Giuseppe Ragusa wrote:
I have two machines a linux_amd64_x86 (gentoo_amd64) and a linux_x86. Both run
R-2.1.0. I have a very long program (hopefully will become a package)
that works perfectly on the linux_amd_x64. Great means no error, no
problems and results that, where the analytic solution
Gabriel == Gabriel Baud-Bovy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 10 May 2005 19:00:53 +0200 writes:
Gabriel Hi Martin,
Gabriel Thanks for your reply. I am responding on r-devel to
Gabriel provide some examples of outputs of the function that
Gabriel I had list in the post-scriptum of
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster Jump at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation instructions.
After ./configure we
Ralf Seppelt wrote:
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster Jump at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation instructions.
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Ralf Seppelt wrote:
Dear All,
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster Jump at the research
centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
Hi
in a .Rd file, in a \deqn{} environment, how do I typeset a matrix in
latex?
I have
\deqn{\left(\begin{bmatrix}ab\\cd\end{bmatrix}\right)}{omitted}
but this doesn't give me the 2-by-2 matrix desired.
Is there a manpage somewhere with a matrix that I could adapt?
--
Robin Hankin
Uncertainty
You don't understand what rank() does: it is not the same as sort.list but
rather the reverse (in the absence of ties).
x- c(2,-5,1,3);x
[1] 2 -5 1 3
y - x
y[rank(x)] - x
y
[1] -5 1 2 3
The ranks are the numbers in the ordering, and -5 is the smallest and so
has rank 1, and so on.
Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 550 user unknown
Time: 11 May 2005 15:02:30
Scan result: Mail rejected
Protocol: SMTP in
File Name\Mail Subject: mail_1115724604: Re: Excel file
Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Details: document_excel.pif Infected with
On 11/05/2005, at 8:04 PM, Ralf Seppel wrote:
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster Jump at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly following the
installation
Bill Northcott writes:
On 11/05/2005, at 8:04 PM, Ralf Seppel wrote:
we're trying to implement R on the IBM p690 cluster Jump at the
research centre in Jülich, Germany (c.f.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/nic/Supercomputer/computer-e.html)
using the most recent version of R (2.1.0) and precisly
The following can't be right,
first rw2010:
1 %% 0.001
[1] 0.001
Then rw2001:
1 %% 0.001
[1] -2.081668e-17
and the last seems about right.
--
Kjetil Halvorsen.
Peace is the most effective weapon of mass construction.
-- Mahdi Elmandjra
--
No virus found in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following can't be right,
first rw2010:
1 %% 0.001
[1] 0.001
Then rw2001:
1 %% 0.001
[1] -2.081668e-17
and the last seems about right.
A negative remainder? I don't think so. Presumably the result comes
from
o %% now warns if its
Full_Name: Keith Frost
Version: 2.0.0
OS: Linux i686 (RH 9)
Submission from: (NULL) (66.162.141.10)
If I create the C function:
void test_raw(unsigned char *raw, int *out)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i = 255; i++)
out[i] = raw[i];
}
and dyn.load the resulting library, then call
.C(test_raw,
On 11-May-05 Peter Dalgaard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following can't be right,
first rw2010:
1 %% 0.001
[1] 0.001
Then rw2001:
1 %% 0.001
[1] -2.081668e-17
and the last seems about right.
A negative remainder? I don't think so. Presumably the result comes
Yes, but from ?%%:
It is guaranteed that 'x =3D=3D (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to =
rounding
error) ...
(R 2.1.0)
x - 1
y - 0.2
x %% y
[1] 0.2
(x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1.2
Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and
these seem like large enough numbers to not
McGehee, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but from ?%%:
It is guaranteed that 'x == (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to rounding
error) ...
(R 2.1.0)
x - 1
y - 0.2
x %% y
[1] 0.2
(x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1.2
Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would
McGehee, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but from ?%%:
It is guaranteed that 'x == (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to rounding
error) ...
(R 2.1.0)
x - 1
y - 0.2
x %% y
[1] 0.2
(x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1.2
Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would
Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,=20
x - 1
y - 0.2
x %/% y
[1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux
version
_ =20
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386 =20
os mingw32 =20
system
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,=20
Certainly looks like a bug on Windows to me. I'm going offline for a
day very soon now, but I'll try to remember to look into it.
Duncan Murdoch
x - 1
y
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
It's easy to launch Google and find mentioned page, but it took me quite
some time to do this, because I was sure, that it is noted
--- dotcode.c2004-09-05 02:31:57.0 -0700
+++ /usr/local/src/R-2.0.0/src/main/dotcode.c2005-05-11
12:24:11.0 -0700
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@
static void *RObjToCPtr(SEXP s, int naok, int dup, int narg, int Fort,
const char *name, R_toCConverter **converter,
Uwe,
- Where is *lexical* scoping involved?
Abuse of notation. I intended to say scoping.
- Are you really calling you code from a clean workspace?
Yes it is clean.
- Why don't use pass g through optim() to f? Please do so, because it
might be a scoping problem.
Tried that. Still no luck.
On 11/05/2005, at 11:26 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
There seem to be problems in the autoconf stuff. cos and sin are
being located in libm but the link line you show has no '-lm' which
accounts for 6 of the 7 missing symbols. Also gettext seems to have
been located by the configure script, but there
On Wed, 11 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux
works as you suggest. But for me on Windows,
x - 1
y - 0.2
x %/% y
[1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux
I get 5 on Windows, but
(x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)
[1] 1
so is there a problem
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
Are you saying that it is given incorrectly? I can't see it.
That site is for the development of R,
25 matches
Mail list logo
