[R-sig-phylo] doubt

2015-07-03 Thread Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo
Mesquite and online platforms, but I did not get the solution. Is there any method that enable the insertion of additional species in a time calibrated phylogeny without losing branch length information? Thank you all in advance -- Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo (PhD Student in Animal Biology at UNESP

Re: [R-sig-phylo] doubt

2015-07-06 Thread Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo
are scaled: newLength-tree$root.time-tipAge-nodeheight(tree,node) tree1-bind.tip(tree,tip.label,where=node,edge.length=newLength) Cheers, -Dave On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo sayuriou...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Liam, Thank you very much for help me! My tree

[R-sig-phylo] diversification rates

2018-04-14 Thread Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo
plits")$w^-1 Thank you in advance, -- Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo (PhD Student in Animal Biology at UNESP/IBILCE) [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinf

Re: [R-sig-phylo] diversification rates

2018-04-15 Thread Lilian Sayuri Ouchi de Melo
equal splits metric (but not calculated in that way). > Jetz et al 2012 use the species-level lineage diversification rate, which > is actually calculated by taking the inverse of the equal splits metric. > > Hope that clears things up, > Will > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM