So I went and solved my own problem by modifying things
(http://github.com/adsmart/radiant-directory-mailer-extension) and it
turns out that it was a very simply addition.
Simply change recipients to directory in you mailer part and add
recipients_field. The value of the recipients field is now a
John Muhl and Stephen Southard--
Just wanted to publicly thank both of you for your wonderful work on
the wiki. It's needed a little gardening for a long while now. Thanks
for pulling out the weeds. I feel much better about how everything is
organized now and the move to GitHub was the righ
Sean Cribbs wrote:
Do you have to do anything special to make this happen? I installed
the RedCloth 4 extension to avoid using v3.0.4 that it looks like
Radiant uses by default. Are you saying that Radiant should
automatically use my gem by default?
You no longer need to install that extension.
Do you have to do anything special to make this happen? I installed
the RedCloth 4 extension to avoid using v3.0.4 that it looks like
Radiant uses by default. Are you saying that Radiant should
automatically use my gem by default?
You no longer need to install that extension. Radiant will now
Jason Garber wrote:
Nate, I didn't really follow you. Can you have another go at it?
Sure. It was late when I posted. When I upgraded to 0.7.1 I noticed that
I was getting extra line breaks () between lines, even though the
exact same stylesheet was used and nothing else in the conten had
cha
Jason,
Please do submit that - it would be great to be compliant with the
Textile spec OOB.
As an aside, last weekend I was working with Chef (which uses Merb) and
somehow when I updated the gems, it would install the wrong versions of
certain Merb gems, causing version mismatches and gem ac
Nate, I didn't really follow you. Can you have another go at it?
Radiant 0.6.9 locked you into using RedCloth 3.0.4 for Textile, which
was released in September of 2005. 0.7.1 lets you use RedCloth from
gems, so you can get the latest RedCloth—4.1.9 which is much better.
It handles HTML
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:26 PM, John W. Long wrote:
> Its just another thing to maintain. One of the chief advantages of migrating
> stuff over to github is that upgrades and maintenance are free.
I'd say that Redmine does more than github but I can also understand your point.
--
Ollivier Rober
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:21 PM, N. Turnage wrote:
> It looks like some of the projects they mention as success stories have
> themselves moved their wikis to git (e.g. Typo).
I know about typo and talked to Frédéric about it but they were using
an old version of Redmine.
--
Ollivier Robert -
__
