Hi Andre,
I wouldn't use the Jargon branch, it is very old and missing a lot of
the ffunctionality of the current branch. Plus the current version has
had ALL the views rewritten. I have been wanting to start work on it
again, but simply don't have time at the moment. The original
I would love to help with translating the views. I'm just not
experienced enough yet to mess with the core. So if most of
functionality is working I can help converting the views.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Keith Bingman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andre,
I wouldn't use the Jargon branch,
I note there is now a fix for the Rails security issue that was
announced earlier this year.
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2008/08/23/dos-vulnerability-in-rexml/
I know the early patches broke radiant so I wanted to check if anyone
found any problem with this fix in relation to radiant or has
I will be defining more details today. Have patience, my children! ;)
Sean
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Christopher Dwan wrote:
Before this gets under way, would it make sense for someone to define
some standards/ conventions for building the templates?
It would be great if the templates that come
That's already been added to edge, and will be included in the next
release. Actually we may upgrade to Rails 2.1.1, which has the fix
included.
Sean
Sharon Clift wrote:
I note there is now a fix for the Rails security issue that was
announced earlier this year.
In which case, I must stress right now that if its templates of the
second definition (site templates), then we really really need a
volunteer to document how to add a site template to a Radiant install.
Perhaps, we just need to extract carefully from the rake db:bootstrap
but we'll need to
