Re: [racket-users] Showing off Goblins' time-traveling-debugging support in Terminal Phase
And then I just noticed you had sent such an email immediately after ;) Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > I'm definitely interested in reactive patterns, so please give me a > heads up with whatever you have whenever :) > > Sage Gerard writes: > >> Nice, I'll actually be competing with a flavor of MaiaVictor's library >> for reactive models. Time travel is a great add! >> >> Original Message >> On Jan 26, 2020, 3:07 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: >> >>> Not the most interesting part of Spritely Goblins (that is in the >>> async/distributed stuff, to-be-demo'ed), but something I wrote about >>> recently and maybe I should link here too: >>> >>> https://dustycloud.org/blog/goblins-time-travel-micropreview/ >>> >>> Of course, as functional programmers, time-travel isn't that novel. >>> What's more interesting is how to make it comfortable* when we have many >>> independently acting objects. >>> >>> More to come later. >>> >>> - Chris >>> >>> * Without introducing the m-word** (which isn't very comfortable for >>> many) >>> >>> ** monad*** >>> >>> *** one could argue that Goblins kind of can be perceived of as an >>> implicit monad but the important thing is that this framing is not >>> exposed to users >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Racket Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87o8uq2d7s.fsf%40dustycloud.org. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87k15c3k1b.fsf%40dustycloud.org.
Re: [racket-users] Showing off Goblins' time-traveling-debugging support in Terminal Phase
I'm definitely interested in reactive patterns, so please give me a heads up with whatever you have whenever :) Sage Gerard writes: > Nice, I'll actually be competing with a flavor of MaiaVictor's library > for reactive models. Time travel is a great add! > > Original Message > On Jan 26, 2020, 3:07 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > >> Not the most interesting part of Spritely Goblins (that is in the >> async/distributed stuff, to-be-demo'ed), but something I wrote about >> recently and maybe I should link here too: >> >> https://dustycloud.org/blog/goblins-time-travel-micropreview/ >> >> Of course, as functional programmers, time-travel isn't that novel. >> What's more interesting is how to make it comfortable* when we have many >> independently acting objects. >> >> More to come later. >> >> - Chris >> >> * Without introducing the m-word** (which isn't very comfortable for >> many) >> >> ** monad*** >> >> *** one could argue that Goblins kind of can be perceived of as an >> implicit monad but the important thing is that this framing is not >> exposed to users >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87o8uq2d7s.fsf%40dustycloud.org. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87lfps3k2b.fsf%40dustycloud.org.
Re: [racket-users] Showing off Goblins' time-traveling-debugging support in Terminal Phase
Nice, I'll actually be competing with a flavor of MaiaVictor's library for reactive models. Time travel is a great add! Original Message On Jan 26, 2020, 3:07 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > Not the most interesting part of Spritely Goblins (that is in the > async/distributed stuff, to-be-demo'ed), but something I wrote about > recently and maybe I should link here too: > > https://dustycloud.org/blog/goblins-time-travel-micropreview/ > > Of course, as functional programmers, time-travel isn't that novel. > What's more interesting is how to make it comfortable* when we have many > independently acting objects. > > More to come later. > > - Chris > > * Without introducing the m-word** (which isn't very comfortable for > many) > > ** monad*** > > *** one could argue that Goblins kind of can be perceived of as an > implicit monad but the important thing is that this framing is not > exposed to users > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87o8uq2d7s.fsf%40dustycloud.org. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/f4ncHKjV3F9EQ07Xp5zz-HL_cZqmv_t-c5ayjgblvT7aaNa5ya8rRkwck7oOtLVuPxUWjcIKE1VAXyU7oZTWCzpNtjsDIMVo8_rWnxKx65w%3D%40sagegerard.com.
[racket-users] Showing off Goblins' time-traveling-debugging support in Terminal Phase
Not the most interesting part of Spritely Goblins (that is in the async/distributed stuff, to-be-demo'ed), but something I wrote about recently and maybe I should link here too: https://dustycloud.org/blog/goblins-time-travel-micropreview/ Of course, as functional programmers, time-travel isn't that novel. What's more interesting is how to make it comfortable* when we have many independently acting objects. More to come later. - Chris * Without introducing the m-word** (which isn't very comfortable for many) ** monad*** *** one could argue that Goblins kind of can be perceived of as an implicit monad but the important thing is that this framing is not exposed to users -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87o8uq2d7s.fsf%40dustycloud.org.
