Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 20 Aug 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Samuelson, Frank* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I encountered a similar problem with
1. Intel compilers.
2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox)
Ooops. I didn't notice #2 the first time
I encountered a similar problem with
1. Intel compilers.
2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kruus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] R-devel and gcc 3.4
I tried
Samuelson, Frank* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I encountered a similar problem with
1. Intel compilers.
2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox)
Ooops. I didn't notice #2 the first time around. If we're failing the
checks with no optimization, then we surely have set the tolerances
too
Here:
CFLAGS=-Os -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer
Will try some other flags to see if that is an issue.
comparing 'd-p-q-r-tests.Rout' to './d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save'
...196,227d195 [1] Mean scaled difference: 230.9933
[1] Mean scaled difference: 16.72081
[1] Mean scaled
Robert == Robert Kruus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:33:33 -0400 writes:
Robert Here: CFLAGS=-Os -march=athlon-xp -pipe
Robert -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer
is this now gcc (w/o -O) or the intel one?
In any case, your numeric results seem completely off target,
not just
gcc. Sorry for the double post.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:02:32 +0200 it is rumored
that Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert == Robert Kruus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:33:33 -0400 writes:
Robert Here: CFLAGS=-Os -march=athlon-xp -pipe
Robert
Seems to be something with the Os flag.
Will investigate further.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:24:18 -0400
Robert Kruus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc. Sorry for the double post.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:02:32 +0200 it is rumored
that Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert == Robert
On 20 Aug 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Samuelson, Frank* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I encountered a similar problem with
1. Intel compilers.
2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox)
Ooops. I didn't notice #2 the first time around. If we're failing the
checks with no optimization,
