> So, idea - gpu passthrouth to hvm ?! unsuccessful
You can't pass a primary GPU.
>
> I have 16GB ram - Xentop says 15GB are used
>
> 11 domains: 2 running, 9 blocked, 0 paused.
>
> Mem 16696288k total, 15389884k used, 1306404k free.
>
> which is quite enough, but hvm maybe eat more ram.
> Did you install coreboot?
Yes.
bios: CBET4000 4.8-1344-g982c7555ad
>Nice! glad that still works
Ericsson F5521gw - 3G/GPS/HSPA work out of box in a dedicated USB VM but only
clearnet/VPN/wireguard. For Whonix and Tor need reed this
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:08 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 01:21 PM, stallmanro...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > ME disabled (works!)
>
> It is a nice laptop and I recommend it sometimes BUT:
>
> As someone with your screen-name I would hope you know that it is
> impossible to disable
On 08/20/2018 01:21 PM, stallmanro...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> ME disabled (works!)
It is a nice laptop and I recommend it sometimes BUT:
As someone with your screen-name I would hope you know that it is
impossible to disable ME.
In your case the BUP module still runs along with any mask roms -
Also, you can build your own linux and integrate it into Bios chip. It is
amazing. ;)
https://www.coreboot.org/Payloads
Payloads
Linux-Kernel
The Linux kernel can be used as a payload, and, if it fits into the flash ROM
chip, even a distribution can be a payload. But it’s more common to let
On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:00:43 PM UTC+3, jonbrown...@gmail.com wrote:
> Heyo,
>
> I am looking for the best laptop for Qubes 4.0+ to take advantage of all the
> features along with Heads. I know Heads only officially supports Lenovo
> Thinkpad 230 but is that the best choice to future
On Friday, 27 October 2017 09:17:49 UTC+1, rodge...@gmail.com wrote:
> 0. bios
>
> coreboot
>
> https://firmware.intel.com/learn/fsp/about-intel-fsp
> http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html
>
> 1. cpu
>
> SLAT (EPT) Intel VT-x
>
>
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 9:16:12 PM UTC-4, pixel fairy wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 2:23:56 PM UTC-7, J. Eppler wrote:
>
> > However, the initial question was what is the best or rephrase the
> > question: "what laptops work well with Qubes OS"? ThinkPad was mentioned a
> > couple of
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 2:23:56 PM UTC-7, J. Eppler wrote:
> However, the initial question was what is the best or rephrase the question:
> "what laptops work well with Qubes OS"? ThinkPad was mentioned a couple of
> times and Purism. Are there any other brands or options which have not
I have to agree with @cooloutac $ 500 for just the motherboard and a keyboard
is very expensive. You have to add the price for at least the CPU, power
supply, memory, housing (optional), storage, monitor, mouse to be able to
compare it slightly with a laptop.
However, the initial question
On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 2:19:53 AM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 09:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 2:39:19 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> On 06/27/2017 10:20 PM, cooloutac wrote:
> >>
> >>> its common sense to me man. Server boards are
On 06/28/2017 09:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 2:39:19 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
On 06/27/2017 10:20 PM, cooloutac wrote:
its common sense to me man. Server boards are designed for servers. I gave
some tips on how to get something compatible which I think is
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 2:39:19 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 10:20 PM, cooloutac wrote:
>
> > its common sense to me man. Server boards are designed for servers. I gave
> > some tips on how to get something compatible which I think is priority.
> > Another one is to
On 06/27/2017 10:20 PM, cooloutac wrote:
its common sense to me man. Server boards are designed for servers. I gave
some tips on how to get something compatible which I think is priority.
Another one is to research the board on linux forums and see if its used alot
or not or if it has
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 12:06:35 AM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 11:41 PM, cooloutac wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 11:14:32 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2017 10:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4,
On 06/27/2017 01:34 AM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
As for the Raptor Talos and POWER in general, yes, I totally agree
it's leaps and bounds better than other commodity options, but I
couldn't afford one, it wouldn't fit in my backpack, and even if it
would I'm also not interested in carrying
Anyone?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
How does Purism's Coreboot 'wrapper layer' compare to using Lenovo Bios,
American Trends etc? Do we know that closed source BIOSes do not contain
keyloggers to capture encryption passwords?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To
As for Purism, I have my gripes too, but at the end of the day I think
their existence provides a net-positive benefit to the community and
commodity hardware landscape.
Personally, I think Purism's marketing is perhaps a bit...
overoptimistic to a technical audience? And I do think they
On 06/26/2017 11:34 PM, cooloutac wrote:
I'm wrong, Purism doesn't have secure boot. future models supposedly will
though. along with tpm support.
RMS must of said it on fsf, or prolly his own website. I forget which. He basically said
secure boot "failed its intended purpose, so its ok
On 06/26/2017 11:41 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 11:14:32 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
On 06/26/2017 10:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
An intel gpu on an opteron
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 11:14:32 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 10:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
> >>
> An intel gpu on an opteron server board? and you wonder
I'm wrong, Purism doesn't have secure boot. future models supposedly will
though. along with tpm support.
RMS must of said it on fsf, or prolly his own website. I forget which. He
basically said secure boot "failed its intended purpose, so its ok to use for
security purposes"...
Well I
On 06/26/2017 10:57 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:57:17 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> > On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> > >> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:43:26 PM UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> >> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> I know this question has been
On 06/26/2017 10:30 PM, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this question has been asked many times but there is still no definitive
answer. The Purism laptops do not
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:30:23 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I know this question has been asked many times but there is still no
> > > definitive
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:27:32 PM UTC-4, cooloutac wrote:
> On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I know this question has been asked many times but there is still no
> > definitive answer. The Purism laptops do not have TPM support and in the
> > HCL
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:50:14 PM UTC-4, qubes...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know this question has been asked many times but there is still no
> definitive answer. The Purism laptops do not have TPM support and in the HCL
> list there is not a machine that ticks every box without issues. What
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
