Hal Murray wrote:
In article 53298269.6000...@systematicsw.ab.ca,
Brian Inglis brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca writes:
Something like a Thunderbolt GPSDO feeding data, PPS, and 10MHz clock to a
chip executing instructions at some clock multiple and handling interrupts
in a deterministic time
The ustiming.org NTP server in NYC was consistently wrong for a long time;
I have not looked at it lately. If the government is going to privatize
serving time, then it has to exercise more effective oversight.
The other side of the coin is, where is the money in serving time?
The management
In article yvqdnqukc7qjb7fonz2dnuvz_vudn...@megapath.net, Hal Murray
hal-use...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net wrote:
In article 190320142025178186%joegw...@comcast.net,
Joe Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net writes:
The original issue was to be able to drop IRIG support in honor of PTP
via the
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
Sure. My point is I haven't seen a use case in this thread for nanosecond
*accuracy* relative to the TAI paper clock.
It is not for timestamping the moment of clicking in an online auction
or stock trade? Those people normally have infinite timestamping
On 2014-03-20, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
Sure. My point is I haven't seen a use case in this thread for nanosecond
*accuracy* relative to the TAI paper clock.
It is not for timestamping the moment of clicking in an online auction
or stock trade? Those
On 19/03/14 10:43, Martin Burnicki wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 18/03/14 10:17, Martin Burnicki wrote:
We have mades some tests and found that NTP can yield the same accuracy
as NTP if also hardware timestamping of NTP packets is supported on all
nodes, similar as for PTP.
In fact this
On 19/03/14 10:50, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:20:08PM +0100, Magnus Danielson wrote:
No, it's not. NTP is being perceived to be software timestamping
but nothing prohibits you from doing it in hardware. Similarly can
you implement PTP with software time-stamping (with
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
Sure. My point is I haven't seen a use case in this thread for
nanosecond
*accuracy* relative to the TAI paper clock.
It is not for timestamping the moment of clicking in an online auction
or
On 19/03/14 18:51, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
Martin Burnicki wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
Indeed. If you read the right article from 1990 you
also know you can do it on L1 C/A only by monitoring
both code and carrier phase, as their ionospheric
Hi Joe,
On 20/03/14 01:53, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5328ad2...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 18/03/14 01:24, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I've used IRIG-B004 DCLS before, for cables two meters long within a
cabinet. Worked well. How well do they handle
Joe,
On 19/03/14 11:55, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5328aaa6.70...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 18/03/14 01:36, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5327757e.5040...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Is that formal
11 matches
Mail list logo
