Hi,
I just tried --temp-basedir and I'm getting 312MiB. I don't know if that has something to do with it, or that this time I tried with a fresh instance, and last time I thought about checking the RAM after some time of normal browsing. Maybe it is like Abe mentioned and RAM incr
om the Manjaro repositories.
> I could try other methods, but besides htop and conky I don't know
> how. Conky's overall RAM usage matched the one I got with ps_mem,
> but I don't have configured so that you can see the processes and
> how much they are using. I could do that
t know how. Conky's overall RAM
usage matched the one I got with ps_mem, but I don't have configured so that
you can see the processes and how much they are using. I could do that for
testing though, if it were of any help...
Unlike what Abe notes, I didn't notice any RAM increas
Sometimes if I use both firefox and qutebrowser at the same time (so I can
be logged into two gmail accounts at once for example), the RAM usage gets
high enough that swap starts being used (even though I have 8GB of ram).
This only happens if I have a lot of tabs open (especially if they're
ot: I have the feeling that for a minimalistic
> browser, it uses too much RAM. I just compared to other browsers and
> this is what I got, having the same amount of tabs (five) open with
> the exact same websites:
>
> midori: 154.8 MiB
> otter browser: 286.6 MiB
> qupzilla: 19
Hi,
First of all, I just discovered qutebrowser, and congratulations (and thanks)
for such a good piece of software.
I'm not really sure this is an issue, but I thought I rather say something than
not: I have the feeling that for a minimalistic browser, it uses too much RAM.
I
