Regarding the discussion of tests expected to fail, and moving
expected-fail tests to different directories, I wonder whether you'd
prefer using an expected-fail annotation per test case.
An annotation seems useful for my own work, and lightweight, but I don't
know about core Racket (especiall
Section 1.1 mentions PLT. Is this obsolete? It is at least confusing
or someone who does not know Racket history.
Section 2.2 Always Test
It should mention that when you formulate a test you should test the
test *before* you modify the code. At present the warning about an
inadequate test
2 matches
Mail list logo
