On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:38:49 +0200, Dexter Lagan
wrote:
>Thanks so much for your reply, it's very nice to see another perspective. I
>added specific comments below :
>
>They say that Racket is slow. I would like to know who are "they".
>>
>
> Same here, never had a problem, but I do understand
Hello everyone and thank you for this very interesting discussion!
I'd like to share my opinion on parenthesized prefix syntax: I actually
switched to Racket/Lisp because of it! This highly uniform structure best
fits the shape of mind as of today.
Now, I explicitly don't pretend to be
First of all, Thank you to the team for making such a fantastic system
available for the rest of us. I don't know what I'd have done without it.
As a very long time Schemer/Racketeer/Lisper and a consistent industry
practitioner (I have used Chez Scheme and Racket as critical parts of every
As a newcomer from industry, I would like to share some of my thoughts.
First, about the syntax.
I suggest you to watch this video. This guy talks about the approaches
Wolfram Language takes to solve this problem. By stacking up different
layer of syntax like FullForm, InputForm for different
One part of me thinks of glorious success of Perl 6 and the rapid
conversion to Python 3.x from Python 2.x ...
... the other part says, "Racket is your research project, you do what you
want to do."
Good Luck and have Fun!
Chris
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
5 matches
Mail list logo
