For those who like to write their racket code in vim, the plugin
https://github.com/wlangstroth/vim-racket is pretty essential.
Unfortunately, it is outdated and many of the new predefined identifiers (e.g.
set-add!) are not highlighted.
I added a few of these in my personal settings, but it
Hi Luke,
This script generates a large list of keywords. It was used to generate the
keywords for the Github highlighter.
https://github.com/soegaard/racket-highlight-for-github/blob/master/generate-keywords.rkt
/Jens Axel
2015-06-01 17:07 GMT+02:00 Luke Miles rashreportl...@gmail.com:
For
The syntax forms should be in the KEYWORDS list; try un-commenting that line.
Some highlighters distinguish keywords and builtins, so Jens'
script generates those separately.
If Vim doesn't care, you could combine them into one big list.
(As my other post says, the distinction is kind of
1. Jens' solution is good. I've used for the Pygments highlighter and
for racket-mode. I recommend it! You may want to stop reading now. :)
2. Coincidentally very recently I've been taking a fresh look at this
for racket-mode. I think a recent commit message sums it up pretty
well:
Thank you very much, Jens. This appears to be all the functions. Do you know of
anything for special forms? This would include for, for/and, define-values,
etc...
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 11:09:31 AM UTC-4, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
Hi Luke,
This script generates a large list of
Hello,
I try to find a easy way to append a data into a list-box% object.
For example, I have 3 columns called (c1 c2 c3), and I want to add
a row like (val1 val2 val3).
Append method is nice, but only append data on the first column... :p
On 2015-06-01 12:50:33 -0700, 'John Clements' via users-redirect wrote:
Contract error: expected “text.rkt”, got #ClassInfo
from contract on gather-grades, with contract (“text.rkt” - boolean?)
… In other words, the “ClassInfo?” predicate had mysteriously been replaced
by one that checked
I just got an interesting and very scary contract error. I tried to reproduce
it, but I can’t quite do it. I think I can see (part of) what’s going on,
though.
Suppose I have a file called bad1.rkt that is in Typed Racket (I’m guessing
this is significant) and exports a structure called
I think that if you don't have up to date .zo files, arbitrary badness
can ensue.
Robby
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2015-06-01 12:50:33 -0700, 'John Clements' via users-redirect wrote:
Contract error: expected “text.rkt”, got #ClassInfo
from
On Jun 1, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I think that if you don't have up to date .zo files, arbitrary badness
can ensue.
Just to check my development model; generally, when I’m working on multiple
interdependent libraries in a collection, my experience
I am working on a little project to remotely drive a VR headset with code
written in Racket as an attempt to make a significantly faster development
environment for certain types of VR apps. I am worried about what appears to
be the compile speed.
It takes over three seconds from hitting
Unfortunately, Typed Racket typechecking is pretty slow, and so the
times you have there are not out of the ordinary. The most significant
thing that's slow in Typed Racket is type checking numeric operations,
because both the numbers themselves and the operations have
complicated types.
If you
I've increasingly been using TR this way (= keeping code in a state where it
can be easily toggled between typechecked and not). It works, though I'm still
thinking about how to achieve better ergonomics with these issues, which don't
have automatic solutions:
Q1. How to toggle between `#lang
Is there an option to parse all the type annotations, but not do any of the
checking? Highly interactive tuning sessions could work without type checking,
then turn it back on for structural work.
On Jun 1, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote:
Unfortunately,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:06:34AM +, John Carmack wrote:
Does Run from DrRacket have a significant time penalty?
By default, DrRacket has debugging instrumentation enabled, which can
significantly slow down programs that you may expect to run fast.
Disabling these will speed things up for
My mistake! Do you have the same issues if you run program/compile from
the command line with just `racket`?
--
William J. Bowman
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:17:45AM +, John Carmack wrote:
I meant time-to-compile penalty, not execution speed. None of those options
seem to make much
There is a `#lang typed/racket/base/no-check`
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:34 PM John Carmack jo...@oculus.com wrote:
Is there an option to parse all the type annotations, but not do any of
the checking? Highly interactive tuning sessions could work without type
checking, then turn it back on for
Yes, if you just change `#lang typed/racket/base` to `#lang
typed/racket/base/no-check`, that's what you'll get.
Sam
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:34 PM, John Carmack jo...@oculus.com wrote:
Is there an option to parse all the type annotations, but not do any of the
checking? Highly interactive
18 matches
Mail list logo
