[racket-users] Racket and FastCGI

, the problem seems pervasive and I think I can help. Sincerely, Lux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Racket Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [racket-users] Racket and FastCGI

If you want to use SCGI instead of FastCGI: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-scgi/ I am trying with lighttpd. I placed the following example on /home/lux/served/scgi-test/scgi.rtk: -- #lang racket (require (planet neil/scgi:2:3

Re: [racket-users] Racket and FastCGI

development efforts (so I can use it) but in the end I've come up with a custom doc generator due to weird particular requirements. Let me organize one ad-hoc workspace on my computer to efficiently work on this subjects and I will try. Lux Absolutely! We would welcome additional examples

Re: [racket-users] How to find most efficient constructs/instructions beside benchmarking?

For future reference for who will read this topic: This announcement on sqlite mailinglist seems to at least partially prove my point for usefulness of micro-optimization, something valuable to research from my point of view. 50% faster than 3.7.17 This is 50% faster at the low-level grunt

Re: [racket-users] How to find most efficient constructs/instructions beside benchmarking?

You almost never have to worry about the efficiency of (second x) (cadr x) and (car (cdr x)). There are always bigger fish to fry than that. Sure enough, but what if this simple operation is repeated one billion times? There will be differences? It can be easily measured, by

[racket-users] How to find most efficient constructs/instructions beside benchmarking?

abstractions/helpers (in Racket) based on them that can be reimplemented easily without requiring libraries like racket/list in addition lo save memory and load times? I know readable code is generally better, but how can I save some fractions of seconds here and there changing my constructs? Lux -- You

Re: [racket-users] advice for writing desktop app

Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas. https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table Thanks, I've searched something like this for several days, starred. Maybe would be a good idea

Re: [racket-users] Dozens and dozens of interdependent modules, better to use include?

I am sorry, I've not explained well my intents. My actual situation is like this: I have a main.rkt file which require the most of all other modules, and it is the entry point of the application, it provide access to almost all procedures contained in the required modules. Modules are abundant

Re: [racket-users] Dozens and dozens of interdependent modules, better to use include?

Thanks, I'm studying units, at this time they do not seems to be particularly helpful to entangle this mess (seems like more work, not less), but I need to deepen my understanding... Other suggestions will be appreciated as well, in the meantime! If the issue you're facing is mutual

[racket-users] Way to open DrRacket at a specific file line?

As much as I love vim/gvim and configured it to do anything I want, I can not code anymore without DrRacket. Something I miss is the ability to open a file (in an existing istance) in a tab at specific line number (bonus points if also column). Tried searching around with no success... Any

Re: [racket-users] Way to open DrRacket at a specific file line?

Do you mean opening the file from a menu within DrRacket or from the outside, like from the command line? Hi Laurent, thanks for your answer. Yes, I mean from the command line (more specifically I need it to be launched as a system command, which is almost the same). I am on Linux but I

Re: [racket-users] Way to open DrRacket at a specific file line?

I see it is possible to do now, but require some not negligible amount of work, at least at this time for me... Thanks for the informations. I will continue to search for an hack on background, nonetheless... I will let you all know if I find something. Ok. Some elements of answer: - DrRacket

[racket-users] Dozens and dozens of interdependent modules, better to use include?

Racket module system is very efficient, but it wont be more efficient in the particular situation of dozens (and counting...) of highly interdependent modules, every one containing a big number of functions to just include all in a single namespace? I can think of various shortcomings (like

Re: [racket-users] Way to open DrRacket at a specific file line?

OFF-TOPIC: I feel like I can do anything, because of this I can not thank you and all others for your work enough. Just to let you know my feelings and appreciation. +1 I know DrRacket has some downsides, but I sure wish many more people would see the light, use it, and help identify and

[racket-users] Re: Big thanks for the Racket Plot design

I also like to thank you all for the same things (and all the rest). I see a big future for Racket unfolding more and more everyday. Lux > since complaints about bugs are probably more common than compliments about > smooth experiences, I just wanted to say thank you to whomever de

[racket-users] Best to ask here or on Stackoverflow from a language promotion perspective?

I have several questions about Racket and DrRacket to ask in the next days. I have a feeling if I ask them on Stackoverflow.com it can be a minuscule contribution to its promotion as a language (spreading the word), and I can accept to receive less answers there. It can contribute also to the

[racket-users] Memory comsuption reduced using `(require (only-in aModule aFunction anotherFunction))`?

Hi, I use `(require (only-in aModule aFunction anotherFunction))` a lot to make use of modules safer, but it also can lead to reduced memory consumption not loading the module on its entirety? Or this is not the case? What tools I can use to evaluate this myself on the linux platform? Thanks in

Re: [racket-users] Memory comsuption reduced using `(require (only-in aModule aFunction anotherFunction))`?

I see, I've tried `raco demod` and I am pretty happy with it. Thanks for answering. On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 3:31:01 PM UTC+2, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Restricting imports in that way is unlikely to reduce memory > consumption. A module will be loaded if it is transitively required > from the

[racket-users] Re: HtDP 2e

Thanks for the book, I've read the first and started the second edition recently. It is great. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to