Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v8.3

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 12:44 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Developers < racket-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > * Redex rules get optional names. > > This one should probably be: "Redex's stepper's GUI shows IO-judgment form rule names" Robby > * Many bug fixes! > > > >

Re: [racket-dev] Making changes to a Racket package

have to worry about it.) And the "extra-pkgs" directory is just the convention some of us use. Robby On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:10 PM John Kemp wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2021, at 3:49 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: > > > > I think you probably want to use "raco update

Re: [racket-dev] Making changes to a Racket package

I think you probably want to use "raco update --clone math" and you'll end up with a directory named "math": where you run that that is a clone of the racket/math github repo and the racket installation you ran "raco" from will now use that as the source. Then you can add a remote to it with your

Re: [racket-dev] How to contribute to Dr. Racket IDE?

Hi Conor: thanks for your interest in DrRacket. To build it, run "make" in the top-level of a checkout of the main racket repository. As for the rest, I think that there are things related to some of what you want, but probably not exactly what you have asked for. Robby On Wed, May 6, 2020 at

Re: [racket-dev] Adding project-level scoping to raco pkg install

DrRacket itself. > > With that said, I think the approach Matthew outlined would take a big > step, and would let us find out if we needed more steps, and what they > might be. > > Sam > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:59 PM Robby Findler > wrote: > > > > I'm not fa

Re: [racket-dev] Adding project-level scoping to raco pkg install

ons complicates that a bit. > Sam mentioned on the Slack that this problem could be approached in terms > of 'raco link', but it would lead to a large scope of work. I wonder how > much that overlaps here. > > > > > Original Message ---- > On

Re: [racket-dev] Adding project-level scoping to raco pkg install

I'm trying to understand what you guys are talking about here and am not sure I'm getting it. Is the idea that a "project" (new term definition) would be a place one can install a package and its dependencies in a way that avoids any conflicts with other pkgs that are already installed (even if

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

up a bit of a can of worms in that I’m not sure whether the docs > currently has a good place for “discussion of changes relevant to a > particular release.” I guess I was thinking that just appending it to the > release notes would be simpler. > > John > > > On Feb 1, 202

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

er place to put the > deeper information. > > John > > > On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:12, Robby Findler wrote: > > > > Looks like two bullets to me. Here's an edit: > > > > > > * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of >

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

Looks like two bullets to me. Here's an edit: * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of handling client connections (timeouts, buffer sizes, maximum header counts, etc.) via the new "safety limits" construct. * The web server's default level of trust in

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:07 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > > At Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:37:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > > [...] there is a problem on windows that makes > > many of them moot (because we cannot seem to reliably detect when the > > OS is in dark mode

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

an, Bogdan Popa, Brian Wignall, Dan Holtby, David K. Storrs, > Dionna Glaze, Dominik Pantůček, Fred Fu, Geoff Shannon, Gustavo > Massaccesi, Jack Firth, Jay McCarthy, Jens Axel Søgaard, Jesse Alama, > Joel Dueck, John Clements, Jordan Johnson, Julien Delplanque, Leo Uino, > Luka Hadž

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

ors: Alex Harsanyi, Alex Knauth, Alex Muscar, Alexis King, Ben >> Greenman, Bogdan Popa, Brian Wignall, Dan Holtby, David K. Storrs, >> Dionna Glaze, Dominik Pantůček, Fred Fu, Geoff Shannon, Gustavo >> Massaccesi, Jack Firth, Jay McCarthy, Jens Axel Søgaard, Jesse Alama, >> Joe

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.6

On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:19 AM 'John Clements' via dev-redirect wrote: > > The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please > mail me new items and/or edits. > > Please phrase announcements using complete sentences and avoid the > word "now". >

Re: [racket-dev] Continuous Integration update and future

I think it is wonderful that you're doing this. Thank you! Robby On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 2:50 AM Paulo Matos wrote: > > > Paulo Matos writes: > > > Summary: We currently have 5 CI systems: Travis, Azure, Gitlab, AppVeyor, > > and DrDr. I explain what I have done so far in Gitlab and propose > >

Re: [racket-dev] time to move off google groups?

