Hi Cam,
On 10/11/2018 8:21 AM, Cam wrote:
For some reason, I had the impression (not at all backed up by any of the
documentation, in
any of the documentation, in retrospect) that the code would be automatically
transmitted over
the network to the remote node.
Thanks, George.
Glad it's work
George Neuner writes:
> Hi Cam,
>
> On 10/10/2018 5:03 PM, Cam wrote:
>> I took a packet capture and the only interesting thing I was able to
>> find in it was a conversation like this:
>>
>> localmachine->remotemachine:
>> > #s(dcgm 11 -1 -1 "")#s(dcgm 9 -1 (dynamic-place
>> > #"/home/cam/tmp/r
Hi Cam,
On 10/10/2018 5:03 PM, Cam wrote:
I took a packet capture and the only interesting thing I was able to
find in it was a conversation like this:
localmachine->remotemachine:
> #s(dcgm 11 -1 -1 "")#s(dcgm 9 -1 (dynamic-place
#"/home/cam/tmp/racket-distributed-places-test/my-worker.rkt" m
Cam writes:
> I have these two files:
>
> my-test.rkt:
>> #lang racket
>>
>> (require racket/place/distributed
>> racket/runtime-path
>> "my-worker.rkt")
>>
>> (define-runtime-path worker-path "my-worker.rkt")
>>
>> (define remote-node (spawn-remote-racket-node
>>
4 matches
Mail list logo
