Re: [racket-users] Adding interactive overlays to racket plots

Hi Matthias, I updated the plot package to cover all the cases I had in mind for plot overlays and also updated my application to make use of these features, just to make sure that they are adequate. The pull request is here: https://github.com/racket/plot/pull/32, it would be good if I

Re: [racket-users] Quick regexp question

It is nice. I'll have to play with this as well. Thanks again everyone. On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 5:49:15 PM UTC-6, johnbclements wrote: > > > > > On Feb 2, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Butterick > wrote: > > > > > >> On Feb 2, 2018, at 10:23 AM, 'John Clements' via

Re: [racket-users] Quick regexp question

> On Feb 2, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > > >> On Feb 2, 2018, at 10:23 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users >> wrote: >> >> This macro gets the names in much closer to the corresponding patterns than >> matching by index, but

Re: [racket-users] How to integrate Racket with a .Net application?

For the people not following my bug tracker: I fixed it now. On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 2:44:25 PM UTC+1, berthold.baeuml wrote: > > https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/msgpack is a nice package to use. > Thank you for providing it. But there is a bug for sequence lengths >15 > and <255.

Re: [racket-users] Quick regexp question

> On Feb 2, 2018, at 10:23 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users > wrote: > > This macro gets the names in much closer to the corresponding patterns than > matching by index, but it doesn’t actually embed the names into the regexp. If you like keeping the names

Re: [racket-users] How do I increase memory for Racket?

Brilliant. Thanks, Matthew. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:08:39 -0500, David Storrs wrote: > > I've got some tests that are crashing due to running out of memory. I > > would rather not pull aside to track down the issue,

Re: [racket-users] Quick regexp question

In the long run this is probably better than what I wanted. Thank you On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, johnbclements wrote: > > Not sure if this gets you as far as you want, but you could use a macro to > associate names with paren-wrapped items: > > #lang racket > >

Re: [racket-users] Quick regexp question

Not sure if this gets you as far as you want, but you could use a macro to associate names with paren-wrapped items: #lang racket (define-syntax re-match (syntax-rules () [(_ str re name ...) (match str [(regexp re (list _ name ...)) (list (list (quote name) name)

[racket-users] Quick regexp question

Sorry if I've missed this in the documentation, but I don't see it, and it is starting to bother me. In Powershell. Python, and Splunk I'm able to perform automatic field extraction on strings and access the values of fields by name. Is there a way to do this in Racket? Of course, pairing

Re: [racket-users] Building GUI launcher icons with raco setup

At Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:44:44 -0600, Philip McGrath wrote: > The package includes a module that programmatically generates the icons for > the GUI launcher at the expected paths ("my-application.png" and so forth). > I would like to have raco setup run this code before it builds the > launcher, but

Re: [racket-users] raco distribute help

At Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:53:50 -0500, Deren Dohoda wrote: > tl;dr main.rkt has to (dynamic-require user-selected.rkt) and > user-selected.rkt is written in a different #lang and requires a file from > this program. How do I glue these pieces together for raco exe / raco > distribute? You'll need to

Re: [racket-users] How do I increase memory for Racket?

At Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:08:39 -0500, David Storrs wrote: > I've got some tests that are crashing due to running out of memory. I > would rather not pull aside to track down the issue, preferring instead to > get the functionality working now and solve the memory problem later. > Regardless, Racket

[racket-users] How do I increase memory for Racket?

I've got some tests that are crashing due to running out of memory. I would rather not pull aside to track down the issue, preferring instead to get the functionality working now and solve the memory problem later. Regardless, Racket is only getting 128MB, which seems pretty anemic. I've checked

Re: [racket-users] How to integrate Racket with a .Net application?

https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/msgpack is a nice package to use. Thank you for providing it. But there is a bug for sequence lengths >15 and <255. I filed an issue at https://gitlab.com/HiPhish/MsgPack.rkt/issues/4 Berthold > On 2. Feb 2018, at 01:04, HiPhish