On 26/11/2017 16:42, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
I know two big reasons for using a complex tool is it’s stickiness
factors; normally a combination of familiarity (hence speed) with a lot
of powerful features and non-transportable customisation.
A third big reason is generality. The main reas
My guess is that "(define" does something special to figure out where to
insert newlines in the rendered document.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Jos Koot wrote:
> My code:
>
> #lang scribble/manual
>
> @(require
> scribble/core
> scribble/eval
> racket
> (for-label racket)
> (for-sy
What you describe is indeed different from what I experience and I followed
the exact same steps that you listed. It may perhaps be due to something
that is different in my system settings. It is also strange because the
behavior that you describe with the dialog box is also what I experience
w
Returning to this after a long delay...
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:34:05PM -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> > (Context: I only actually intend to use `store' with a single type, but I
> > want to define that type in a separate module. Since the type's definition
> > refers to `addr', I made `s
> On Nov 26, 2017, at 11:27 AM, 'Royall Spence' via users-redirect
> wrote:
>
> DrRacket actually does the things it claims to do and isn't a broken mess.
Yes, it is an amazing tool. I occasionally escape to Emacs for tasks that I
can’t do easily in Dr (e.g. rectangular editing) but never f
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 03:42:14PM +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve noticed some list members use other editors or IDE’s.
>
> I know two big reasons for using a complex tool is it’s stickiness factors;
> normally a combination of familiarity (hence speed) with a lot of powerful
> f
I use Neovim and I'm working on a Racket client for it:
https://gitlab.com/HiPhish/neovim.rkt
One of the cool features Neovim has over Vim is that it provides an API for
remote processes; a client application can connect to the editor and they
can communicate with each other. What that means in
Hi Stephen,
> I’ve noticed some list members use other editors or IDE’s.
>
> I know two big reasons for using a complex tool is it’s stickiness factors;
> normally a combination of familiarity (hence speed) with a lot of powerful
> features and non-transportable customisation.
>
> Putting sticki
acket/base` (or whatever Scheme-like lang), so, when
reading code, you know whether some identifier you don't recognize JUST
CHANGED ALL THE RULES. See black bold variable names in screenshot:
http://www.neilvandyke.org/temporary/20171126-quack.png
* Visually distinguish identifiers that
One thing I appreciate about racket-mode in emacs is the more
detailed syntax highlighting. I've attached two screenshots of the
same code in emacs and DrRacket. I think what's happening here is
that racket-mode highlights `for-clause` names and function
applications (sometimes?) while DrRacket doe
Hi,
I’ve noticed some list members use other editors or IDE’s.
I know two big reasons for using a complex tool is it’s stickiness factors;
normally a combination of familiarity (hence speed) with a lot of powerful
features and non-transportable customisation.
Putting stickiness factors aside, wh
11 matches
Mail list logo