Thanks, Neil for alerting the community to the problem. As a long-time member of the Racket world, I'm sure you are aware of the difficulties we have had trying to make sure we have the right community discussion forum IT infrastructure. Perhaps the next time someone takes the time to

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.2

Some starter sentences. On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:01 PM Vincent St-Amour wrote: > Dan Feltey > - collapsible contracts The contact system supports collapsible contracts, which avoid repeated wrappers in certain pathological situations. Thanks to Daniel Feltey. > Robby Findler / Laure

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.1

But maybe it should. I'll leave that decision to others. Here's a candidate sentence: - New users of DrRacket will open files into new tabs (by default). Robby On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 3:43 PM Robby Findler wrote: > > I don't think the tabs default change rises to the

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v7.1

fca95f4da9d803d89622883c73d9a718daa @ racket > > Alexis King > - support for kw arguments in curry: d1b8ecb3e0edab3ac455486802646b930e88677f > @ racket > > Robby Findler > - make tabs the default: 305e32cd2146a761da31c10ca770a3dc52f6ec3e @ drracket > > Ben Greenman > - typ

Re: [racket-dev] If condition optimization

Also: Racket's contract system can help you find inputs that distinguish these functions. Try this out: #lang racket (define (f1 x y) (if (and (zero? x) (= (+ x y) y)) 1 0)) (define (f2 x y) (if (zero? x) 1 0)) (define/contract (same? x y) (-> any/c

Re: [racket-dev] switching to racket7?

I'm excited! On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > >> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> >> I think it's time to swap in the Racket-implemented macro expander, so >> I propose to merge the changes in the `racket7` repo

Re: [racket-dev] DrRacket bug producing incorrect namespace mismatch

This seems to be how you make it happen outside of DrRacket: $ racket -l errortrace -t namespace-mismatch.rkt namespace-mismatch.rkt:11:9: require: namespace mismatch; reference to a module that is not available reference phase: 1 referenced module: 'expanded module referenced phase

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.12

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Robby Findler > - add #:codomain to reduction-relation (9e1d31b8 @ redex) Doesn't seem important enough. Robby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.12

er >> - syntax/parse: add ~undo, #:undo for unwinding effects (f816a8af @ racket) >> - add lazy-require-syntax (8d04bd67 @ racket) >> - syntax/parse: add unwindable state (9be7bf53 @ racket) >> - add pg SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication (436e4707 @ db) >> >> Matt

Re: [racket-dev] http://pkgd.racket-lang.org down?

The Northwestern pkg-build didn't finish yesterday because the timeout for pict3d didn't kick in. I've killed pict3d and hopefully in a few hours the rest will finish and we'll have yesterday's pkg-build on the website. Robby On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Spencer Florence

[racket-dev] Re: Northwestern snapshot builds suspended for now

The machine is back and the builds have completed successfully the last two nights, so I'm writing to let you know that things seem to be back in shape again. Robby On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > At some point last week, th

[racket-dev] Northwestern snapshot builds suspended for now

At some point last week, the machine that makes the various snapshot builds that are here https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/ (and the pkg-build part of that site too) got upset about something. After spending a bunch of time with the machine over the last week unsuccessfully trying to

Re: [racket-dev] #:authentic

d-evt thread)] >>> [dead-evt (thread-dead-evt thread)] >>> [result (sync suspend-evt dead-evt)]) >>> (if (eq? result dead-evt) >>> 0 >>> (add1 (component-2 thread) >>> >>> > (define

Re: [racket-dev] #:authentic

; says, there's no way to get the accessors and mutations by reflection), >>> so there's no way to impersonate the values. In general, it's up to the >>> implementation of a new kind of value to supply impersonator/chaperone >>> support for those values, and implementatio

Re: [racket-dev] #:authentic

Indeed: if we did that, then these structs would be much like cons cells currently are. Robby On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > What if #:authentic (or whatever) were only allowed on immutable > objects and we allowed them

Re: [racket-dev] #:authentic

What if #:authentic (or whatever) were only allowed on immutable objects and we allowed them to be copied? Then contracts could protect them. Robby On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > @ Christos > > #:authentic explicitly introduces a channel of

Re: [racket-dev] meeting notes

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > 4. Nightly Builds vs Alpha vs Beta > >Some of our users asked for more frequent releases, which we >interpreted as the desire to have access to an 'alpha' and 'beta' >version of the software. In

Re: [racket-dev] Re: Switching to discourse.org

Okay, yet another old fart who chimes in here (and look, I am top-posting! ;). I have to say there is something wonderful and amazing about joining into a global conversation centered around a topic that we all enjoy greatly, especially because there aren't enough people within earshot who are

Re: [racket-dev] gen:dict contracts

I think that the contract system has a lot of room for improvement in the dependent contract checking. In particular, if you think about the actual checks that happen for these particular contracts, I think you could believe that they aren't more expensive than the independent variants. Of course,

Re: [racket-dev] Make range cooperate with for loops?

