Re: [racket-users] Clarify project policy on racket2 syntax

Thank you for your answer. I wait then to see. >Honu Yes, documentation is really lacking. воскресенье, 11 августа 2019 г., 23:19:06 UTC+3 пользователь Neil Van Dyke написал: > > Atlas, I get the impression, from the impassioned discussion thus far, > that a lot of the community really wants a

Re: [racket-users] Clarify project policy on racket2 syntax

My question was not about backwards compatibility, but about adopting new default syntax. For me it is as good as dropping s-expressions because only default\main syntax is what really mater for me. Sorry for not expressing myself clearly enough. воскресенье, 11 августа 2019 г., 21:47:20 UTC+3 п

Re: [racket-users] Clarify project policy on racket2 syntax

. воскресенье, 11 августа 2019 г., 17:58:29 UTC+3 пользователь Manfred Lotz написал: > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 07:51:53 -0700 (PDT) > Atlas Atlas > wrote: > > > I don't known how racket is managed. Can someone clarify for me the > > future of Racket. > > &

[racket-users] Clarify project policy on racket2 syntax

I don't known how racket is managed. Can someone clarify for me the future of Racket. Is abandoning s-expressions is sealed decision? What chances that this will happen? 10% 50% 80% 100%? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

вторник, 30 июля 2019 г., 4:40:40 UTC+3 пользователь Sam Tobin-Hochstadt написал: > > I'm not exactly sure what you're asking for here -- the CL type system > works very differently -- but local annotation is certainly possible > in Typed Racket. The `ann` form allows you to annotate any expres

[racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

tween functions and data. понедельник, 29 июля 2019 г., 1:53:18 UTC+3 пользователь Atlas Atlas написал: > > Found this interesting video on GopherCon > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps3mBPcjySE > <https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPs3mBP

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

пятница, 26 июля 2019 г., 23:35:45 UTC+3 пользователь Hendrik Boom написал: > > One of the great things about Idris is its dependent types, and the > way they can be used for (constructive) formal logic. I was > experimenting with them in the 80's. > > To make them into a secure logic, however

[racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

Found this interesting video on GopherCon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps3mBPcjySE Speaker raises questions about what a program code is and how it should look -- You received this message because

[racket-users] Re: Racket2 on a ubiquitous platform [was the case, and a proposal, for elegant syntax in #lang racket2]

четверг, 25 июля 2019 г., 22:03:15 UTC+3 пользователь stewart mackenzie написал: > If you want to Racket2 popular make it easy for users to get the > programmer's responsive applications and programmers will come in > droves. Drop Chez, reimplement the Racket interpreter in Rust and > target i

Re: [racket-users] on reducing barriers in the Racket community

If we want more women, or any other group of people, involved in Racket, the only way to achieve this is to explain to this groups of people why do they need Racket. *(And openness and honesty is a great way to do it)* And try to answer this question for ourselves. What Racket can offer to this

Re: [racket-users] on reducing barriers in the Racket community

1 UTC+3 пользователь Atlas Atlas написал: > > I never said that lowering barriers is lying or insulting. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

Re: [racket-users] on reducing barriers in the Racket community

on the value of education. But the idea > that lowering barriers is equivalent to "ruining community", "lying to > people", and "insult[ing] people who are already in the project" — no, I > don't agree, and those ideas are inconsistent with everything

Re: [racket-users] on reducing barriers in the Racket community

1. To increase inclusiveness of some group of people, you educate people from this group on the subject of lisp racket computer science etc. 2. By lowering "barriers" you just welcome someone who doesn't care for the project and ruining community from inside. 3. By making a show about what projec

Re: [racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

Prefix notation is good. What makes difficulties is mixed notations. There how it looks: (Math.Sin(1\(1 + Math.Exp(x * -1))) - Math.Pow((1\Math.Log(x - (r * -1))), 3)) \ Math.Sqrt(Math.Pow(x + r, 2)) Add to this functions with more then 2 arguments. Add to this iterations, and it will be complete

[racket-users] Re: Racket2 possibilities

My personal big wish is "standard library" consistency and futures(like more extended date-time functions). Another big wish is typed system. Typed racket looks like a BIG step forward, and gives real benefits, it is shame it have not so much support. Another wish is more fluid transition betwe