Yes, @index
I learned about it to put "powerset" to the docs, and always go back
to that example when something like this comes up:
https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/pairs.scrbl#L1333
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Do we have an existing doc redirect mechanism? I’ve just spent five minutes
looking at docs for defproc and the “Indexing” section, and didn’t find
anything. Doesn’t mean it’s not there, but I did have a look. Then again, this
thread is a living testament to my inability to find things in
Could we add a macro to allow defining alias names? Could call it
`set!-set-subset?`.
And probably want a way to see all such aliases:
`get-set!-set-subset?-set-subs`.
p.s. In all seriousness, the doc redirect is a great idea.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
How about a pull request that redirects searches for "set-subset?" to
the `subset?` function?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I am so glad that I'm not the only one who does this.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:16 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> D’oh! It’s just called subset?
>
> Sorry,
>
> John
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:16 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
>
D’oh! It’s just called subset?
Sorry,
John
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:16 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> It seems strange to me that we have (AFAICT) set-union, set-subtract, and
> set-member?, but not set-subset?. Would it make sense for me to propose a
> pull request for
It seems strange to me that we have (AFAICT) set-union, set-subtract, and
set-member?, but not set-subset?. Would it make sense for me to propose a pull
request for this? (it would just be (set-empty? (set-subtract b a)), I realize…)
John
--
You received this message because you are
7 matches
Mail list logo
