- I think it's great if you post your guide for others to see :) You
can always leave a disclaimer, such as no code has not been audited in
this particular case, however that it worked for a few of users who
tried it (it worked for me on my first try, more to come though). If
people have all
@Ivan
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 1:22:06 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> >> - I think it's great if you post your guide for others to see :) You
> >> can always leave a disclaimer, such as no code has not been audited in
> >> this particular case, however that it worked for a few of users wh
On 02/08/18 17:31, Yuraeitha wrote:
@Ivan
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 1:22:06 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote:
- I think it's great if you post your guide for others to see :) You
can always leave a disclaimer, such as no code has not been audited in
this particular case, however that it work
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 11:50:23 AM UTC-5, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> FYI I've just added a "Fresh install on R4" section. It's still a work
> in progress though: I get a cryptic msg in guest-win7-dm.log file a bit
> after the first part of the setup reboots the VM.
>
> qemu: /home/user/qubes-
On 02/08/18 20:00, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 11:50:23 AM UTC-5, Ivan Mitev wrote:
FYI I've just added a "Fresh install on R4" section. It's still a work
in progress though: I get a cryptic msg in guest-win7-dm.log file a bit
after the first part of the setu
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 2:19:19 PM UTC-5, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> On 02/08/18 20:00, Brendan Hoar wrote:
> > For your win7 HVMs did you, in this order:
> > - On the last tab, Services, add "meminfo-writer" and then uncheck the
> > checkmark?
>
> meminfo-writer isn't enabled on this VM (the l
By the way, if anyone is interested in pursuing this topic further, I'll
drop this link here where I've collected some resources and brainstorming
on porting KVM to Redox:
https://github.com/KVMarx/marx-planning
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes
On 02/08/18 22:03, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 2:19:19 PM UTC-5, Ivan Mitev wrote:
On 02/08/18 20:00, Brendan Hoar wrote:
For your win7 HVMs did you, in this order:
- On the last tab, Services, add "meminfo-writer" and then uncheck the
checkmark?
meminfo-
On Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 11:50:23 AM UTC-5, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> On 02/08/18 17:31, Yuraeitha wrote:
> >> so, I found some time and created this:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/taradiddles/qubes-notes/wiki/Windows-VM
> >>
> FYI I've just added a "Fresh install on R4" section. It's still a work
FYI I've just added a "Fresh install on R4" section. It's still a work
in progress though: I get a cryptic msg in guest-win7-dm.log file a bit
after the first part of the setup reboots the VM.
qemu: /home/user/qubes-src/vmm-xen-stubdom-linux/build/qemu/exec.c:1187:
cpu_physical_memory_snapsh
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 6:58:24 AM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> > FYI I've just added a "Fresh install on R4" section. It's still a work
> > in progress though: I get a cryptic msg in guest-win7-dm.log file a bit
> > after the first part of the setup reboots the VM.
> >
> > qemu: /home/user
what would KVM be bringing to the table in terms of benefits compared to Xen.
I see a list of what Xen does well (why it was initially chosen) and what KVM
still can not do or do as well as Xen. But what benefits does KVM bring that
Xen does not? As the opening topic was security how does KVM
Qubes OS version R4.0 (RC4)
fedora-26
After installing fedora-26 template new, and updating to latest build. I
configured sys-net to use this template.
dnf clean all
qubes.InstallUpdatesGUI or sudo dnf update
When using fedora-26 as the sys-net template... it seems to block the ability
to per
Fedora templates have a weird issue where the packet counter on the sys-net nat
FORWARD chain does not increment. The PREROUTING chain does increment.
The commands work, my configuration is correct, as it was working on R3.2 and
does work on R4.0 if using an older debian-8 template for sys-net a
On Friday, 9 February 2018 06:50:05 UTC, joev...@gmail.com wrote:
> Fedora templates have a weird issue where the packet counter on the sys-net
> nat FORWARD chain does not increment. The PREROUTING chain does increment.
>
> The commands work, my configuration is correct, as it was working on R3
15 matches
Mail list logo