Re: [R-sig-phylo] Comparing DIC of phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic GLMM run with MCMC (MCMCglmm)

2018-06-21 Thread Liam Kendall
Thank you all for your very informative responses. I will try the brms package as Jon suggested - I have read a bit about WAIC being more appropriate or favourable than the DIC but I was (until now) unfamiliar with the brms package. We are very much working within a predictive framework where m

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Comparing DIC of phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic GLMM run with MCMC (MCMCglmm)

2018-06-21 Thread Jarrod Hadfield
Hi Liam, In multi-level models DIC can be 'focused' at different levels. In MCMCglmm, DIC is focussed at the highest possible level because this is the only level at which it can be analytically computed for non-Gaussian models. The highest level is not the level at which most scientists want

[R-sig-phylo] Comparing DIC of phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic GLMM run with MCMC (MCMCglmm)

2018-06-21 Thread jonnations
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:13:28 +1000 > From: Liam Kendall > To: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org > Subject: [R-sig-phylo] Comparing DIC of phylogenetic and > non-phylogenetic GLMM run with MCMC (MCMCglmm) > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >

[R-sig-phylo] Comparing DIC of phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic GLMM run with MCMC (MCMCglmm)

2018-06-20 Thread Liam Kendall
Dear all, I am conducting an analysis predicting insect body sizes using a co-varying trait and their biogeographic region within two model formulations using MCMCglmm. The first model has the structure: log(Weight) ~ log(Trait)+ Biogeography + Family (i.e. Taxonomic family of species) The s