Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Update: On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 17:40, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue here. :( I mounted a smb > share, created a symlink from ~/R, and installed dplyr without any > issue (apart from the installation process taking ages). Fortunately, > this rules out our

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue here. :( I mounted a smb share, created a symlink from ~/R, and installed dplyr without any issue (apart from the installation process taking ages). Fortunately, this rules out our binary R package as responsible for the issue you are experiencing,

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Tom Callaway
The log of you running configure on your instance allows me to compare it to the log of when we build it as a package (you don't need to provide that one). Honestly, I have no idea right now _why_ pre-built R would fail to move files to a cifs share when a non-root user can do it. I'm hoping

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Tom Callaway
Okay, so if it's not SELinux... perhaps something about how R is being configured is different? Can you provide a log of the output (including the commandline with any options passed) for configure? Also, can you provide the specific mount options for the cifs share? ~spot On Mon, Jun 12, 2023

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Ok, then last check before trying to reproduce this locally: is the staged installation enabled too in the cases you don't see this issue? Iñaki On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 15:12, Alexandre Courtiol wrote: > > Thanks for the tip but nope: SELinux is off on that system... > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Alexandre Courtiol
Thanks for the tip but nope: SELinux is off on that system... On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 13:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 13:19, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > Hmm, that's a weird one. Is SELinux on and enforcing on that setup? > > I was going to bet on the same thing. :) But let me

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 13:19, Tom Callaway wrote: > > Hmm, that's a weird one. Is SELinux on and enforcing on that setup? I was going to bet on the same thing. :) But let me add: if the answer is affirmative, and this doesn't happen with SELinux disabled, then *the answer is NOT to disable

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Tom Callaway
Hmm, that's a weird one. Is SELinux on and enforcing on that setup? ~spot On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 6:55 AM Alexandre Courtiol < alexandre.court...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Fedora-R enthusiasts, > > We are experiencing some issues with the binary releases of R 4.3 for > Fedora 37 & 38 when running

[R-sig-Fedora] Problem with R, staged installation for packages, and samba share

2023-06-12 Thread Alexandre Courtiol
Dear Fedora-R enthusiasts, We are experiencing some issues with the binary releases of R 4.3 for Fedora 37 & 38 when running it on our infrastructure. The issue is that packages won't install, unless the (default) staged installation process for packages is switched off (--no-staged-install).