Re: [Radiant] Re: [ANN] Summer Reboot Documentation

2008-07-24 Thread Mohit Sindhwani
Zaheed Haque wrote: Mohit: I looked at the existing documentation! Great work. I am willing to fund some of the activity if that will speed up things. I have a need of such documentation in September. Feel free to contact if you are interested. Cheers Zaheed Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Zahe

[Radiant] Re: [ANN] Summer Reboot Documentation

2008-07-24 Thread Zaheed Haque
Mohit: I looked at the existing documentation! Great work. I am willing to fund some of the activity if that will speed up things. I have a need of such documentation in September. Feel free to contact if you are interested. Cheers Zaheed Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Posted via http://www.ruby-for

[Radiant] Need Radiant Consultants

2008-07-24 Thread Zaheed Haque
Hello: I am looking for experienced radiant developer for building extensions. I would appreciate if you could send me some information about your day rate, reference and availability directly to me. We need to build 2 extension. I look forward to hear from you. Regards Zaheed Haque [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Radiant] SnS extension problem

2008-07-24 Thread Marshal Linfoot
LiteSpeed has a log with optional debug output but it's mostly server state information (ie. processes starting/stopping). I couldn't find anything useful. I discovered a nifty FF add-on called Live HTTP Headers, though. Here's what it shows for the production site using the old-fashioned way of i

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Chris Parrish
I saw somewhere that Luis Lavena was researching porting rDiscount to Windows but also that it didn't look good (discount depends on some *nix only libraries, I think) Hopefully I'm wrong, though. Either way, I didn't mean to hijack a thread. New Redcloth for all! -Chris john muhl wrote:

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread john muhl
On 2008/07/24, at 07:44, Sean Cribbs wrote: How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)? I think it's going to have to happen at some point unless Radiant wants to keep using the same old text parsing libraries from 2004/2005.

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Sean Cribbs
That was my main concern... I'd like to continue packaging the library with Radiant, but it is no longer pure-Ruby and must be compiled. That said, RubyGems has greatly improved since we started down this road. Sean Jim Gay wrote: It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward share

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Chris Parrish
I understood discoount to be *nix only (no Windows). I'll have to look into it further. -Chris Jim Gay wrote: It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting. John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a better Markdown parser). http://github.com/

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Jim Gay
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting. John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a better Markdown parser). http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant/tree/markdown On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Chris Parrish wrote: I'm fine with it. Looks like

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Sean Cribbs
Someone was working on a branch that uses rdiscount, an improved Markdown parser. Sean Chris Parrish wrote: I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too. Now all we need is a better Markdown parser. -Chris Sean Cribbs wrote: How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Chris Parrish
I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too. Now all we need is a better Markdown parser. -Chris Sean Cribbs wrote: How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)? Sean Ollivier Robert wrote: Have you seen this announceme

Re: [Radiant] Forum extension?

2008-07-24 Thread Tim Gossett
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Casper Fabricius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I remember the other reason I never got around to making the Beast > extension ready for public use. I wrote it for a community site, and I put > most of the user stuff and all the login/session stuff in another ex

Re: [Radiant] SnS extension problem

2008-07-24 Thread Chris Parrish
Yes, you got it right. But I need some help from other Radiant users out there. And, as I mentioned in my other email. This one's serving up with a "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" response so it looks like SnS could be the culprit. But I have *no* idea where to look in LiteSpeed to find out why it thinks

Re: [Radiant] potential bug in radiant:update on github edge

2008-07-24 Thread Sean Cribbs
Yeah, the generator is good about interpreting the ERb but I haven't added it to the update task yet. We'll definitely fix that before 0.6.8 release. Sean Oli Studholme wrote: > Hi All, > > Summary: freezing a current project to github edge then doing 'rake > radiant:update' generates a config/en

Re: [Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Sean Cribbs
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)? Sean Ollivier Robert wrote: Have you seen this announcement? http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html Apart from dropping of Markdown support

Re: [Radiant] SnS extension problem

2008-07-24 Thread Marshal Linfoot
OK Chris, I get it now. Ready for you to take a look. Thanks for all of this, by the way. Much appreciated. On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Chris Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marshal Linfoot wrote: >> >> Chris, I hope this is what you had in mind...a slimmed down version of >> what I cur

[Radiant] New RedCloth

2008-07-24 Thread Ollivier Robert
Have you seen this announcement? http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html Apart from dropping of Markdown support (does radiant use it?), it could be interesting to update it. -- Ollivier Robert - ___ Radiant