Go for it!! Robby On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alexis King wrote: > A question[1] was asked on Stack Overflow today that used `range` from > racket/list in a for loop, then was baffled as to why it was so slow compared > to a manually written loop using named let.

Re: [racket-dev] pkgs.racket-lang.org not work

I believe that it is being worked on. https://github.com/racket/racket/pull/1542 Robby On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Alexis King wrote: > Yes, something seems to be broken with pkgs.r-l.org right now; I seem > to have the same problem. Someone mentioned they were

Re: [racket-dev] DrRacket takes longer to start up on weekends

I removed it a few minutes after your first message. Robby On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Leif Andersen wrote: > YES, It _IS_ actually significantly slower because of the icon. > > To test this, Ben Greenman and I made a package called: `arsen`. This > package is

Re: [racket-dev] as I lay --cloning

I just don't blow so much away. "git pull --ff-only" and "make" at the top-level seems to be pretty robust. Robby On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwester

Re: [racket-dev] Misuse of terminology in `parser-tools/lex`?

It may be that at the time the parser-tools were developed, we were not yet using a struct for srclocs. I think today we would not do what the parser tools are doing. Robby On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > Forgive the possibly noobish question. > >

Re: [racket-dev] Implementing a spell checker in DrRacket

You are welcome to try it out and improve it! It is pretty bare bones. Robby On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:33 PM wrote: > Leif, Wow, I'm not sure how I missed that it already has the feature :/. > Thanks! > > > On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 2:12:44 PM UTC-7, Leif Andersen

[racket-dev] Boost + ASL 2.0

The racket leadership meets roughly quarterly but not on a set schedule. (We send out a brief minutes of the discussion each time.) And the meeting will probably discuss what we want to do and how to get started so its timing probably won't be exactly what you need anyway. Can you say a few more

Re: [racket-dev] Documentation for 2D Syntax

This is a font problem (the font being used for the "2d" chars isn't the same width as the rest of the fixed width font). I see this in some browsers and not on others, even on the same machine, sadly. Robby On Thursday, November 3, 2016, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > Hi

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.7

I don't think any of the things listed by my name are worth including in the top-level release notes. Robby On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please > mail me new items and/or

Re: [racket-dev] Inside Racket Seminar 5: Robby Findler on Contracts

wrote: > On September 7th at 11am Central time, please join us for the fifth > Inside Racket Seminar where Robby Findler will give us a walk-through > of the Racket's contract system. > > As before, it will be on Google Hangouts on Air with Robby walking > through the code and giving an e

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.6

Can we say in a single line how to get the warnings to show up? Robby On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Vincent St-Amour > wrote: >> >> samth: >> - folding in of the compiler and

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.6

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > Search for your name on the checklist page to find relevant items, reply > when you finish an item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, > if you have any commits that should have been picked,

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.6

I don't think my entries are release-notes worthy. Robby On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please > mail me new items and/or edits. > > Please phrase announcements using

Re: [racket-dev] Merging the `net` and `compiler` repositories back in

Maybe there is a missing "r" in Sam's commandline? Robby On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > >> On May 25, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt >> wrote: >> >> When we split the Racket repository out into many smaller >>

Re: [racket-dev] Performance of Racket in R7RS benchmarks

Can you use use copy-port? Robby On Saturday, May 7, 2016, Alexis King wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain the Racket r7rs package, which as far as I know, has not > gotten much use. Recently, however, someone has put together a set of > R7RS benchmarks and run it against

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.5

I'm done. Robby On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > Checklist items for the v6.5 release > (using the v6.4.90.900 release candidate build) > > Search for your name on the checklist page to find relevant > items. When items are done, either edit the

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.5

ent > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:12:53 -0500, > Robby Findler wrote: > > > > I would replace "in many cases" with "in our gradual typing benchmark" > > or similar. I don't think there has been any careful study of what is > > common TR code

Re: [racket-dev] Could there be a O(1) type-of operator for Racket builtins?

