Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-13 Thread Martin Burnicki
Brian Inglis wrote: On 2015-01-12 00:32, Harlan Stenn wrote: Brian Inglis writes: Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.1k since maintenance improved after Heartbleed encouraged LF/CII and others to fund OpenSSL. Which OpenSSL version is currently required? Any way that support of updated OpenSSL

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-12 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2015-01-12 00:32, Harlan Stenn wrote: Brian Inglis writes: Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.1k since maintenance improved after Heartbleed encouraged LF/CII and others to fund OpenSSL. Which OpenSSL version is currently required? Any way that support of updated OpenSSL versions by ntpd could

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-12 Thread David Taylor
On 11/01/2015 21:00, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: [] To stop your inklings I've just wanted to integrate ntp client with my own software into common installer. Now I'm not convinced it was good idea, likely not. A lot of ntp's versions could make me more work every time and thus it doesn't

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-12 Thread Danny Mayer
On 1/12/2015 3:24 AM, Guy wrote: Brian Inglis wrote: On 2015-01-10 11:13, Martin Burnicki wrote: Please note that beside the NTP binaries you also need the openssl DLL in the version against which the binaries have been built, otherwise ntpd fails to start. ...an application

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-12 Thread Paul
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Danny Mayer ma...@ntp.org wrote: None of these are valid nor are they for you to use. Take down the mailing list/Usenet gateway. Or make it smarter. I would vote for the former. ___ questions mailing list

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-12 Thread David Taylor
On 12/01/2015 14:31, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2015-01-12 00:32, Harlan Stenn wrote: Brian Inglis writes: Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.1k since maintenance improved after Heartbleed encouraged LF/CII and others to fund OpenSSL. Which OpenSSL version is currently required? Any way that support

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread Rob
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-10, Rob nom...@example.com wrote: William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Hello William, 1. The installer is

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2015-01-10 11:13, Martin Burnicki wrote: Please note that beside the NTP binaries you also need the openssl DLL in the version against which the binaries have been built, otherwise ntpd fails to start. Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.1k since maintenance improved after Heartbleed

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread William Unruh
On 2015-01-11, Rob nom...@example.com wrote: William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-10, Rob nom...@example.com wrote: William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread trackeroftime
And this is a problem why? Not for me to determine. The OP posted this as a problem. You asked what it is branded means, and I explained. Sorry, I had thought you were the OP when I responded. Note that his definition of branded may be different from yours. And I still have no idea

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread William Unruh
On 2015-01-11, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: And this is a problem why? Not for me to determine. The OP posted this as a problem. You asked what it is branded means, and I explained. Sorry, I had thought you were the OP when I responded. Note that his

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread Martin Burnicki
Brian Inglis wrote: On 2015-01-10 11:13, Martin Burnicki wrote: Please note that beside the NTP binaries you also need the openssl DLL in the version against which the binaries have been built, otherwise ntpd fails to start. Current OpenSSL version is 1.0.1k since maintenance improved after

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-11 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2015-01-11 14:31, Martin Burnicki wrote: Brian Inglis wrote: On 2015-01-10 11:13, Martin Burnicki wrote: Please note that beside the NTP binaries you also need the openssl DLL in the version against which the binaries have been built, otherwise ntpd fails to start. Current OpenSSL

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread Rob
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Hello William, 1. The installer is branded: http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html I still have no idea what you are

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread trackeroftime
Assuming it's something like 4.2.8p1-beta5: 4.2.8P1BetaN are newer than 4.2.8 but they're not release candidates like 4.2.8.pN-RCm will be. You can see the 4.2 releases here: http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/. Thanks Paul for the explanation. Now it is clear. RCm is pre, betaM is

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 09/01/15 15:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. Does anybody know such binary package? I want to avoid compiling it by myself if I can. best regards Johny Johny, What

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread Martin Burnicki
Jan, I'm just replying to your post because it the most recent one in this thread. Jan Ceuleers wrote: On 09/01/15 15:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. Does anybody know such

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread David Taylor
On 10/01/2015 15:08, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: [] Where can I find changelog for the p1 and betas? I can't find it here: http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/NEWS best regards Johny http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ChangeLog-stable-rc -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread David Taylor
On 09/01/2015 23:55, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Hello William, 1. The installer is branded: http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html 2. The installer makes a lot of things. I need pure final and stable ntp. best regards Johny

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread Danny Mayer
On 1/10/2015 10:08 AM, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming it's something like 4.2.8p1-beta5: 4.2.8P1BetaN are newer than 4.2.8 but they're not release candidates like 4.2.8.pN-RCm will be. You can see the 4.2 releases here: http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/. Thanks Paul for the

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-10 Thread William Unruh
On 2015-01-10, Rob nom...@example.com wrote: William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote: On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Hello William, 1. The installer is branded:

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread Paul
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:57 PM, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, it is still not clear for me. If p1 is the latest release so why the files are marked as beta4, beta5? It looks like rc version, not final. Assuming it's something like 4.2.8p1-beta5: 4.2.8P1BetaN are newer than 4.2.8 but

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread William Unruh
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: W dniu pi??tek, 9 stycznia 2015 20:46:37 UTC+1 u??ytkownik David Taylor napisa??: On 09/01/2015 16:07, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks David, It is almost I'm asking but I guess (according to file names) there is

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread trackeroftime
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Hello William, 1. The installer is branded: http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html 2. The installer makes a lot of things. I need pure final and stable ntp. best regards Johny ___ questions

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread William Unruh
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem? Does anybody know such binary package? I want

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread trackeroftime
W dniu piątek, 9 stycznia 2015 16:27:55 UTC+1 użytkownik David Taylor napisał: On 09/01/2015 14:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. Does anybody know such binary package?

[ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread trackeroftime
Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. Does anybody know such binary package? I want to avoid compiling it by myself if I can. best regards Johny ___ questions mailing list

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread David Taylor
On 09/01/2015 14:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but unfortunately it is branded. Does anybody know such binary package? I want to avoid compiling it by myself if I can. best regards Johny Binaries alone are

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread David Taylor
On 09/01/2015 16:07, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks David, It is almost I'm asking but I guess (according to file names) there is not the latest final version (stable) but rather beta/devel or I am wrong. best regards Johny Johny, What I have their is the latest available. It is in

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread David Taylor
On 09/01/2015 19:46, David Taylor wrote: [] What I have their is the latest available. It is in the stable branch Arrgh! s/their/there/ -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows, not branded

2015-01-09 Thread trackeroftime
W dniu piątek, 9 stycznia 2015 20:46:37 UTC+1 użytkownik David Taylor napisał: On 09/01/2015 16:07, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks David, It is almost I'm asking but I guess (according to file names) there is not the latest final version (stable) but rather beta/devel or I am

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows

2014-12-22 Thread Martin Burnicki
A new GUI installer with ntp-4.2.8 for Windows is now available at our NTP download page: http://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/sw/ntp.htm#ntp_stable Martin Martin Burnicki wrote: Folks, ntp 4.2.8 has been released and includes a few security fixes. Unfortunatly these fixes which have been

[ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows

2014-12-20 Thread Martin Burnicki
Folks, ntp 4.2.8 has been released and includes a few security fixes. Unfortunatly these fixes which have been included after 4.2.7p485-RC break building the original tarball for Windows. I have a temporary fix for this and compiled 4.2.8 for Windows. A ZIP file with the binaries is

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.8 for Windows

2014-12-20 Thread Harlan Stenn
Thanks *very* much, Martin! H ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions