Re: [racket-users] Re: Signal handling (or alternative)

2018-11-30 Thread Brian Adkins
Awesome - thanks! I wonder if using serve, instead of serve/servlet, may also avoid the extra functionality described in "Stateless Servlets" that I mentioned in another thread here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/racket-users/fc0mRI-empE On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:57:00 PM UTC-

Re: [racket-users] Re: Signal handling (or alternative)

2018-11-30 Thread Bogdan Popa
Brian Adkins writes: > I just did a quick test, and "kill " will stop the Racket web server, > but not gracefully. In other words, it doesn't allow the current request to > finish. Maybe another signal will gracefully stop it? I personally run the server with serve[1] which runs it in a backgro

[racket-users] Re: Signal handling (or alternative)

2018-11-30 Thread Brian Adkins
I just did a quick test, and "kill " will stop the Racket web server, but not gracefully. In other words, it doesn't allow the current request to finish. Maybe another signal will gracefully stop it? On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:36:04 PM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: > > The Unicorn app server