If you want efficient conditionals you probably want a less than-like operator too I guess. On Saturday, March 26, 2016, Alexis King wrote: > Ok, I’m happy to take a crack at it if you think that’s a good approach. > I am quite comfortable with C, but I have basically no

Re: [racket-dev] design issue with define-local-member-name or we need to understand Quine or referential transparency is BS but referentially transparent positions matter

I think it makes sense (and might be implementable) for the error message to say: send: no such method method name: m or suchlike. Robby On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Consider this program (a poem of a real problem I encountered): > >

Re: [racket-dev] errortrace insrumentation (was: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow)

> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:23:01 -0600, > Robby Findler wrote: >> >> Our experience with the source location change suggests that there are >> many places where code is implicitly relying on syntax properties not >> being preserved in byte code. This entire thread is

Re: [racket-dev] errortrace insrumentation (was: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow)

gt;> so it makes more sense to be to leave ephemeral as the default and add >> a non-ephemeral option. >> >> At Sat, 5 Mar 2016 15:25:51 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >> > Is avoiding the change to preserve of all properties a backwards >> > compatibility co

Re: [racket-dev] errortrace insrumentation (was: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow)

gt; that adds 'paren-shape would need to explicitly add the property as > non-ephemeral, otherwise it would revert (in a sense) to the pre-v6.3 > behavior. > > Any opinion on this new option? So far, I like it the best, but I > haven't thought about it as much as the others. > >

Re: [racket-dev] errortrace insrumentation (was: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow)

o it makes more sense to be to leave ephemeral as the default and add > a non-ephemeral option. > > At Sat, 5 Mar 2016 15:25:51 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >> Is avoiding the change to preserve of all properties a backwards >> compatibility concern or a performance one? (I wouldn't ask

Re: [racket-dev] errortrace insrumentation (was: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow)

Is avoiding the change to preserve of all properties a backwards compatibility concern or a performance one? (I wouldn't ask, except there were a surprising number of bugfixes for the source location change.) Robby On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At

Re: [racket-dev] pkg-build.racket-lang.org

I've started another build for the pkgs that build against the snapshots, too. When it is done, the results will be here: http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/pkg-build/ Robby On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Yes, except that it's currently 6:00am MT. >

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.4

I think we might want to add a grain of salt to that part of the announcement. People shouldn't expect radically improved performance for, say, programs using the math library. It gets better in some cases, but I feel like we need something that's a bit more uniformly better before saying too

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.4

For mine: - Redex supports binding specifications; describe which variables bind in which expressions and your metafunctions and reduction relations automatically become scope-sensitive. Thanks to Paul Stansifer for this improvement. - DrRacket's scrolling is faster. Robby On Mon, Jan 25,

Re: [racket-dev] GUI application built with Racket 6.3 is slooooow to start

It looks like there are some changes in the way that the typed/untyped boundaries are (judging from those two last commits). Maybe try running the contract profiler on the startup portion and see if it gives us a lead? Robby On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Alex Harsanyi

Re: [racket-dev] dict performance

Looks like all but about 2x of the overhead is in the dict-update! contract, which is this: (->i ([d (dict-implements/c 'dict-set!)] [k (d) (dict-key-contract d)] [update (d) (-> (dict-value-contract d) (dict-value-contract d))]) ([default (d) (or/c (dict-value-contract

[racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

Well, the current "racket" repo is only a small part of what we distribute. You might try that same thing on the standard distribution. Robby On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Brian Adkins wrote: > On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 7:55:50 AM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: >>

Re: [racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

well. 45k sounds like what I remember for > just the main collects directory. > > Sam > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015, 8:48 AM Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: >> >> I think something is wrong with your command. When I run "find . -na

Re: [racket-dev] sorting with +nan.0 ?

gt; than an ordering unique to Racket. > > Jay > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:56 PM, 'John Clements' via dev-redirect > <d...@plt-scheme.org> wrote: >> >>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 4:39 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> >>> wrote: >>&g

Re: [racket-dev] sorting with +nan.0 ?

It's definitely a mess and a very unfriendly behavior!! Maybe worth a note in teh docs for 'sort'? With the example you posted? Robby On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, 'John Clements' via dev-redirect <d...@plt-scheme.org> wrote: > >> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Ro

Re: [racket-dev] sorting with +nan.0 ?

