On Thursday, January 15, 2015 08:41:17 AM Terje Mathisen did opine
And Gene did reply:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-am
d-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
You just can't stand being pointed at
Re. the Fitlet: With a 3.9 to 4.5 W power budget this box will never get
into those ranges, but even handling 1K requests/second with sub-ms jitter
and delay would still be a very nice Pool server.
A Raspberry PI can do 1500 packets per second.
That's a simple measurement with one request
: [ntp:questions] Nice fanless high-perf NTP server: Fitlet!
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen
terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Anyway it is definitely possible to get into the 100K to 1M
requests/second range.
As I noted above the real problem isn't in the actual packet processing,
which can be made very efficient indeed for the normal
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Charles Elliott elliott...@comcast.net
wrote:
Never tell a person he is wrong ...
I'm not sure what your point is but that statement is ridiculous. Frequent
and immediate correction is the PLL we want here. Wrong answers don't help
anyone.
By the way, you
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
By the way, you can't send mail to nom...@example.com. I'm sure being
somewhat anonymous enables statements like Harlan has decided to keep us
in the dark and feed us shit..
That was VERY TRUE on that topic!!
He did not tell us what was wrong and he grossly
Hal Murray wrote:
Re. the Fitlet: With a 3.9 to 4.5 W power budget this box will never get
into those ranges, but even handling 1K requests/second with sub-ms jitter
and delay would still be a very nice Pool server.
A Raspberry PI can do 1500 packets per second.
OK, that's pretty nice
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
it would seem to
be a nice NTPD startum 1 server.
Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a
network time server.
Which is what was suggested. After
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and SD
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
it would seem to
be a nice NTPD startum 1 server.
Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a
network time server.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
[Fitlet] includes a serial port which should make it trivial to attach a
Sure GPS board.
If they use a standard pinout. The PC-2i didn't support DCD which makes it
not quite trivial.
Hopefully the hardware
Paul wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
Terje
--
- Terje.Mathisen
Rob wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
It's in the subject, idiot!
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
.. although expensive compared to a Raspberry Pi, if somewhat better in
potential performance.
Among my (S1) clique of clocks the leading predictor of offset is network
connection not cpu.
As you might
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP server might be.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:23 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP server might be.
I would have assumed the accuracy with which ntpd disciplines the computer
The jitter variability (from loopstats) on one of my clocks is ~1e-7, on
Paul wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP
On 2015-01-15, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and SD storage connectors and
versions that support
22 matches
Mail list logo
