[quagga-dev 14824] Re: XR-Like Commit Feature

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, David Lamparter wrote: As for this discussion, the approach that seemed most fruitful in my view was to push transaction functionality outside of Quagga. There's no advantage to having it inside, since when it's properly modularised it looks like this: CLI

[quagga-dev 14823] Re: [PATCH 10/10] build: goodbye, gawk

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, neit...@marshlabs.gaertner.de wrote: Paul Jakma wrote: AWK is a lot more easier to pick up from scratch or just dive into for a C programmer - the syntax is more compact, and it's C-like. It's also just one binary. I agree, So, not just me? :) I

[quagga-dev 14822] Re: Community and governance

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Donald Sharp wrote: I believe I understand your logic. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I don't have to necessarily :) :) The one thing that concerns me most is the semantics of 'rounds keeper'. If I go and talk to someone outside of the quagga community and explain

[quagga-dev 14821] Re: Community and governance

On 3/3/2016 9:36 AM, Balaji Gurudoss wrote: > > > Why not call you, Vincent, and Greg the board of directors > > Sounds interesting. I guess we can have another name so that it sounds > more of an open source project. > How about: Project advisers? or Project shepherds? > and people with

[quagga-dev 14820] Re: Community and governance

On Mar 3, 2016 6:59 PM, "Donald Sharp" wrote: > > Paul - > > I believe I understand your logic. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I don't have to necessarily :) > > The one thing that concerns me most is the semantics of 'rounds keeper'. If I go and talk to someone

[quagga-dev 14818] Re: Community and governance

Paul - I believe I understand your logic. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I don't have to necessarily :) The one thing that concerns me most is the semantics of 'rounds keeper'. If I go and talk to someone outside of the quagga community and explain what I do( or am attempting to do ) in the

[quagga-dev 14817] Re: XR-Like Commit Feature

David - In addition to a write up would you be willing to present it at the monthly meeting? We have one in a few weeks and I think that would be a good place to get people familiar with it. thanks! donald On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:13 AM, David Lamparter < equi...@opensourcerouting.org> wrote:

[quagga-dev 14816] Re: XR-Like Commit Feature

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:09:45PM +, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Paul Jakma wrote: > > > Someone mentioned Vyatta had done some work in this area. I think Cumulus > > might have done some work on other interfaces into things too, but I'm not > > sure. > > Oh, and David

[quagga-dev 14814] Re: [PATCH 10/10] build: goodbye, gawk

You could just change Makefile.am to call extract.pl as argument to perl, as in: - ./$(EXTRA_DIST) $(vtysh_cmd_FILES) > vtysh_cmd.c + $(PERL) ./$(EXTRA_DIST) $(vtysh_cmd_FILES) > vtysh_cmd.c (On a random sidenote, it's really ugly to use $(EXTRA_DIST) like that...) On Thu, Mar 03,

[quagga-dev 14815] Re: [PATCH 10/10] build: goodbye, gawk

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:38:05PM -0500, Donald Sharp wrote: > On a side note, extract.pl.in as far as I can tell only is used to auto > generate the perl binary location. Hadn't looked at this before sending my previous e-mail, but - it actually uses more than the perl binary location: line

[quagga-dev 14813] Re: [PATCH 10/10] build: goodbye, gawk

On Mar 2, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Donald Sharp wrote: > On a side note, extract.pl.in as far as I can tell only is used to auto > generate the perl binary location. Is there a modern distribution that > doesn't have perl in /usr/bin? Would people mind if I removed the >