-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 19:48, mojosam wrote:
> Andrew:
>
> Thank you for clarifying this. What you said is all in the
> documentation that I had already read, but I got lost trying to put
> it into perspective.
>
> The complicating factor is that I have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 12:39, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:13:48 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:11:04 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:04:28 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 11:34, 5qfppt+dtaepv4a6ll7k via qubes-users wrote:
>> Is this with or without an empty/blank key passphrase?
>
> Key is protected with a passphrase
>
In that case, there's no need to change the documentation, since it
already works
On Tuesday, 27 December 2016 23:03:31 UTC+11, Ines WALLON wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I try to install Windows 7 in HVM template and my VM displays
> "Starting Windows" and freeze.
>
> Windows 10 fully functional in HVM template but not qubes driver
>
>
>
>
>
Andrew:
Thank you for clarifying this. What you said is all in the documentation that
I had already read, but I got lost trying to put it into perspective.
The complicating factor is that I have a USB keyboard and mouse plugged into a
KVM switch, which is plugged into the computer. I need to
On Sunday, 18 December 2016 17:18:17 UTC+11, dumbcyber wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2016 01:07:12 UTC+11, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 2016-12-14 03:19, dumbcyber wrote:
> > > Hello, I am running Qubes from a 64Gb USB stick.
>
Here is the solution, it works fine:
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/2488
After installing with custom-config, the VM did not get stuck again. I was done
at #9.
Best regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To
I managed to free additional disk space by right-clicking on my drive,
selecting "Properties" and "compress all files". That way I could install the
latest Windows Tools. Qubes Private Image is now correctly displayed with
29.9GB of space, but the local disk drive (C:) is still at 19.8GB. If
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 2:52:28 AM UTC+3, alefo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1) have WL-167G
> 2) have a separate USB controller (aside from the one mouse and keyboard are
> set to)
> 3) create a VM (we'll use a Debian 8 one, fedora has exactly same bug, at
> least 23rd
Steps to reproduce:
1) have WL-167G
2) have a separate USB controller (aside from the one mouse and keyboard are
set to)
3) create a VM (we'll use a Debian 8 one, fedora has exactly same bug, at least
23rd one), make it a network VM (it'll be using a wifi usb dongle after all)
4) forward the USB
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 4:15:08 PM UTC-4, Douglas Harding wrote:
> I have reinstalled 4 times. Every time it was from a fresh install.
>
> A red "FAILED" pops up stating `[FAILED] Failed to start Load Kernel Modules`
>
> Then I get failed messages at the bottom:
>
> `nouveau
On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:13:48 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:11:04 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick
On 12/27/2016 12:12 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:29:55PM +0100, 'Olivier Médoc' via
> qubes-users wrote:
> > Maybe, Qubes installer bootloader could support both stable and unstable
> > kernels, in order to support new hardware ?
>
> I'd wait for the next
Is this with or without an empty/blank key passphrase?
Key is protected with a passphrase
Works fine for me with the default fedora-24 template.
Between fedora-24 or fedora-24-minimal, which one is more recommended in a
security perspective? What I mean is, using the standard fedora
On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:11:04 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> > > Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high
On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 2:04:28 PM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> > Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high level.
> >
> > I thought I would install dropbox client on one of my Fedora VMs so
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high level.
>
> I thought I would install dropbox client on one of my Fedora VMs so that
> working with files is much smoother than from a browser. So, is installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 09:35, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
>> Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high level.
>>
>> I thought I would install dropbox client on one of my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 08:56, 5qdxzn+46dbca9vmtsno via qubes-users wrote:
> So, this still doesn't work under the debian-8 template. After the
> update the QUBES_GPG_AUTOACCEPT stopped work and has no effect
> whatsoever in the cache timeout. Therefore it
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high level.
>
> I thought I would install dropbox client on one of my Fedora VMs so that
> working with files is much smoother than from a browser. So, is installing
So, this still doesn't work under the debian-8 template. After the update the
QUBES_GPG_AUTOACCEPT stopped work and has no effect whatsoever in the cache
timeout.
Therefore it would be advisable if this variable could be removed from the
documentation as it does not work and could potentially
On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 7:32:08 AM UTC-5, niely@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> This page [https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/live-usb/] says that Qubes OS Live is
> still in Beta-version.
>
> I'm wondering if this is than safe to use. Will I have the same
> security-benefits if I use the
I agree, redhat seems to always be finding the most crucial vulnerabilities in
linux. Also imo, fedora is the most secure big linux distro by default. (a
firewall on by default, selinux etc
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Features?rd=Security/Features) So we
know they take security
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 6:13:24 AM UTC-5, Patrick Bouldin wrote:
> Hi, I saw some threads on this but am not clear at a high level.
>
> I thought I would install dropbox client on one of my Fedora VMs so that
> working with files is much smoother than from a browser. So, is installing
OK, so setting a disposable VM to the sys-net seems to do the trick. Thanks for
your help!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks, I'll try that next time ~
For now, it seems I found a workaround by connecting via LAN, pull up the
landing page, disconnecting and connecting to Wifi, then accepting the form on
the landing page.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-12-27 07:14, creative.rebi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm behind a hotel NAT that hijacks the connection and tries to
> redirect to a landing page upon first connection.
>
> The NAT is implemented pretty terribly, I think it is hijacking DNS
>
I should add that things seem to work as expected if I bridge the connection
between my other computer and Qubes with a LAN cable and connect through that
computer. Both PCs will take me to the landing page and I have to accept for
each PC.
--
You received this message because you are
I'm behind a hotel NAT that hijacks the connection and tries to redirect to a
landing page upon first connection.
The NAT is implemented pretty terribly, I think it is hijacking DNS to bring
you to the landing page, so in another OS I have to load up a browser and
navigate to a specific ISP
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 6:32:41 PM UTC-7, ears...@gmail.com wrote:
> We all know Fedora is a big name, but is it a good choice for a Security
> Driven OS like QubeOS to be based around?
> What do others here think?
There are a lot of packages creating a bigger attack surface. but, bigger
Hello,
I installed a Win7 HVM template like described in the docs. It's working fine
but there is one thing I can't work out yet. I have now assigned 40GB of max
system storage and 30GB of max private storage. I started with the original
settings. Opening the appvm, my disk shows only 19.8GB
On 12/26/2016 08:30 PM, Drew White wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 08:52:22 UTC+10, Mailbe User wrote:
I think the hardest problem here is people putting aside their distro war
differences.
Here I see Joanna mention this; 'it should have the latest Desktop Environment
and Xorg drivers
32 matches
Mail list logo
