Regards
Alex
Ref VMs try linode.com
Regards
Alex
On 01/05/2011 06:12, David Bray wrote:
I joined the Devel list as suggested, will look to what I can do there
With the VM's - who sells cheap VM's with Swap, I'm using vpslink, no
swap but ... only 512M - yes - M not k, used to have an XT with 512k,
I joined the Devel list as suggested, will look to what I can do there
With the VM's - who sells cheap VM's with Swap, I'm using vpslink, no
swap but ... only 512M - yes - M not k, used to have an XT with 512k,
upgraded it to 640k .. long time ago ...
They have a CentOS 5 option there - will
I've just used the QMT Recipe - and the good thing is the RPM based
Install, quite modular etc ..
but the version of SpamAssassin winds up at 3.2.5, SpamAssassin at
SpamAssassin is 3.3.1, Yum on Fedora 13 installs 3.3.2
I'm just trying to understand the reasoning behind sticking with a 3.2
based
Thanks for the Feedback
Understand about the Fedora Lifetime etc. I use VM's and Fedora 13 is
the current Fedora. Tried Ubuntu, CentOS and keep coming back to Fedora
- mainly because the php is more up to date
The driving line is not so much SA - SpamAssassin as Clam, on my last
server - Fedora
Am 30.04.2011 um 05:40 schrieb David Bray:
Thanks for the Feedback
Understand about the Fedora Lifetime etc. I use VM's and Fedora 13 is the
current Fedora. Tried Ubuntu, CentOS and keep coming back to Fedora - mainly
because the php is more up to date
The driving line is not so much
