On Thursday 08 November 2007, Martin Ritchie wrote:
oh, sorry guys forgot to hit send on this yesterday.
We don't seem to have a source artifact for .Net but for what we have
here is my:
+1
It is not viewed in a good light if you have to go to the general list
for IPMC votes. Given that
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 7:10 AM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
All releases by podlings must be approved by the IPMC. The conventional
Daniel is correct, you always have to go to the IPMC. Once qpid is
its own
oh, sorry guys forgot to hit send on this yesterday.
We don't seem to have a source artifact for .Net but for what we have
here is my:
+1
It is not viewed in a good light if you have to go to the general list
for IPMC votes. Given that we have four mentors(IIRC) then we
shouldn't really need to
08/11/2007, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 7:10 AM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
All releases by podlings must be approved by the IPMC. The conventional
Daniel is correct, you
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Martin Ritchie wrote:
Yes you have to go to the IPMC to approve the release. From my
understanding there is still some debate about the level of review
that the IPMC performs. Is it purely legal checks or are there
functional tests also done.
Purely legal.
That was precisely my thinking.
If we go to IPMC with the 3 mentor votes, then the Incubator folks will have
more confidence in voting for us.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 8, 2007 9:28 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that we have to go to IPMC for vote also, however one vote
+1 from me.
Paul
On Nov 8, 2007 2:45 PM, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was precisely my thinking.
If we go to IPMC with the 3 mentor votes, then the Incubator folks will
have
more confidence in voting for us.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 8, 2007 9:28 AM, Carl Trieloff
I know that we have to go to IPMC for vote also, however one vote early
in the
project we went to IPMC without mentor votes and we(qpid) got a
beating... So we
seem to have made it practice to ping the mentors and make sure at leasr
some
of the mentors have weighed in before we move the vote
Thanks Yoav.
--rajith
On Nov 8, 2007 10:33 AM, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 10:29 AM, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so as soon as Cliff votes, we can ping the incubator.
Btw, we have 4 mentors right? Yoav, Paul , Cliff and another person
Can
Ok, so as soon as Cliff votes, we can ping the incubator.
Btw, we have 4 mentors right? Yoav, Paul , Cliff and another person
Can anybody remember his name/find his email ? If so please ping him on
email and ask for his vote.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 8, 2007 10:00 AM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL
Hello Scott,
Could you please vote on the qpid M2 release?
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 8, 2007 10:33 AM, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 10:29 AM, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so as soon as Cliff votes, we can ping the incubator.
Btw, we have 4
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 10:29 AM, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so as soon as Cliff votes, we can ping the incubator.
Btw, we have 4 mentors right? Yoav, Paul , Cliff and another person
Can anybody remember his name/find his email ? If so please ping him on
email and ask for his
On 08/11/2007, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Martin Ritchie wrote:
Yes you have to go to the IPMC to approve the release. From my
understanding there is still some debate about the level of review
that the IPMC performs. Is it purely legal checks or are
+1
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Yoav Shapira
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:18 AM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ANN] M2 Release
Hey,
On Nov 8, 2007 7:10 AM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You can close the vote here without the 3 mentor votes providing enough
of your PPMC votes are there. Then call the vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Between the two votes, you need to have the three binding votes.
However, even if you get three votes here, you still have to call the
vote on
The vote has been running for 72 hours and so far we have got only one
mentor vote.
Can the remaning mentors vote, so we can close the vote and finalize the
release.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 6, 2007 8:06 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
Rajith Attapattu
Red Hat
Blog
+1
On 06/11/2007, Arnaud Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
+1
Folks,
Here are the details pertaining to the vote.
The signed artifacts for the M2 final release is available at
http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/
The keys are located at,
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/tags/M2/Final/java/KEYS
All artifacts can be
+1
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:46 -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Folks,
Here are the details pertaining to the vote.
The signed artifacts for the M2 final release is available at
http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M2/Final/
The keys are located at,
+1
On 05/11/2007, Alan Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:46 -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Folks,
Here are the details pertaining to the vote.
The signed artifacts for the M2 final release is available at
+1 from me as well, but I have to admit I only had time for very
cursory testing.
Yoav
On Nov 5, 2007 11:39 AM, Rupert Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 05/11/2007, Alan Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:46 -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Folks,
+1
+1
RG
+1
25 matches
Mail list logo