Unfortunately, nan is defined to not be less than or greater than any number and sorting works only when you supply a transitive predicate and it seems difficult to change either of these things. Robby On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:10 AM, 'John Clements' via dev-redirect

Re: [racket-dev] Error messages need some imrovement

e to the module, "moniker". Here racket does not tell the name or > where the syntax transformer is located, it does not give the module or > line where the expansion occurs. > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: &g

Re: [racket-dev] Error messages need some imrovement

olver > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Greg Hendershott < > greghendersh...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','greghendersh...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Robby Findler >> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu >> <

Re: [racket-dev] Error messages need some imrovement

Hi Thomas: you may wish to use errortrace to get more source locations for error messages. It is enabled by default in DrRacket, but you have to load it explicitly when you are working with the command-line racket. Probably racket-mode has some support for it too, but I'm not sure if it is turned

Re: [racket-dev] colon keywords

gt;> (module+ test >> (require rackunit) >> (define (reads in out) >>(check-equal? (read (open-input-string in)) out)) >> (parameterize ([current-readtable (make-colon-keyword-readtable)]) >>(reads "a:b" 'a:b) >>(reads ":a" '#:a) &

Re: [racket-dev] Installer for current release version and automated testing

If you test against head you will probably get the best warnings. I assume you want to find out about problems before the release goes out, to prepare for the release? (The release branch is a relatively short-lived thing that exists only in the run up to a release.) Robby On Sat, Oct 10, 2015

Re: [racket-dev] Re: module instance static?

The number of times that a phase 1 module is required is not easy to predict because it depends on how the program is run. But yes, state is not shared unless the state is external (network connections, IO (like you see here), files in the file system). Robby On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:46 PM,

Re: [racket-dev] Re: module instance static?

Yes, and mostly we do that at phase 0 (compilation doesn't generally make network connections (although it could)) so we get the help from the runtime system that we discussed earlier. Robby On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Thomas Lynch wrote: > Interesting

Re: [racket-dev] module instance static?

The top-level code in the module runs only once. Here's a small version of your code and the results of running it. ☕ cat A.rkt #lang racket (require "utility.rkt") (printf "A\n") ☕ [robby@gongguan] ~/x ☕ cat B.rkt #lang racket (require "utility.rkt") (printf "B\n") ☕ [robby@gongguan] ~/x ☕

Re: [racket-dev] Package versioning

Maybe the right thing is to just collect the set of licenses of all dependencies of a given pkg as an alternative view of some pkg, and then you could navigate around yourself to make decisions? Robby On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Greg Hendershott wrote: > I think

Re: [racket-dev] Package versioning

I too think it would be fantastic if you took this on. Robby On Tuesday, September 1, 2015, Alexis King wrote: > > Take a bigger stab. Post code. Submit pull requests. > > It’s on my list of Racket projects to work on! ;) My recent updates to my > Heroku buildpack and

Re: [racket-dev] Docs don't mention that DrR auto-runs test submodules?

Yep that is accurate and good suggestions. Thanks! On Friday, August 7, 2015, Benjamin Greenman bl...@cornell.edu wrote: +1 Can we also include a footnote about the menu options Racket Disable Tests and Language Choose Language Submodules to Run? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:14 AM, 'John

Re: [racket-dev] Bulgarian translation of Racket

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Alexander Shopov a...@kambanaria.org wrote: Hi everyone, I am Alexander Shopov and I am announcing that I have started Bulgarian translation of Racket's strings. Bulgarian is a South Slavic language, official in Bulgaria. I have been translating FLOSS for

Re: [racket-dev] make failing due to hash-ref

. Do you have that commit? (After I added that commit, I got an error about a pkg conflict which was the one avoided by deleting compiled/ directories). Robby On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote: If you delete your compiled/ directories and re-run

Re: [racket-dev] try the new macro expander

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: At Sun, 19 Jul 2015 15:46:07 -0700, Alexis King wrote: One more thing: introducing a new scope with make-syntax-introducer seems to break DrRacket’s Check Syntax arrows for the whole module. That makes sense in

Re: [racket-dev] try the new macro expander

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Gustavo Massaccesi gust...@oma.org.ar wrote: Slightly off-topic: I didn't notice 'original-for-check-syntax. A few weeks ago I had problems with a missing arrows in DrRacket, and I searched for 'disappeared-use and I got

Re: [racket-dev] Release Announcement for v6.2

* Added data/enumerate: a library that supports efficient enumeration of data structures * DrRacket's online check syntax works with images and other non-text content * DrRacket's blueboxes are available more often and contain methods and constructor information * DrRacket's Open Require Path

[racket-dev] Re: Pre-Release Checklist for v6.2

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu - DrRacket Tests Done. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Racket Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop