Full_Name: Timo Becker
Version: 2.1.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (193.170.87.36)
Hi!
The following command causes Windows XP to freeze so that I can only pull the
plug:
> plot(seq(1, 44100), rnorm(44100), type="l")
This does not happen with
> plot(seq(1, 44100), rnorm(44100))
and
>
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Gregor GORJANC wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
Are you saying that it is given i
Thank you for the patch.
To clarify: this is not a bug. ?.C says
The mapping of the types of R arguments to C or Fortran arguments
in '.C' or '.Fortran' is
R C Fortran
integerint * integer
numericdouble *double precision
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
>>
>> http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
>>
>> at
>>
>> http://developer.r-project.org/.
>
>
> Are you saying that it is given incor
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
Are you saying that it is given incorrectly? I can't see it.
That site is for the development of R, n
On Wed, 11 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
> works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,
>
>> x <- 1
>> y <- 0.2
>> x %/% y
> [1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux
I get 5 on Windows, but
> (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1
so is ther
On 11/05/2005, at 11:26 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
There seem to be problems in the autoconf stuff. cos and sin are
being located in libm but the link line you show has no '-lm' which
accounts for 6 of the 7 missing symbols. Also gettext seems to have
been located by the configure script, but there i
Uwe,
> - Where is *lexical* scoping involved?
Abuse of "notation". I intended to say scoping.
> - Are you really calling you code from a clean workspace?
Yes it is clean.
> - Why don't use pass "g" through optim() to f? Please do so, because it
> might be a scoping problem.
Tried that. Still n
--- dotcode.c2004-09-05 02:31:57.0 -0700
+++ /usr/local/src/R-2.0.0/src/main/dotcode.c2005-05-11
12:24:11.0 -0700
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@
static void *RObjToCPtr(SEXP s, int naok, int dup, int narg, int Fort,
const char *name, R_toCConverter **converter,
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
It's easy to launch Google and find mentioned page, but it took me quite
some time to do this, because I was sure, that it is noted somew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,=20
Certainly looks like a bug on Windows to me. I'm going offline for a
day very soon now, but I'll try to remember to look into it.
Duncan Murdoch
x <- 1
y
Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,=20
> x <- 1
> y <- 0.2
> x %/% y
[1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux
version
_ =20
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386 =20
os mingw32 =20
system
"McGehee, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but from ?"%%":
> "It is guaranteed that 'x == (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to rounding
> error) ..."
>
> (R 2.1.0)
> > x <- 1
> > y <- 0.2
> > x %% y
> [1] 0.2
> > (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
> [1] 1.2
>
> Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the
"McGehee, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but from ?"%%":
> "It is guaranteed that 'x == (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to rounding
> error) ..."
>
> (R 2.1.0)
> > x <- 1
> > y <- 0.2
> > x %% y
> [1] 0.2
> > (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
> [1] 1.2
>
> Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the
Yes, but from ?"%%":
"It is guaranteed that 'x =3D=3D (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to =
rounding
error) ..."
(R 2.1.0)
> x <- 1
> y <- 0.2
> x %% y
[1] 0.2
> (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1.2
Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and
these seem like large enough numbe
Yes, but from ?"%%":
"It is guaranteed that 'x == (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to rounding
error) ..."
(R 2.1.0)
> x <- 1
> y <- 0.2
> x %% y
[1] 0.2
> (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1.2
Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and
these seem like large enough numbers to
On 11-May-05 Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> The following can't be right,
>> first rw2010:
>>
>> > 1 %% 0.001
>> [1] 0.001
>>
>> Then rw2001:
>>
>> > 1 %% 0.001
>> [1] -2.081668e-17
>> >
>>
>> and the last seems about right.
>
> A negative remainder? I don't think
Full_Name: Keith Frost
Version: 2.0.0
OS: Linux i686 (RH 9)
Submission from: (NULL) (66.162.141.10)
If I create the C function:
void test_raw(unsigned char *raw, int *out)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++)
out[i] = raw[i];
}
and dyn.load the resulting library, then call
.C("test_raw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The following can't be right,
> first rw2010:
>
> > 1 %% 0.001
> [1] 0.001
>
> Then rw2001:
>
> > 1 %% 0.001
> [1] -2.081668e-17
> >
>
> and the last seems about right.
A negative remainder? I don't think so. Presumably the result comes
from
o %% now wa
The following can't be right,
first rw2010:
> 1 %% 0.001
[1] 0.001
Then rw2001:
> 1 %% 0.001
[1] -2.081668e-17
>
and the last seems about right.
--
Kjetil Halvorsen.
Peace is the most effective weapon of mass construction.
-- Mahdi Elmandjra
--
No virus found in t
> Bill Northcott writes:
> On 11/05/2005, at 8:04 PM, Ralf Seppel wrote:
>> we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster "Jump" at the
>> research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
>> http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
>> using the most recent version of R (2.1.0)
On 11/05/2005, at 8:04 PM, Ralf Seppel wrote:
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster "Jump" at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation ins
Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 550 user unknown
Time: 11 May 2005 15:02:30
Scan result: Mail rejected
Protocol: SMTP in
File Name\Mail Subject: mail_1115724604: Re: Excel file
Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Details: document_excel.pif Infected with Win32.Netsky
You don't understand what rank() does: it is not the same as sort.list but
rather the reverse (in the absence of ties).
> x<- c(2,-5,1,3);x
[1] 2 -5 1 3
> y <- x
> y[rank(x)] <- x
> y
[1] -5 1 2 3
The ranks are the numbers in the ordering, and -5 is the smallest and so
has rank 1, and so
Full_Name: Stella David
Version: 2.1.0
OS: mingw32
Submission from: (NULL) (137.250.161.136)
It seems that rank doesn't work right on vectors containing negative values.
If the negative value is the first component or there are only two components,
it works, but if the negative value is somewhere
Hi
in a .Rd file, in a \deqn{} environment, how do I typeset a matrix in
latex?
I have
\deqn{\left(\begin{bmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{bmatrix}\right)}{omitted}
but this doesn't give me the 2-by-2 matrix desired.
Is there a manpage somewhere with a matrix that I could adapt?
--
Robin Hankin
Uncertainty
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Ralf Seppelt wrote:
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster "Jump" at the research
centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installa
Ralf Seppelt wrote:
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster "Jump" at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation instructions.
H
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster "Jump" at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation instructions.
After ./configure we
> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Baud-Bovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 10 May 2005 19:00:53 +0200 writes:
Gabriel> Hi Martin,
Gabriel> Thanks for your reply. I am responding on r-devel to
Gabriel> provide some examples of outputs of the function that
Gabriel> I had list in the
30 matches
Mail list logo
