At 11:52 PM + 12/28/2002, SimPanda wrote:
I have a Quadra 840AV that I found one day on my way home from work. I
brought it home, hooked it up to my monitor and keyboard, and found it
worked just fine. I decided to do a few upgrades on it by adding memory
and filling the vram slots. Since then
Sounds like something I had going on with one of mine... even tried it with
one known good memory module that turned out to be not-so-good, and was
causing the problem (though it would sit there for half an hour, finally
give the not-quite-chimes-crash, and I could reboot and use it...)
Try
At 00:15 -0500 on 29/12/02, Scott Holder wrote:
At 10:49 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Yes. You *need* the heatsink for the full 040 if you want it to keep working
longer than a few hours.
Well, I dunno about this. I have a 33mhz '040 with no heatsink in my Q605
running at 33mhz that had a
At 22:05 -0600 on 28/12/02, otto hansen wrote:
wow...well im glad I found this out..
would it work fine to take any heat sink that was big enough and just
attatch it with thermal glue?
I don't trust thermal glue any further than I can throw it, especially because
it's usually next to impossible
At 00:44 -0700 on 29/12/02, J Sand wrote:
Also by swapping this chip into my 610 from a 577, did I increase the CPU
speed from 20 to 33 or is there something on the MB I need to change
also to take advantage of the faster chip?
In order to make a part run faster, you have to modify the
Dan,
Out of curiosity, what software are you using for your webserver? I just put
one up on my q950 and installed some mail software to replace one of my many
ill-fated P3 systems and it keeps up really well. I was next thinking of
attempting an AU/X install on a q800 since its probably one of
When I first set up my 8600 as a web server I toyed with a lot of server
software, like Rumpus, WebStar, and even MS PWS. I found MacHTTP to be the
best HTTP server to suit my needs, and NetPresenz to be the best FTP server.
Both run simultaneously, ever single day, even right now, perfectly on
At 10:33 -0600 on 29/12/02, Dan Palka wrote:
No I did not reformat, 7.1 was installed on another, already partitioned by
7.5.5 hard drive that I used to keep documents on. So I'm guessing they were
Different hard drives cannot be compared by benchmarks because the hard disks
themselves are much
No actually its one 4gb drive with two 2gb partitions on it. 7.5.5 on one and
7.1.1 on the other.
Nice try though :)
-- From: Quadlist, Sun, Dec 29, 2002 --
At 10:33 -0600 on 29/12/02, Dan Palka wrote:
No I did not reformat, 7.1 was installed on another, already partitioned by
7.5.5
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:17:22AM -0500, the pickle wrote:
Furthermore, settings such as disk cache and disk driver version (did you
reformat between installs?) can dramatically affect benchmarking results.
This is true, but I did a comparison of 7.1 and 7.5.5, both fresh installs
with
Hallo,
discussing the speed of 7.1 and 7.5.5, I'm interested in the competition
of 7.6.1 with these.Any comments?
nb. Are there serious improvements in 7.5.5 compared to 7.5.3?
Frank
--
Quadlist is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com
Frank Schäfer wrote:
nb. Are there serious improvements in 7.5.5 compared to 7.5.3?
YES.
--
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.imagine2020.com/737724502
--
Quadlist is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To
At 14:34 -0600 on 29/12/02, Dan Palka wrote:
No actually its one 4gb drive with two 2gb partitions on it. 7.5.5 on one and
7.1.1 on the other.
Nice try though :)
Still doesn't make for valid results. Which partition is physically closer to
the spindle?
--
the pickle
FAQ
At 21:35 +0100 on 29/12/02, Frank Schäfer wrote:
discussing the speed of 7.1 and 7.5.5, I'm interested in the competition
of 7.6.1 with these.Any comments?
If you're gonna use 7.5.x, spend the $20 and upgrade to 7.6.1, because it's
about a bazillion times (yes, that's a technical term) more
At 14:29 -0500 on 29/12/02, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
This is true, but I did a comparison of 7.1 and 7.5.5, both fresh installs
with identical settings, the same networking, and as close as possible
on extensions and control panels.
7.5.5 was faster on my 50MHz '030 Mac IIci with 128MB of
The problem with 7.6.1 is I have to pay for it.
on 12/29/02 3:00 PM, Frederick Silliman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Schäfer wrote:
nb. Are there serious improvements in 7.5.5 compared to 7.5.3?
YES.
--
Quadlist is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog
on 29/12/2002, the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:35 -0600 on 29/12/02, Dan Palka wrote:
System 7.1.1 proved to be not just slower, but significantly slower in
several
key areas, the biggest being disk access. Speedometer reported that disk
access records were 143% in favor of
Anyone know where it went?
This page:
http://www.macrules.com/users/mjh/
has a link to a .mac address that doesn't work either.
Google Mac search gives no valid results.
I don't need the app, just want to link to it.
Tina
*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*^^*
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:32:23 -0500
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're going to be learning something from scratch, you might be best off
downloading MacPerl and using that. Perl was built from the ground up as a
text-handling language and from what little experience I have with it
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:25:19 EST
In a message dated 12/28/02 6:57:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... I'm not sure what the XC or B means yet, still learning.
RC is the package type: ceramic, pin-through hole, in this case.
B is the step, the particular revision
Jeff Walther wrote:
XC should read MC, meaning Motorola, not XC, and the LC will be
absent on a full function chip
Motorola often substitutes an 'X' for the 'M' in early runs of their
chips. I forget the exact explanation of the meaning, but it's
something like, this was an experimental
In a 610, the CPU chip is very close to
the power supply and that is a determining factor on the size of the heat
sink.
actually when I replaced the chip it was on the complete opposite side of
the MB than the powersupply and I dont think anything else was in the way
but when I bought the chip I
Hi
I'd like to boot different system folders from seperate partitions, what
do I need to do this under 7.1 as the startup disk CP is rather useless
for this as is Mt Everything.
Thanks
--
Quadlist is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com
Search for a program called SystemPicker. Its a control panel that you can
use to bless a system folder, no matter where it is.
on 12/29/02 9:48 PM, Sque at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'd like to boot different system folders from seperate partitions, what
do I need to do this under 7.1 as
Nah Its still not worth the effort. I'm fine with 7.5.5. Why upgrade when
I already think the OS is perfect. Theres nothing 7.6.1 could possibly give
me.
on 12/29/02 4:54 PM, Mark Benson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, Dec 29, 2002, at 22:52 Europe/London, Dan Palka wrote:
The
PowerTalk all around of course.
on 12/29/02 6:22 PM, Michael Dawe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7 Pro, with PowerTalk removed is the same as 7.1 upgraded with the
Scriptable Finder with the exception of one extra feature unavailable to
7.1, AFAIK. Very fast to boot, and runs in 3 Meg of RAM
26 matches
Mail list logo
