I'm quite new to the world of Racket, and this made for some nice reading!
If I understand it correctly, this will be quite a massive change. I'm sure
a lot of folks, including myself will be happy to pitch in whichever way we
can (documentation, testing, coding, etc.) in this process!
On Wedne
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:03 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:08:38 -0800, Alexis King wrote:
>> I have a question to add, myself: if people such as me are interested in
>> helping with the port, is there anything we can do?
>
> That's a good question, and I don't have a good a
>I'm willing to come to SLC and spend the weekend cleaning your garage if
it would help.
Hahaha!
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+5:30, Matthew Butterick
wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:03 PM, Matthew Flatt > wrote:
>
> At Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:08:38 -0800, Alexis King wrote:
At Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:59:14 -0800, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> Perhaps the more productive form of this question would be "what dumb stuff
> that ordinarily taxes your time can be delegated to others in the Racket
> community, so that you have more time to work on the Flatt-intensive parts of
>
