Re: [Radiant] r:find question

2008-12-03 Thread John W. Long
On Dec 3, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote: YAY! Someone who agrees with me! The caveat, of course, is that often you need to put Radius tags inside the attributes of HTML tags. But that's because Radius is not strict XML, but interpolated. When explaining Radius to a local web

Re: [Radiant] r:find question

2008-12-03 Thread Chris Parrish
Actually, I should probably clarify. I agree that IF you are going to use an XML paradigm, better to leave it be. That said as Radiant's been growing in popularity, I've been seeing more and more people hitting a wall here. I'm starting to wonder whether using an XML paradigm is really

Re: [Radiant] r:find question

2008-12-03 Thread Adam van den Hoven
I don't think that the issue at hand is the average user who is going to be hacking with the source code. They don't exist. You start hacking with source code and you need to be at a higher level of expertise. JSTL and JSP EL handle this more elegantly (how much more is a matter of

Re: [Radiant] r:find question

2008-12-02 Thread Chris Parrish
Joe. I assume that you are using Manuel Meurer's Parameterized-Snippets from the syntax (as opposed to my Variables extension) to do this. Neither of our tools (or any radius tags, for that matter) allow this kind of nested parsing out of the box. I believe that Manuel modified Radius to do

Re: [Radiant] r:find question

2008-12-02 Thread Joe Van Dyk
I think that's what I'm looking for. Any chance that could be merged into radiant core? On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Parrish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe. I assume that you are using Manuel Meurer's Parameterized-Snippets from the syntax (as opposed to my Variables extension) to do